Cost and Value Management for Data Quality



The cost and value of data quality have been discussed in numerous articles; however, suitable and rigor cost measures and approaches to estimate the value are rare and indeed difficult to develop. At the same time, as a critical concern to the success of organizations, the cost and value of data quality become important. Numerous business initiatives have been delayed or even cancelled, citing poor-quality data as the main concern. Previous research and practice have indicated that understanding the cost and value of data quality is a critical step to the success of information systems. This chapter provides an overview of cost and value issues related to data quality. This includes data quality cost and value identification, classification, taxonomy, and evaluation framework, as well as analysis model. Furthermore, this chapter provides a guideline for cost and value analysis related to data quality.


Data Quality Business Process Repair Cost Data Quality Improvement Poor Data Quality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Helfert M, Herrmann C (2005) Introducing data quality management in data warehousing. In: Wang RY, Madnick SE, Pierce EM, Fisher CW (eds) Information quality. Advances in management information systems, vol 1. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, pp 135–150Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batini C (2006) Monica Scannapieca data quality concepts, methodologies and techniques. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ryu K-S, Park J-S, Park J-H (2006) A data quality management maturity model. ETRI J, 28(2):191–204. doi:10.4218/etrij.06.0105.0026MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Otto B, Hüner KM, Österle H (2012) Toward a functional reference model for master data quality management, Inf Syst e-Bus Manage 10(3):395–425. ISSN:1617–9846, 09/2012Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wand Y, Wang RY (1996) Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Commun ACM 39(11):86–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung W, Olfman L (2005) An experimental study of the effects of contextual data quality and task complexity on decision performance, Information Reuse and Integration Conference, Las Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Redman T (1996) Data quality for the information age. Artech House, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang RY, Lee Y, Ziad M (2001) Data quality. Kluwer Academic, NorwellMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang RY, Strong DM (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manage Inf Syst 12(4):5–34MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strong DM, Lee YW, Wang RY (1997) Data quality in context. Commun ACM 40(5):103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher CW, Kingma BR (2001) Criticality of data quality as exemplified in two disasters. Inf Manage 39(2):109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pirani C (2004) How safe are you hospital? The Weekend AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olson JE (2003) Data quality: the accuracy dimension. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang KT, Lee Y, Wang RY (1999) Quality information and knowledge management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Redman T (1998) The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise. Commun ACM 41(2):79–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ballou DP, Pazer HL (1985) Modeling data and process quality in multi-input, multi-output information systems. Manage Sci 31(2):150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang RY (1998) A product perspective on total data quality management. Commun ACM 41(2):58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eppler M (2006) Managing information quality, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    English LP (1999) Improving data warehouse and business information quality: methods for reducing costs and increasing profits. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pipino L, Lee Y, Wang RY (2002) Data quality assessment. Commun ACM 45(4):211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eppler M, Helfert M (2004) A classification and analysis of data quality costs. In: 9th MIT international conference on information quality, November 5–6, 2004, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fisher T (2009) The data asset: how smart companies govern their data for business success. Wiley, New Jersey, p 220Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anderson T (2005) The penalties of poor data, 2005. Whitepaper published by and the Data Warehousing Institute
  24. 24.
    O’Brien T (2009) Quality counts - why poor data quality can cost you money and also have legal implications. Governance and Compliance.
  25. 25.
    Haug A, Zachariassen F, van Liempd D (2011) The costs of poor data quality, J Ind Eng Manage 4(2):168–193Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garvin DA (1988) Managing quality. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lesca H, Lesca E (1995) Gestion de l’information: qualité de l’information et performances de l’entrerpise. LITEC, Les essentiels de la gestionGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oliveira P, Rodrigues F, Henriques P (2005) A formal definition of data quality problems. In: 11th international conference on information quality, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keller KL, Staelin R (1987), Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. J Consum Res 14(2):200–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Savchenko S (2003) Automating objective data quality assessment. In: 8th international conference on information quality, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ballou DP, Tayi GK (1989) Methodology for allocating resources for data quality enhancement. Commun ACM 32(3):320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chengalur-Smith IN, Ballou DP, Pazer HL (1999) The impact of data quality information on decision making: an exploratory analysis. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 11(6):853–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gustafsson P, et al (2008) Quantifying IT impacts on organizational structure and business value with Extended Influence Diagrams. In: Stirna J, Persson A (eds) The practice of enterprise modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 15, pp 138–152Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Borek A, Helfert M, Ge M, Parlikad AK (2011) An information oriented framework for relating IS resources and business value. In: Proceedings of the international conference on enterprise information systems, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ge M, Helfert M (2008) Effects of information quality on inventory management. Int J Inf Qual 2(2):176–191Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eppler MJ, Mengis J (2003) The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inf Soc Int J 20(5):1–20Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neumann S, Hadass M (1980) DSS and strategic decisions. Calif Manage Rev 22(2):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Janis I, Mann L (1977) Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitments, The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1988) Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 14(3):534–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: a review and analysis. Acad Manage Rev 13(1):40–52Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fisher CW, Chengalur-Smith I, Ballou DP (2003) The impact of experience and time on the use of data quality information in decision making. Inf Syst Res 14(2):170–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Svenson O, Edland A, Slovic P (1990) Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressure. Acta Psychol 75:153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shankaranarayan G, Ziad M, Wang RY (2003) Managing data quality in dynamic decision environments: an information product approach. J Data Manage 14(4):14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burleson BR, Levine BJ, Samter W (1984) Decision making procedure and decision quality. Hum Commun Res 10:557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Remus W (1984) An investigation of the impact of graphical and tabular data presentations on decision making. Manage Sci 30(5):533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Porter ME, Millar V (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv Bus Rev 63(4):149–160Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mooney JG, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (1996) A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. ACM SIGMIS Database 27(2):68–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value. MIS Q 28(2):283–322Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Van Wegen B, De Hoog R (1996) Measuring the economic value of information systems. J Inf Technol 11(3):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Feigenbaum AV (1956) Total quality control. Harv Bus Rev 34:93–101Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Even A, Shankaranarayanan G (2009) Utility cost perspectives in data quality management. J Comput Inf Syst 50(2):127–135Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Even A, Shankaranarayanan G, Berger PD (2010) Evaluating a model for cost-effective data quality management in a real-world CRM setting. Decis Support Syst 50(1):152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Otto B, Hüner KM (2009) A meta-model for data quality management simulation. In: 14th international conference on information quality, Potsdam.
  56. 56.
    Borek A, Helfert M, Ge M, Parlikad AK (2011) IS resources and business value: operationalisation of an information oriented framework. In: Enterprise information systems - revised selected papers. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Klassen V, Borek A, Kern R, Parlikad AK (2012) Quantifying the business impact of information quality - a risk based approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cappiello C, Francalanci C (2002) Considerations about costs deriving from a poor data quality. DaQuinCIS Project Report, December 2002Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gryna FM (1998) Quality and costs. In: Juran JM, Godfrey AB (eds) Juran’s quality handbook, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Segev A, Wang R (2001) Data quality challenges in enabling eBusiness transformation. In: Pierce E, Katz-Haas R (eds) Proceedings of the sixth MIT information quality conference, 2001, Boston, MA, pp 83–91Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ahituv N, Igbaria M, Stella A (1998) The effects of time pressure and completeness of information on decision making. J Manage Inf Syst 15(2):153–172Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ballou DP, Pazer HL (1990) A framework for the analysis of error conjunctive, multi-criteria, satisfying decision processes. Decis Sci 21(4):752–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fehrenbacher DD, Helfert M (2012) Contextual factors influencing perceived importance and trade-offs of information quality. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 30:Article 8Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Klein BD, Goodhue DL, Davis GB (1997) Can humans detect errors in data? Impact of base rates, incentives, and goals. MIS Q 21(2):169–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kim W, Choi B (2003) Towards quantifying data quality costs. J Object Technol 2(4):69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lee Y, Strong DM, Kahn B, Wang RY (2002) AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Inf Manage 40(2):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Letzring TD, Wells SM, Funder DC (2006) Information quantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personality judgment. J Personal Soc Psychol 91(1):111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Neus A (2001) Managing information quality in virtual communities of practice: lessons learned from a decade’s experience with exploding Internet communication. In: Pierce E, Katz-Haas R (eds) Proceedings of the sixth MIT information quality conference, 2001, Boston, MA, pp 119–131Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Raghunathan S (1999) Impact of information quality and decision-maker quality on decision quality: a theoretical model and simulation analysis. Decis Support Syst 26(4):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Verykios VS, Elfeky MG, Elmagarmid AK, Cochinwala M, Dalal S (2000) On the accuracy and completeness of the record matching process. In: Klein BD, Rossin DF (eds) Proceedings of the 5th international conference on information quality, MIT, BostonGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wang RY, Storey VC, Firth CP (1995) A framework for analysis of data quality research. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 7(4):623–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität der Bundeswehr MunichNeubiberg (Munich)Germany
  2. 2.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations