Abstract

One of the main issues during the development of a knowledge repository for the Technical Area of Architecture, called KOC, was the organization and structuration of this knowledge domain: the ArCo ontology. Although powerful tools to write ontologies exist, they do not guide their development. MetaConcept answers this need by defining the concepts that describe the structure of the ontology and its construction process: first a meta-ontology for the domain, then the ontology itself and then the knowledge repository. Two examples are presented, KOC 2.0, a data repository for real-world experiences in building construction and its knowledge repository, and ELLES, a repository of lessons learned in the domain of software construction projects.

Keywords

Ontology meta-ontology knowledge repositories knowledge objects Architectural Ontologies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bravo, G., Villazón, R.: KOC - Manejo Ontológico de Objetos de Conocimiento en la Construcción de Edificios. In: Avances en Sistemas e Informática, Medellín, vol. 4 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cifuentes, D.: KOC: Un Repositorio de Objetos de Conocimiento Para la Enseñanza de la Construcción - Tesis de Magíster en Ingeniería de Sistemas. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cruz, N., Bravo, G.: BArKo: Buscador Navegador de Objetos de conocimiento Descritos por ArCo en el proyecto KOC. In: Latin American Conference on Networked and Electronic Media, Cali (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Corcho, O.: Ontology Languages for the Semantic Web. IEEE IntelligentSystems 1(17) (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering: with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-commerce and the Semantic Web. Springer, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horridge, M.: Protégé OWL Tutorial. The University of Manchester (2011), http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/tutorials/protegeowltutorial
  7. 7.
    Lim, E., Liu, J., Lee, R.: Knowledge Seeker – Ontology Modelling for Information Search and Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Metadata for Architectural Contents in Europe, http://portal.mace-project.eu/Home
  9. 9.
    Numpake, A.: ELLES – Enterprise Lessons Learned System. Tesis de Magíster en Inge-niería de Sistemas. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwarz, U., Smith, B.: Ontological Relations. In: Reicher, M.E., Seibt, J., Smith, B., Wachter, D.V. (eds.) Applied Ontology: an Introduction. OntosVerlag, Heusenstamm (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research: Protegé, http://protege.stanford.edu/
  12. 12.
    Subhashini, R., Akilandeswari, J.: A survey of Ontology Construction Methodologies. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems 1(1) (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Villazón, R., Bravo, G., Cifuentes, D.: ArCo: An Ontology for Architectural Concepts in Construction. In: Knowledge Generation, Communication and Management: KGCM-15, Orlando (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Germán Bravo
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ingeniería de Sistemas y ComputaciónUniversidad de Los AndesBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations