Advertisement

Electrical Long-Distance Signaling in Plants

  • Matthias R. Zimmermann
  • Axel Mithöfer
Part of the Signaling and Communication in Plants book series (SIGCOMM, volume 19)

Abstract

In higher plants at least three different types of electrical long-distance signaling exist: action potential (AP), variation potential (VP), and system potential (SP), all of which have their own characteristics concerning their generation, duration, amplitude, velocity, and propagation. Whereas both AP and VP are due to a transient depolarization of the plasma membrane, the SP is based on hyperpolarization. For more than 100 years the AP is known and described for some specialized plants such as the Venus flytrap. Meanwhile, all three types of electrical signaling have been shown for many common plants, monocots as well as dicots, indicating that the capability to generate long-distance electrical signals is not the exception but a general physiological feature of plants. In spite of this, positive proofs for the involvement of these kinds of electrical signaling in the induction of many different plant responses to (a)biotic stresses or in developmental processes still wait to be established.

Keywords

Action potential Variation potential System potential Downstream signaling DIR1 

References

  1. Adam G, Läuger P, Stark G (2009) Physikalische Chemie und Biophysik. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beilby MJ (2007) Action potential in charophytes. Int Rev Cytol 257:43–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blatt FJ (1974) Temperature dependence of the action potential in Nitella flexilis. Biochim Biophys Acta 339:382–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bose JCH (1907) Plant response as a means of physiological investigation. Longman, Green & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Braam J (2004) In touch: plant responses to mechanical stimuli. New Phytol 165:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley J, Williams EJ (1966) Chloride electrochemical potentials and membrane resistances in Nitella translucens. J Exp Bot 18:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burdon-Sanderson J (1873) Note on the electrical phenomena which accompany irritation of the leaf of Dionaea muscipula. Proc R Soc Lond 21:495–496Google Scholar
  8. Canny MJP (1975) Mass transfer. In: Zimmermann HM, Milburn JA (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 139–153Google Scholar
  9. Darwin CR (1875) Insectivorous plants. John Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies E (1987) Action potentials as multifunctional signals in plants: a unifying hypothesis to explain apparently disparate wound responses. Plant Cell Environ 10:623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dziubinska H, Paszewski A, Trebacz K, Zawadzki T (1983) Electrical activity of the liverwort Conocephalum conicum: The all-or-nothing law, strength-duration relation, refractory periods and intracellular potentials. Physiol Plantarum 57:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dziubinska H, Trebacz K, Zawadzki T (2001) Transmission route for action potentials and variation potentials in Helianthus annuus L. J Plant Physiol 158:1167–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dziubinska H, Filek M, Koscielniak J, Trebacz K (2003) Variation and action potentials evoked by thermal stimuli accompany enhancement of ethylene emission in distant non-stimulated leaves of Vicia faba minor seedlings. J Plant Physiol 160:1203–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eschrich W, Fromm J, Evert RF (1988) Transmission of electric signals in sieve tubes of zucchini plants. Bot Acta 101:327–331Google Scholar
  15. Favre P, Greppin H, Agosti RD (2001) Repetitive action potentials induced in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves by wounding and potassium chloride application. Plant Physiol 39:961–969Google Scholar
  16. Felle HH, Zimmermann MR (2007) Systemic signalling in barley through action potentials. Planta 226:203–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Felle HH, Hanstein S, Steinmeyer R, Hedrich R (2000) Dynamics of ionic activities in the apoplast of the sub-stomatal cavity of intact Vicia faba leaves during stomatal closure evoked by ABA and darkness. Plant J 24:297–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fisahn J, Herde O, Willmitzer L, Peña-Cortés H (2004) Analysis of the transient increase in cytosolic Ca2+ during the action potential of higher plants with high temporal resolution: requirement of Ca2+ transients for induction of jasmonic acid biosynthesis and PINII gene expression. Plant Cell Physiol 45:456–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fromm J, Bauer T (1994) Action potentials in maize sieve tubes change phloem translocation. J Exp Bot 45:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fromm J, Eschrich W (1988) Transport processes in stimulated and non-stimulated leaves of Mimosa pudica. Trees 2:18–24Google Scholar
  21. Fromm J, Eschrich W (1993) Electric signals released from roots of willow Salix viminalis L. change transpiration and photosynthesis. J Plant Physiol 141:673–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fromm J, Fei HM (1998) Electrical signaling and gas exchange in maize plants of drying soil. Plant Sci 132:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fromm J, Lautner S (2007) Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. Plant Cell Environ 30:249–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fromm J, Spanswick R (1993) Characteristics of action potentials in willow (Salix viminalis L.). J Exp Bot 44:1119–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Furch ACU, Hafke JB, Schulz A, van Bel AJE (2007) Ca2+-mediated remote control of reversible sieve tube occlusion in Vicia faba. J Exp Bot 61:3697–3708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Furch ACU, van Bel AJE, Fricker MD, Felle HH, Fuchs M, Hafke JB (2009) Sieve element Ca2+ channels as relay stations between remote stimuli and sieve tube occlusion in Vicia faba. Plant Cell 21:2118–2132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Furch ACU, Zimmermann MR, Will T, Hafke JB, van Bel AJE (2010) Remote-controlled stop of phloem mass flow by biphasic occlusion in Cucurbita maxima. J Exp Bot 61:3697–3708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gradmann D (1976) “Metabolic” action potentials in Acetabularia. J Membr Biol 29:23–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graham JS, Hall G, Pearce G, Ryan CA (1986) Regulation of proteinase inhibitors I and II mRNAs in leaves of wounded tomato plants. Planta 169:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hager A (2003) Role of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase in auxin-induced elongation growth: historical and new aspects. J Plant Res 116:483–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Herde O, Peña-Cortés H, Willmitzer L, Fisahn J (1998) Remote stimulation by heat induces characteristic membrane-potential responses in the veins of wild-type and abscisic acid-deficient tomato plants. Planta 206:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hlavácková V, Krchnák P, Naus J, Novák O, Spundová M, Strnad M (2006) Electrical and chemical signals involved in short-term systemic photosynthetic responses of tobacco plants to local burning. Planta 225:235–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodick D, Sievers A (1988) The action potential of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 174:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hope AB, Findlay GP (1964) The action potential in Chara. Plant Cell Physiol 5:377–379Google Scholar
  35. Houwink AL (1935) The conduction of excitation in Mimosa pudica. Recueil des Travaux Botaniques Neerlandais 32:51–91Google Scholar
  36. Julien JL, Desbiez MO, de Jeagher G, Frachisse JM (1991) Characteristics of the wave of depolarization induced by wounding in Bidens pilosa. J Exp Bot 42:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kikuyama M (1987) Ion efflux during a single action potential of Nitella axilliformis in medium lacking Ca2+. Plant Cell Physiol 28:179–186Google Scholar
  38. Kunkel KAJ (1898) Über elektromotorische Wirkungen an unverletzten lebenden Pflanzenteilen. Arbeiten des Botanischen Instituts Würzburg 2:1–17Google Scholar
  39. Lautner S, Grams EET, Matyssek R, Fromm J (2005) Characteristics of electrical signals in poplar and responses in photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 139:2200–2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lunevsky VZ, Zherelova OM, Yostrikov IY, Berestovsky GN (1983) Excitation of Characeae cell membranes as a result of activation of calcium and chloride channels. J Membr Biol 72:43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malone M (1992) Kinetics of wound-induced hydraulic signals and variation potentials in wheat seedlings. Planta 187:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malone M, Stanković B (1991) Surface potentials and hydraulic signals in wheat leaves following localized wounding by heat. Plant Cell Environ 14:431–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marrè E (1979) Fusicoccin: a tool in plant physiology. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 30:273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mithöfer A, Boland W (2012) Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Ann Rev Plant Biol 63:431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Opritov VA, Lobov SA, Pyatgin SS, Mysyagin SA (2005) Analysis of possible involvement of local bioelectric responses in chilling perception by higher plants exemplified by Cucurbita pepo. Russ J Plant Physiol 52:801–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Paszewski A, Zawadzki T (1976) Action potentials in Lupinus angustifolius L. shoots. III. Determination of the refractory periods. J Exp Bot 27:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pickard BG (1973) Action potentials in higher plants. Bot Rev 39:172–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pyatygin SS, Opritov VA, Vodeneev VA (2008) Signaling role of action potentials in higher plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 55:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rhodes JD, Thain JF, Wildon DC (1996) The pathway for systemic electrical signal conduction in the wounded tomato plant. Planta 200:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ricca U (1916) Soluzione d´un problema di fisiologia: la propagazione di stimulo nella Mimosa. Nuovo Giornale Botanico Italiano 23:51–170Google Scholar
  51. Roblin G (1985) Analysis of the variation potential induced by wounding in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 26:455–461Google Scholar
  52. Roblin G, Bonnemain JL (1985) Propagation in Vicia faba stem of a potential variation induced by wounding. Plant Cell Physiol 26:1273–1283Google Scholar
  53. Sibaoka T (1953) Some aspects on the slow conduction of stimuli in the leaf of Mimosa pudica. Sci Rep Tohoku Univ Biol 20:72–88Google Scholar
  54. Sibaoka T (1969) Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 20:165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1992) Rapid alterations in growth rate and electrical potentials upon stem excision in pea seedlings. Planta 187:523–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1994) Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. I. Short-distance effects are a result of wounding. Plant Cell Environ 17:1143–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1996) Induction and ionic basis of slow wave potentials in seedlings of Pisum sativum L. Planta 200:416–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1997a) The propagation of slow wave potentials in pea epicotyls. Plant Physiol 113:209–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ (1997b) Slow wave potentials in cucumber differ in form and growth effect from those in pea seedlings. Physiol Plantarum 101:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stahlberg R, Cleland RE, van Volkenburgh E (2005) Decrement and amplification of slow wave potentials during their propagation in Helianthus annuus L. shoots. Planta 220:550–558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stanković B, Davies E (1996) Both action potentials and variation potentials induce proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. FEBS Lett 390:275–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stanković B, Davies E (1997) Intercellular communication in plants: electrical stimulation of proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. Planta 202:402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stanković B, Zawadzki T, Davies E (1997) Characterization of the variation potential in sunflower. Plant Physiol 115:1083–1088PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tarr SE, Lannoye RJ, Dainty J (1970) Changes of ionic and electrical properties of Chara australis when the external Ca is replaced by Mg. J Exp Bot 21:552–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trebacz K (1992) Measurements of intra- and extracellular pH in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum during action potentials. Physiol Plantarum 84:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Trebacz K, Tarnecki R, Zawadzki T (1989) The effects of ionic channel inhibitors and factors modifying metabolism on the excitability of the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Physiol Plantarum 75:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trebacz K, Simonis W, Schönknecht G (1994) Cytoplasmatic Ca2+, K+, Cl, and NO3 activities in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum L. at rest and during action potentials. Plant Physiol 106:1073–1084PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Trebacz K, Simonis W, Schönknecht G (1997) Effects of anion channel inhibitors on light-induced potential changes in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Plant Cell Physiol 38:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tsutsui I, Taka-aki O, Kishimoto U (1986) Inhibition of Cl channel activation in Chara corallina membrane by lanthanum ion. Plant Cell Physiol 27:1197–1200Google Scholar
  70. van Bel AJE, Ehlers K (2005) Electrical signalling via plasmodesmata. In: Oparka KJ (ed) Plasmodesmata. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 263–278Google Scholar
  71. van Sambeek JW, Pickard BG (1976a) Mediation of rapid electrical, metabolic transpirational, and photosynthetic changes by factors released from wounds. I. Variation potentials and putative action potentials in intact plants. Can J Bot 54:2642–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Sambeek JW, Pickard BG (1976b) Mediation of rapid electrical, metabolic transpirational, and photosynthetic changes by factors released from wounds. II. Mediation of the variation potential by Ricca’s factor. Can J Bot 54:2651–2661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vian A, Vian-Henry C, Schantz R, Ledoigt G, Frachisse JM, Desbiez MO, Julien JL (1996) Is membrane potential involved in calmodulin gene expression after external stimulation in plants? FEBS Lett 380:93–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Markin VS, Jovanov E (2007) Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing. Plant Physiol 146:694–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Markin VS (2009) Biologically closed electrical circuits in venus flytrap. Plant Physiol 149:1661–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Volkov AG, Foster JC, Ashby TA, Walker RK, Johnson JA, Markin VS (2010a) Mimosa pudica: Electrical and mechanical stimulation of plant movement. Plant Cell Environ 33:163–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Volkov AG, Foster JC, Markin VS (2010b) Signal transduction in Mimosa pudica: biologically closed electrical circuits. Plant Cell Environ 33:816–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wildon DC, Thain JF, Minchin PEH, Gubb IR, Reilly AJ, Skipper YD, Doherty HM, O’Donnell PJ, Bowles DJ (1992) Electrical signalling and systemic proteinase inhibitor induction in the wounded plant. Nature 360:62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams SE, Pickard BG (1972) Properties of action potentials in Drosera tentacles. Planta 103:222–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zimmermann MR (2010) Analyse der (elektrophysiologisch vermittelten) systemischen Signalübertragung bei Hordeum vulgare L. und Vicia faba L. Doctoral thesis, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  81. Zimmermann MR, Felle HH (2009) Dissection of heat-induced systemic signals: Superiority of ion fluxes to voltage changes in substomatal cavities. Planta 229:539–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zimmermann MR, Maischak H, Mithöfer A, Boland W, Felle HH (2009) System potentials, a novel electrical long-distance apoplastic signal in plants, induced by wounding. Plant Physiol 149:1593–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zimmermann MR, Hafke JB, van Bel AJE, Furch ACU (2013) Interaction of xylem and phloem during exudation and wound occlusion in Cucurbita maxima. Plant Cell Environ 36:237–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02571.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Botanisches Institut IJustus-Liebig-UniversitätGießenGermany
  2. 2.Bioorganische ChemieMax-Planck-Institut für Chemische ÖkologieJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations