Toward the Design of a Dashboard to Promote Environmentally Sustainable Behavior among Office Workers

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7822)


In the United States, over three billion dollars are spent due to office equipment being left on when not in use during the weekend and at night. There is very little incentive for office workers to save energy because utility bills are not directly their responsibility. Our goal is to find ways to reduce the negative impact of this pervasive phenomenon by applying persuasive technologies to create awareness and encourage office workers towards more environmentally sustainable behavior. To this end, we conducted a literature review to investigate the persuasive methods appropriate to the field of building controls. We then proceeded to develop "dashboard-controllers" that enable office workers to control energy-using components with expert feedback to save energy.


Electricity Consumption Office Worker Apply Behavior Analysis Commercial Building Sustainable Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    1E PC Energy Report: PC Energy Report 2009, USA, United Kingdom, Germany (2009),
  2. 2.
    Kim, T., Hong, H., Magerko, B.: Designing for Persuasion: Toward Ambient Eco-Visualization for Awareness. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 106–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bang, M., Gustafsson, A., Katzeff, C.: Promoting New Patterns in Household Energy Consumption with Pervasive Learning Games. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 55–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steg, L., Vlek, C.: Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(3), 309–317 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Vries, P., Aarts, H., Midden, C.J.: Changing Simple Energy-Related Consumer Behaviors How the Enactment of Intentions Is Thwarted. Environment and Behavior, 612–633 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shiraishi, M., Washio, Y., Nakajima, T.: Using individual, social and economic persuasion techniques to reduce CO2 emissions in a family setting. In: Persuasive Technology 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foster, D., Lawson, S., Wardman, J., Blythe, M., Linehan, C.: Watts in it for me?: design implications for implementing effective energy interventions in organisations. In: CHI 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barendsen, E.: Saving Energy Where It Matters Most: A Hopeful Look,
  9. 9.
    Lucid Design Group: Elon University Strives to Reduce Energy Consumption Through Behavior Change (2010),
  10. 10.
    Winett, R.A., Neale, M.S., Grier, H.C.: Effects of self-monitoring and feedback on residential electricity consumption. Applied Behavior Analysis 12(2), 173–184 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yun, R., Scupelli, P., Aziz, A., Loftness, V.: Sustainability in the Workplace: Nine Intervention Techniques for Behavior Change. In: Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7822, pp. 253–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siero, F.W., Bakker, A.B., Dekker, G.B.: Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16, 235–246Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption. Energy Efficiency 1, 79–104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mercier, C., Moorefield, L.: Commercial Office Plug Load Savings Assessment (2011),
  15. 15.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Winett, R.A., Hatcher, J.W.: The effects of videotape modeling and daily feedback on residential electricity conservation. Applied Behavior Analysis 15, 381–402 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kohlenberg, R., Phillips, T., Proctor, W.: A behavioral analysis of peaking in residential electrical-energy consumers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 9(1), 13 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Harrigan, M.: Can we transform the market without transforming the customer? Home Energy 11(1) (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ArchitectureCarnegie Mellon UniversityUSA
  2. 2.School of DesignCarnegie Mellon UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Electrical and Computer EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations