Mitigating Climate Change pp 45-57

Part of the Springer Environmental Science and Engineering book series (SPRINGERENVIRON) | Cite as

Resource-Centered Cities and the Opportunity of Shrinkage

Chapter

Abstract

Our planet is being anthroposized at high speed with Climate Change and other global environmental damages as its consequence. As home of most consumers, many are looking at cities for solutions. Urban densification is often seen as ‘the’ way towards more urban sustainability. However, externalities of urban consumption and the complexity of the urban system are mostly left out of consideration, leading to unexpected results. This chapter advocates a transition from consumption-centered to resource-centered cities. In an age of rapid urbanization, this chapter further argues how shrinking cities could unexpectedly function as catalysts for change. A shrinking population and a retreat of the current economic system give shrinking cities the potential for becoming front-running resource-centered cities.

Keywords

Resource-centered Complex systems Transition Shrinking cities Closed cycles 

References

  1. Bai X, McAllister R, Beaty M, Taylor B (2010) Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daly H (2001) Five policy recommendations for a sustainable economy. In Douthwaite R and Jopling J (eds) FEASTA Review No. 1. Dartington: Green Books. Cited in Frey and Yaneske (2007), p 56Google Scholar
  3. Diamond J (2006) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive. London: Penguin Books. p 498. Cited in Frey and Yaneske (2007), p 61Google Scholar
  4. Dodman D (2009) United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Analytical review of the interaction between urban growth trends and environmental changes. Paper 1: urban density and climate change. Revised Draft—April 2, 2009. Retrieved 23 Aug 2012 from http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/users/schensul/public/CCPD/papers/Dodman%20Paper.pdf
  5. Frey H, Yaneske P (2007) Visions of sustainability. Cities and regions. Tailor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Girardet H (1999) Creating Sustainable Cities. Dartington, UK: Green Books, for The Schumacher Society, p 17. Cited in Frey and Yaneske (2007), p 85Google Scholar
  7. McDonough W (2005) Cradle to cradle design. TED Talks. Retrieved 28 Oct 2012 from http://www.ted.com/talks/william_mcdonough_on_cradle_to_cradle_design.html
  8. Mumford L (1984) The City in History. Harmondsworth. UK: Penguin Books. Cited in Frey and Yaneske (2007), p. 85Google Scholar
  9. Nair C (2010) Consumptionomics: Asia’s role in reshaping and saving the planet. Infinite Ideas, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Oswalt P (n.d.) Hypotheses on urban shrinking in the 21st century. Retrieved 23 Aug 2012 from http://www.shrinkingcities.com/hypothesen.0.html
  11. Oswalt P, Schmidt A (2010) After the end of the fossil energy era: the climate and the energy landscape in Saxony-Anhalt 2050. In: Saxony-Anhalt Ministry of Regional Development and Transport. International building exhibition urban redevelopment Saxony-Anhalt 2010. Less is future. 19 Cities—10 Themes. Jovis; pp 830–847Google Scholar
  12. Rovers R, Rovers V (2011) Zero impact built environments, transition towards 2050. A case study using urban harvest + methodology in Kerkrade West. Executive summery of the original report in Dutch. Retrieved 19 Sep 2011 from www.sustainablebuilding.info
  13. Sanders I (2008) Complex systems thinking and new urbanism. In: Haas T (ed) New urbanism and beyond: designing cities for the future. Rizzoli, New York, pp 275–279Google Scholar
  14. Sassen S (2009) Bridging the ecologies of cities and of nature. The 4th international conference of the international forum of urbanism (IFoU) 2009 Amsterdam/Delft. The New Urban Question—Urbanism beyond Neo-Liberalism. (pp 45–52). Retrieved 23 Aug 2012 from http://newurbanquestion.ifou.org/proceedings/index.html
  15. Sassen S (2010) Cities are the center of our environmental future. Sapiens 2(3): 1–8Google Scholar
  16. Sassen S, Dotan N (2011) Delegating, not returning, to the biosphere: how to use the multi-scalar and ecological properties of cities. Global Environ Change 21:823–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. von Weizäcker E U, Lovins A B, Lovins L H (1998) Factor Four: Doubling Wealth – Halving Resource Use. London: Earthscan. Cited in Frey and Yaneske (2007), p 56Google Scholar
  18. Wackernagel M, Rees W (1995) Our Ecological Footprint. Gabriola, New Society Publishers. Cited in Dodman (2009), pp 3–4Google Scholar
  19. Wackernagel M, Kitzes J, Moran D, Goldfinger S, Thomas M (2006) The ecological Footprint of cities and regions: comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environment and Urbanization 18(1):103-112. Cited in Dodman (2009), pp 3–4Google Scholar
  20. Wiechmann T (2006) Types of shrinking cities—introductive notes on a global issue. International symposium “coping with city shrinkage and demographic change—lessons from around the globe”. Retrieved 23 Aug 2012 from http://www.schader-stiftung.de/wohn_wandel/966.php

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e.V. (IASS)PotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations