An Atlas for Cardiac MRI Regional Wall Motion and Infarct Scoring
Regional wall motion and infarct scoring of MR images are routine clinical tools to grade performance and scarring in the heart. The aim of this paper is to provide a framework for automatic scoring to alert the diagnostician to potential regions of abnormality. We investigated different shape and motion configurations of a finite-element cardiac atlas of the left ventricle. Two patient populations were used: 300 asymptomatic volunteers and 105 patients with myocardial infarction, both randomly selected from the Cardiac Atlas Project database. Support vector machines were employed to estimate the boundaries between the asymptomatic control and patient groups for each of 16 standard anatomical regions in the heart. Ground truth visual wall motion scores from standard cines and infarct scoring from late enhancement were provided by experienced observers. From all configurations, end-systolic shape best predicted wall motion abnormalities (global accuracy 78%, positive predictive value 85%, specificity 91%, sensitivity 60%) and infarct scoring (74%, 72%, 91%, 44%). In conclusion, computer assisted wall motion and infarct scoring has the potential to provide robust identification of those segments requiring further clinical attention; in particular, the high specificity and relatively low sensitivity could help avoid unnecessary late gadolinium rescanning of patients.
KeywordsSupport Vector Machine Positive Predictive Value Wall Motion Late Gadolinium Enhancement Regional Wall Motion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Duchateau, N., De Craene, M., Piella, G., Silva, E., Doltra, A., Sitges, M., Bijnens, B., Frangi, A.: A spatiotemporal statistical atlas of motion for the quantification of abnormal myocardial tissue velocities. Medical Image Analysis (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Hoffmann, R., von Bardeleben, S., Kasprzak, J.D., et al.: Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: A multicenter comparison of methods. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47(1), 121–128 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Redheuil, A.B., Kachenoura, N., Laporte, R., et al.: Interobserver variability in assessing segmental function can be reduced by combining visual analysis of CMR cine sequences with corresponding parametric images of myocardial contraction. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 9(6), 863–872 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Vapnik, V.: The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer (2000)Google Scholar
- 18.Young, A., Cowan, B., Thrupp, S., Hedley, W., Dell’Italia, L.: Left Ventricular Mass and Volume: Fast Calculation with Guide-Point Modeling on MR Images. Radiology 216(2), 597 (2000)Google Scholar