Advertisement

Curbing Resource Consumption Using Team-Based Feedback

- Paper Printing in a Longitudinal Case Study -
  • Souleiman Hasan
  • Richard Medland
  • Marcus Foth
  • Edward Curry
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7822)

Abstract

This paper details a team-based feedback approach for reducing resource consumption. The approach uses paper printing within office environments as a case study. It communicates the print usage of each participant’s team rather than the participant’s individual print usage. Feedback is provided weekly via emails and contains normative information, along with eco-metrics and team-based comparative statistics. The approach was empirically evaluated to study the effectiveness of the feedback method. The experiment comprised of 16 people belonging to 4 teams with data on their print usage gathered over 58 weeks, using the first 30-35 weeks as a baseline. The study showed a significant reduction in individual printing with an average of 28%. The experiment confirms the underlying hypothesis that participants are persuaded to reduce their print usage in order to improve the overall printing behaviour of their teams. The research provides clear pathways for future research to qualitatively investigate our findings.

Keywords

Resource Consumption Resource Description Framework Injunctive Norm Feedback Method Paper Printing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pierce, J., Odom, W., Blevis, E.: Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Medland, R.: Curbing paper wastage using flavoured feedback. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 224–227. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fogg, B.J.: Creating persuasive technologies: an eight-step design process. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp. 44:1–44:6. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Stanton, N.A.: The Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics 41, 382–392 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khaled, R., Biddle, R., Noble, J., Barr, P., Fischer, R.: Persuasive interaction for collectivist cultures. In: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian User Interface Conference, vol. 50, pp. 73–80 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foth, M., Paulos, E., Satchell, C., Dourish, P.: Pervasive computing and environmental sustainability: two conference workshops. IEEE Pervasive Computing 8, 78–81 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340 (1989)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.K.: Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. Mis Quarterly, 113–143 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reno, R.R., Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A.: The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 104 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schultz, P.W., Nolan, J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Goldstein, N.J., Griskevicius, V.: The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 18, 429–434 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cialdini, R.B.: Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12, 105–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Darby, S.: The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and direct Displays, 486 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The design of eco-feedback technology. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1999–2008 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strengers, Y.A.A.: Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2135–2144 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, T.B., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284, 34–43 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klyne, G., Carroll, J.J.: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/ (last accessed January 2013)
  18. 18.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data- Design Issues, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html (last accessed January 2013)
  19. 19.
    Curry, E., Hasan, S., ul Hassan, U., Herstand, M., O’Riain, S.: An Entity-Centric Approach to Green Information Systems. In: The 19th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prud’Hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C working draft. 4 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Curry, E., Hasan, S., O’Riain, S.: Enterprise Energy Management using a Linked Dataspace for Energy Intelligence. In: Second IFIP Conference on Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Curry, E., Hasan, S., White, M., Melvin, H.: An Environmental Chargeback for Data Center and Cloud Computing Consumers. In: Huusko, J., de Meer, H., Klingert, S., Somov, A. (eds.) E2DC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7396, pp. 117–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsu, H., Lachenbruch, P.A.: Paired t test. Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A.: A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49, 765–769 (1954)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cowles, M., Davis, C.: On the origins of the. 05 level of statistical significance. American Psychologist 37, 553 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Souleiman Hasan
    • 1
  • Richard Medland
    • 2
  • Marcus Foth
    • 2
  • Edward Curry
    • 1
  1. 1.Digital Enterprise Research InstituteNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Urban Informatics Research Lab.Queensland University of Technology & NICTAAustralia

Personalised recommendations