IWEI 2013: Enterprise Interoperability pp 6-21 | Cite as
Enhancing the Maturity of Open Service Ecosystems and Inter-enterprise Collaborations
Abstract
The present business era is labeled by collaborations across enterprise boundaries and by utilisation of service-based computing. Pervasive computing utilities are created to match the basic business activities, such as contracting and breach management, adaptation of innovative business models, and collaboration management. Categories of computer assisted breeding environments and automated service collaboration management ecosystems have been developed to address these needs. However, a maturity framework is required for comparing solutions and indicating gaps in systems development and standardisation, and for adoption of a sufficient set of multidisciplinary research and evaluation methodologies. This paper first introduces steps towards a maturity model, focusing on features that contribute to the correctness of collaborations and scalability of the ecosystem. Second, it introduces the choices made in Pilarcos ecosystem. Finally, it discusses the need for standards and maturity models on this domain, and raises issues on the research methodologies required.
Keywords
Service Ecosystem Business Process Business Service Deontic Logic Ecosystem EngineeringReferences
- 1.Ruokolainen, T.: A Model-Driven Approach to Service Ecosystem Engineering. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science (accepted for defence, 2013)Google Scholar
- 2.Kutvonen, L., Metso, J., Ruohomaa, S.: From trading to eCommunity management: Responding to social and contractual challenges. Information Systems Frontiers 9(2-3), 181–194 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ruohomaa, S.: The effect of reputation on trust decisions in inter-enterprise collaborations. PhD thesis, Univ. of Helsinki, Dept. of Computer Science (2012)Google Scholar
- 4.Kutvonen, L., Norta, A., Ruohomaa, S.: Inter-enterprise business transaction management in open service ecosystems. In: EDOC 2012 (September 2012)Google Scholar
- 5.Ruokolainen, T., Kutvonen, L.: 21: Framework for managing features of open service ecosystems. In: Handbook of Research on Non-Functional Properties for Service-Oriented Systems: Future Directions. IGI Global (December 2011)Google Scholar
- 6.Kutvonen, L.: ODP RM reflections on open service ecosystems. Computer Standards & Interfaces (February 2012) (in press)Google Scholar
- 7.Kutvonen, L., Ruokolainen, T., Metso, J.: Interoperability middleware for federated business services in web-Pilarcos. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, Special issue on Interoperability of Enterprise Systems and Applications 3(1), 1–21 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Stojanovic, Z., Dahanayake, A. (eds.): Service-Oriented Software System Engineering: Challenges and Practices. Idea Group Publishing (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Papazoglou, M.: Web Services and SOA: Principles and Technology, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall (2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Kutvonen, L., Ruohomaa, S., Metso, J.: Automating Decisions for Inter-Enterprise Collaboration Management. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Picard, W. (eds.) Pervasive Collaborative Networks. IFIP, vol. 283, pp. 127–134. Springer, Boston (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ruokolainen, T.: Modelling framework for interoperability management in collaborative computing environments. Licentiate thesis, University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science (2009)Google Scholar
- 12.Payne, T.: Web services from an agent perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems 23(2), 12–14 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kutvonen, L.: Multi-tier agent architecture for open service ecosystems. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Agreement Technologies, Dubrovnik, Croatia (October 2012)Google Scholar
- 14.Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U.: The nature of human altruism. Nature (October 2003)Google Scholar
- 15.Mehandjiev, N., Afsarmanesh, H., Camarinha-Matos, L., Kutvonen, L., Norta, A.: Dynamic Business Process Formation for Instant Virtual Enterprises. In: Comparable Approaches to IVE. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Shen, Y., Miettinen, M., Moen, P., Kutvonen, L.: Privacy preservation approach in service ecosystems. In: EDOC 2011 Workshops, pp. 283–292 (2011)Google Scholar
- 17.von Wright, G.H.: Deontic logic. Mind 60(237), 1–15 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Ruohomaa, S., Kaur, P., Kutvonen, L.: From Subjective Reputation to Verifiable Experiences — Augmenting Peer-Control Mechanisms for Open Service Ecosystems. In: Dimitrakos, T., Moona, R., Patel, D., McKnight, D.H. (eds.) IFIPTM 2012. IFIP AICT, vol. 374, pp. 142–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Bellwood, T., Clément, L., Ehnebuske, D., Hately, A., Hondo, M., Husband, Y.L., Januszewski, K., Lee, S., McKee, B., Munter, J., von Riegen, C.: UDDI Version 3.0. UDDI Spec Technical Committee Specification (July 19, 2002)Google Scholar
- 20.ISO/IEC: IS13235-1: Information technology - Open distributed processing – Trading function: Specification (1998)Google Scholar
- 21.Fitzpatrick, T., Blair, G.S., Coulson, G., Davies, N., Robin, P.: Supporting adaptive multimedia applications through open bindings. In: Configurable Distributed Systems, pp. 128–135 (1998)Google Scholar
- 22.Ruohomaa, S., Kutvonen, L.: Behavioural Evaluation of Reputation-Based Trust Systems. In: van Sinderen, M., Luttighuis, P.O., Folmer, E., Bosems, S. (eds.) IWEI 2013. LNBIP, vol. 144, pp. 158–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar