Metropolitan Ecosystems among Heterogeneous Cognitive Networks: Issues, Solutions and Challenges
Cognitive Networks working on large scale are experimenting an increasing popularity. The interest, by both a scientific and commercial perspective, in the context of different environments, applications and domains is a fact. The natural convergence point for these heterogeneous disciplines is the need of a strong advanced technologic support that enables the generation of distributed observations on large scale as well as the intelligent process of obtained information. Focusing mostly on cognitive networks that generate information directly through sensor networks, existent solutions at level of metropolitan area are mainly limited by the use of obsolete/static coverage models as well as by a fundamental lack of flexibility respect to the dynamic features of the virtual organizations. Furthermore, the centralized view at the systems is a strong limitation for dynamic data processing and knowledge building.
KeywordsCognitive networks Semantic technologies Distributed computing Sensor networks
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Thomas, R.W., DaSilva, L.A., MacKenzie, A.B.: Cognitive networks. In: 2005 First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, DySPAN 2005, November 8-11 (2005)Google Scholar
- 3.Borgida, A., Sowa, J.F.: Principles of semantic networks: explorations in the representation of knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann Pub. (January 1991)Google Scholar
- 4.Urban ecosystem, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_ecosystem
- 6.Pileggi, S.F., Palau, C.E., Esteve, M.: Enabling Wireless Sensor Network within Virtual Organizations. In: Prasad, A., Buford, J., Gurbani, V. (eds.) Future Internet Services and Service Architectures. River Publishers (2011)Google Scholar
- 8.Pileggi, S.F.: A multi-domain framework for Wireless Vehicular Sensor Network. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Workshops (ICUMT 2009), St. Petersburg, Russia, October 12-14 (2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Foster, I., Zhao, Y., Raicu, I., Lu, S.: Cloud Computing and Grid Computing 360-Degree Compared. In: Grid Computing Environments Workshop, GCE 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
- 10.Mell, P., Grance, T.: Draft NIST Working Definition of Cloud Computing v14, Nat. Inst. Standards Technol. (2009), http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/cloud-computing/index.html
- 11.Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Tuecke, S.: The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations. International J. Supercomputer Applications 15(3) (2001)Google Scholar
- 12.Pileggi, S.F., Palau, C.E., Esteve, M.: Building Semantic Sensor Web: Knowledge and Interoperability. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semsntic Sensor Web (SSW 2010), Valencia, Spain (October 2010)Google Scholar
- 13.Pileggi, S.F., Fernandez-Llatas, C., Traver, V.: A Semantic Layer for Embedded Sensor Networks. ARPN Journal of Systems and Software 1(3), 101–107 (2011b)Google Scholar
- 14.Pileggi, S.F.: A Semantic Environment for Data Processing in Embedded Sensor Networks. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Interoperability (IWSI 2011), Rome, Italy (January 2011)Google Scholar