Sustainable Renovation and Operation of Family Houses for Improved Climate Efficiency

Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 22)

Abstract

In the developed world the existing stock of houses will provide shelter to the majority of population in the upcoming years. Houses are physical objects that consume material and energy and need to be maintained, repaired and restructured from time to time. In order to fulfill the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol and be comfortable for their inhabitants, the existing stock needs to be renovated. Strong disagreements between different parts of the scientific community and overlapping and contradictory concepts make the definition of sustainable renovation confusing. In this study, therefore, an approach of renovation and operation for higher energy efficiency and lower climate impact has been the main focus. Based on a systems analysis approach, the aim of this work is to evaluate cost and benefits of possible actions and choosing the most energy and cost effective approach of a series of alternatives. With the result of this analysis, a sustainable renovation and operation staircase is proposed. The work found that it is possible to develop a staircase manual for sustainable renovation and operation of family houses that follows a logical step-by-step approach and could result in considerable life cycle reductions in both costs and climate impact. The work also suggests that it is possible for academic experts to develop material in a simpler form and language to reach the public in a more understandable form.

Keywords

sustainable renovation energy savings CBA LCCA sustainable staircase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barringer, H.P.: A Life Cycle Cost Summary. In: International Conference of Maintenance Societies (ICOMS 2003), Perth (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botta, M.: Toward Sustainable Renovation. Three Research Projects. Dissertation. The Royal Institute of Technology (2005) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Çengel, Y.A.: Heat Transfer: a practical approach. McGraw Hill, Blacklick (2003) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellis, B.A.: Life Cycle Cost. Jethroproject (2007), http://www.jethroproject.com/Life%20Cycle%20Cost1.pdf (accessed February 26, 2010)
  5. 5.
    Eurostat Electricity –market prices – half year prices – data until 2007. EUROSTAT (2009), http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/dataset?p_product_code=NRG_PC_206_H (accessed April 07, 2009)
  6. 6.
    Kaklauskas, A., Naimariciene, J., Tupenaile, L., Kanapeckiere, L.: Knowledge base model for sustainable renovation. Modern Buildings Materials, Structures and Techniques. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University. Vilnius (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mørck, O.C., Charlot-Valdieu, C., Nagy, L.: Methods and tools for Sustainable Renovation of Urban Neighbourhoods in the HQE2R Project. The International Solar Energy Society (ISES), Freiburg (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., Olsson, L.: Categorising tools for Sustainable Assessment. Ecol. Econ. 60, 498–598 (2006), doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    State of Alaska – Department of Education and Early Development. Life Cycle Cost Analysis Handbook, Juneau (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Insulation Fact Sheet, Washington, D.C. (2008) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Energy Savers Booklet, Washington, D.C. (2008) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Energy Star Building Upgrade Manual, Washington D.C. (2004) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watkings, T.: An introduction to Cost Benefit Analysis. San Jose State University (2004), http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/cba.htm (accessed February 26, 2010)
  14. 14.
    Wierenga, M.: A brief introduction to Environmental Economics. Environmental Law Alliance Worlwide, Eugene (2003) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wrisberg, H.A., de Haes, U., Triebswetter, U., Eder, P., Cliff, R.: Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a System Perspective. The combined use of analytical tools. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Industrial EcologyThe Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations