Advertisement

Aortic Valvular Heart Disease

  • Sung Min KoEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.3k Downloads

Abstract

The aortic valve consists of three cusps, an annulus, and commissures. Aortic stenosis and regurgitation are increasing in prevalence as the population ages. Aortic stenosis is the most common form of valvular heart disease for valve replacement. Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital cardiac malformation and is at increased risk of both valvular and vascular complications. Echocardiography is the standard tool in the evaluation of aortic valve disease. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are emerging as powerful imaging tools by providing valve morphology, quantitative evaluation of valvular dysfunction, determination the hemodynamic information of valvular dysfunctions on cardiovascular structures, and anatomic information of the coronary artery and ascending thoracic aorta. The purposes of this chapter are to introduce the role of cardiac CT and MRI in the quantification of the severity of aortic valve dysfunction and to describe the imaging findings of normal anatomy, congenital abnormalities and acquired pathologic condition of the aortic valve, and prosthetic valvular dysfunction.

Keywords

Aortic Valve Aortic Stenosis Infective Endocarditis Aortic Regurgitation Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

311690_1_En_17_MOESM1_ESM.avi (7.9 mb)
Video 17.1 (AVI 8139 kb)
Video 17.2

(WMV 200 kb)

Video 17.3

(WMV 125 kb)

311690_1_En_17_MOESM4_ESM.avi (2.5 mb)
Video 17.4 (AVI 2594 kb)
311690_1_En_17_MOESM5_ESM.avi (3.4 mb)
Video 17.5 (AVI 3505 kb)
311690_1_En_17_MOESM6_ESM.avi (1.9 mb)
Video 17.6 (AVI 1991 kb)
Video 17.7

(WMV 112 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bennett CJ, Maleszewski JJ, Araoz PA. CT and MR imaging of the aortic valve: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2012;32:1399–420.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cawley PJ, Maki JH, Otto CM. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease. technique and validation. Circulation. 2009;119:468–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, et al. Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2008;118:e523–661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferda J, Linhartova K, Kreuzberg B. Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:471–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goffinet C, Kersten V, Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the severity and mechanism of aortic regurgitation using multidetector CT and MR. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:326–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Leschka S, Scheffel H, Vachenauer R, et al. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology. 2007;245:111–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Son JY, Ko SM, Choi JW, et al. Measurement of the ascending aorta diameter in patients with severe bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve stenosis using dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27 Suppl 1:61–71.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, Vogelsberg H, Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart. 2004;90:893–901.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Trindade PT, Feuchtner G, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Cardiac CT for the differentiation of bicuspid and tricuspid valves: comparison with echocardiography and surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:900–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siu SC, Silversides CK. Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2789–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Timperley J, Milner R, Marshall AJ, Gilbert TJ. Quadricuspid aortic valves. Clin Cardiol. 2002;25:548–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bricker AO, Avutu B, Mohammed TL, et al. Valsalva sinus aneurysms: findings at CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2010;30:99–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tweddell JS, Pelech AN, Frommelt PC. Ventricular septal defect and aortic valve regurgitation: pathophysiology and indications for surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2006;9:147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Han JK, Kim HK, Kim YJ, et al. Behcet’s diseases as a frequently unrecognized cause of aortic regurgitation: suggestive and misleading echocardiography findings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1269–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W, Schertler T, Bonatti J, Scheffel H, et al. Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:436–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barandon L, Clerc P, Chauvel C, et al. Native aortic valve thrombosis: a rare cause of acute ischemia of the lower limb. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2004;3:675–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y, Fu YC, Wang CC, Hsieh SR, et al. Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:857–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, Frantz S, Lange V, et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyKonkuk University HospitalSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations