Developing and Validating a Scale for Perceived Usefulness for the Mobile Wallet

  • Debby Ho
  • Milena Head
  • Khaled Hassanein
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 206)


Mobile wallet applications are new and promising mobile payment technologies. While researchers have started to explore adoption models in this domain, they have taken a generic approach to understanding customers’ perceived usefulness of this technology. In this research-in-progress paper, we seek to develop a new, goal-oriented construct to understand the perceived usefulness of the mobile wallet from a consumer’s perspective, which should provide a richer meaning to both academic and practitioner communities.


Mobile Wallet Perceived Usefulness Scale Development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Amoroso, D., Magnier-Watanabe, R.: Building a Research Model for Mobile Wallet Consumer Adoption: The Case of Mobile Sucia in Japan. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 7(1), 94–110 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research, conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benbasat, I., Barki, H.: Quo vadis tam? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4), 211–218 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benamati, et al.: Are trust and distrust distint constructs? An empirical study of effects of trust and distrust among online banking users. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 39 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ceipidor, U., Medaglia, C., Opromolla, A., Volpi, V., Moroni, A., Sposato, S.: A Survey about User Experience Improvement in Mobile Proximity Payment. In: 4th International Workshop on Near Field Communication (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chesney, T.: Opening the Black Box of PU: An IS Approach to Defining and Measuring Userfulness. Nottingham University Business School Research Paper No. 2010-05 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chin, W.: Issues and Opinions on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly 22(1), 7–16 (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    comScore. 2011 State of Online and Mobile Banking (Feburary 2012), (retrieved)
  9. 9.
    Davis, F.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Financial Brand. Targeting Underbanked Consumers with Mobile Banking Soluations (June 19, 2012), (retrieved)
  11. 11.
    Fitzmaurice, M.: When did onlilne banking begin? (2012), (retrieved)
  12. 12.
    Fornell, C., Bookstein, F.: Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory. Journal of Marketing Research 19, 440–452 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gefen, D.: E-Commerce: The Role of Familiarity and Trust. Omega 28(5), 725–737 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hambleton, R.: Fundamentals of item Response Theory. Sage (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoofnagle, C., Urban, J., Li, S.: Mobile Payments: Consumer Benefits & New Privacy Concerns, BCLT Research Paper (2012),
  16. 16.
    Huynh, S.: The Data Digest: Mobile Banking’s Massive Growth is Supplementary to PC Banking (July 6, 2012), (retrieved)
  17. 17.
    ITU Telecom World. The World in 2011: ICT Facts and Figures (2011), (retrieved)
  18. 18.
    Jarvis, C., Mackenzie, S., Padsakoff, P.: A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research (30), 199–217 (September 2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Javelin Strategy & Research. 5th Annual Mobile Security Report: Mitigating Security Risks Transforms the Mobile Banking Channel (December 2011), (retrieved)
  20. 20.
    Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., Lee, I.: Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 26, pp. 310–322 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laukkanen, T., Lauronen, J.: Consumer value creation in mobile banking services. International Journal of Mobile Communications 3(4), 325–338 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maisto, M.: Google Wallet, Isis, NFC Will Push Mobile Payments to $1.3 Trillion, eWeek (2012),
  23. 23.
    Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research 2(3), 192–222 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., Seth, N.: Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities. MIS Quarterly 30(2), 225–246 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robertson, G.: Mobile banking apps take off. Globe and Mail (July 03, 2011), (retrieved)
  26. 26.
    Sturgeon, J.: Rogers and CIBC first to launch ‘mobile wallets’ in Canada. Financial Post (May 15, 2012), (retrieved)
  27. 27.
    Schmeiser, M.D., Cope, A.M.: Risk Perception. Risk Tolerance and Consumer Adoption of Mobile Banking Services (April 30, 2012), (retrieved)
  28. 28.
    Shin, D.: User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computers 19(4), 45–59 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shin, D.: Towards an Understanding of the Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Wallet. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 1343–1354 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun, H., Zhang, P.: The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 64(2), 53–78 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    White, S.: Canadians embracing mobile banking. Globe and Mail (April 30, 2012), (retrieved)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debby Ho
    • 1
  • Milena Head
    • 1
  • Khaled Hassanein
    • 1
  1. 1.DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations