Advertisement

Low Carbon Housing: Understanding Occupant Guidance and Training

  • Isabel Carmona-Andreu
  • Fionn Stevenson
  • Mary Hancock
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 22)

Abstract

Recent research into occupant behaviour in low carbon housing indicates that for the same type of house, energy and water use can vary by up to fourteen times between different households. This paper assesses the information and training the occupants received in two contrasting building performance evaluation case studies of exemplary low carbon housing. Key findings showed a lack of a coordinated set of guidance for occupants and poor understanding on the trainers’ part on specifics of the centralised heating and mechanical ventilation systems. As a consequence occupants were unable to operate or maintain these systems with confidence. Recommendations are made to develop guidance and “hands on” training that keeps usability in mind and empowers occupants to contribute to reductions in carbon emissions.

Keywords

low carbon housing occupants guidance usability procedures 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bordass, W., Leaman, A., Bunn, R.: Controls for end-occupants: a guide for good design and implementation, BSRIA, Bracknell (2007)Google Scholar
  2. Crest Nicholson– Customer Charter (2012), http://www.crestnicholson.com/customercare/default.aspx (accessed April 19, 2012)
  3. Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Homes for the future. More affordable, more sustainable, Cm 7191, HMSO, London (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Code for Sustainable Homes: Technical Guide, DCLG, London (2010a) Google Scholar
  5. Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Domestic Building Services Compliance Guide 2010, DCLG, London (2010b) Google Scholar
  6. Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Domestic Ventilation Compliance Guide, DCLG, London (2011)Google Scholar
  7. Ebbinghaus, H.: Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology - translated by Ruger HA and Bussenius CE (1913) accessed through York University, Ontario, website (1885), http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm
  8. Flyvbjerg, B.: Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2), 219–245 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geertz, C.: Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, pp. 3–30. Basic Books, New-York (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Gill, Z.M., Tierney, M.J., Pegg, I.M., Allan, N.: ’Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance. Building Research & Information 38(5), 491–508 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Good Homes Alliances (GHA) members, e-mail exchange with researcher (2012)Google Scholar
  12. HM Government (HMG) – The Building Regulations 2000 – Approved Document F: Ventilation, 2010 edn. (2010a) Google Scholar
  13. HM Government (HMG) – The Building Regulations 2000 – Approved Document L1A Conservation of fuel and power – New Dwellings, 2010 edn. (2010b) Google Scholar
  14. Medina, J.: Brain rules. Pear Press (2008)Google Scholar
  15. Monahan, S., Gemmel, A.: How occupants behave and interact with their homes - The impact on energy use, comfort, control and satisfaction NHBC Foundation NF35 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  17. Scottish Government (SG)– Building (Scotland) Regulations 2004 - Technical Domestic handbook (October 2011a) Google Scholar
  18. Scottish Government (SG) – Guidance for Living in a Low Carbon Home – report prepared by MARU and 55NorthArchitecture (2011b) Google Scholar
  19. Pilkington, B., Roach, R., Perkins, J.: Relative benefits of technology and occupant behaviour in moving towards a more energy efficient, sustainable housing paradigm. Energy Policy 39(9), 4962–4970 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pink, S.: Ethnography of the invisible: energy in the multisensory home. Ethnologia Europaea: Journal of European Ethnology 41(1), 117–128 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Stevenson, F., Carmona-Andreu, I., Hancock, M.: Designing for comfort – usability barriers in low carbon housing. In: Proceedings of 7th Windsor Conference: The Changing Context of Comfort in an Unpredictable World, Windsor, UK, London (2012), http://nceub.org.uk
  22. Stevenson, F., Rijal, H.B.: Developing occupancy feedback from a prototype to improve housing production. Building Research and Information 38(5), 550–564 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. Way, M., Bordass, W., Leaman, A., Bunn, R.: The Soft Landings Framework: for better briefing, design, handover and building performance in-use, BSRIA, Bracknell (2009)Google Scholar
  24. Zeisel, J.: Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment– Behaviour Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel Carmona-Andreu
    • 1
  • Fionn Stevenson
    • 2
  • Mary Hancock
    • 3
  1. 1.CA Sustainable ArchitectureNewburyUK
  2. 2.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  3. 3.Oxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations