Multi-Touch pp 339-367

Part of the Xpert.press book series (XPERT.PRESS) | Cite as

Berührpunkte mit der Visualisierung

  • Florian Haag
  • Tanja Blascheck
  • Bernhard Schmitz
  • Michael Raschke
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel widmet sich den Besonderheiten von Visualisierungen, die durch Multi-Touch-Bedienung gesteuert werden können. Einführend in das Kapitel wird das Gebiet der Visualisierung und drei wichtige Teilbereiche davon – Wissenschaftliche Visualisierung, Informationsvisualisierung und Visual Analytics – vorgestellt. Anschließend wird auf unterschiedliche für interaktive Visualisierungen eingesetzte Gerätetypen eingegangen. Basierend auf diesem Grundwissen werden besondere Gesichtspunkte beim Entwurf von Visualisierungen und den dazugehörigen Interaktionen im Hinblick auf (Multi-)Touch-Bedienung hervorgehoben. Abschließend werden die genannten Punkte in einem Praxisbeispiel konkretisiert.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Accot, J., Zhai, S.: Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’99, S. 466–472. ACM, New York (1999). doi: 10.1145/302979.303133. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/302979.303133
  2. 2.
    Alallah, F., Jin, D., Irani, P.: OA-graphs: orientation agnostic graphs for improving the legibility of charts on horizontal displays. In: ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS ’10, S. 211–220. ACM, New York (2010). doi: 10.1145/1936652.1936692. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1936652.1936692
  3. 3.
    Albinsson, P.A., Zhai, S.: High precision touch screen interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’03, S. 105–112. ACM, New York (2003). doi: 10.1145/642611.642631. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642631
  4. 4.
    Balali Moghaddam, A., Svendsen, J., Tory, M., Branzan Albu, A.: Integrating touch and near touch interactions for information visualizations. In: CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’11, S. 2347–2352. ACM, New York (2011). doi: 10.1145/1979742.1979934. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1979742.1979934
  5. 5.
    Bau, O., Mackay, W.E.: OctoPocus: a dynamic guide for learning gesture-based command sets. In: UIST, S. 37–46. LRI, Université Paris-Sud, INRIA (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1449715.1449724
  6. 6.
    Benko, H., Wilson, A.D., Baudisch, P.: Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’06, S. 1263–1272. ACM, New York (2006). doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124963. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124963
  7. 7.
    Bier, E.A., Freeman, S.: MMM: a user interface architecture for shared editors on a single screen. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’91, S. 79–86. ACM, New York (1991). doi: 10.1145/120782.120791. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/120782.120791
  8. 8.
    Bier, E.A., Stone, M.C., Pier, K., Buxton, W., DeRose, T.D.: Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH ’93, S. 73–80. ACM, New York (1993). doi: 10.1145/166117.166126. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/166117.166126
  9. 9.
    Buxton, W., Hill, R., Rowley, P.: Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Ttechniques, SIGGRAPH ’85, S. 215–224. ACM, New York (1985). doi: 10.1145/325334.325239. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/325334.325239
  10. 10.
    Douglas, S.A., Kirkpatrick, A.E., MacKenzie, I.S.: Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the iso 9241, part 9 standard. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’99, S. 215–222. ACM, New York (1999). doi: 10.1145/302979.303042. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/302979.303042
  11. 11.
    Dragicevic, P., Shi, Y.: Visualizing and manipulating automatic document orientation methods using vector fields. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS ’09, S. 65–68. ACM, New York (2009). doi: 10.1145/1731903.1731918. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1731903.1731918
  12. 12.
    Earnshaw, R.: Scientific Visualization, Techniques and Applications. Chap. Introduction, S. 1. Springer (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Esenther, A., Ryall, K.: Fluid DTMouse: better mouse support for touch-based interactions. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI ’06, S. 112–115. ACM, New York (2006). doi: 10.1145/1133265.1133289. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133265.1133289
  14. 14.
    Ferraro, F.R., Kellas, G.: Age-related changes in the effects of target orientation on word recognition. J. Gerontol. 47(4), 279–280 (1992). doi: 10.1093/geronj/47.4.P279. http://geronj.oxfordjournals.org/content/47/4/P279.abstract Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Friedhoff, R., Kiely, T.: The eye of the beholder. Comput. Graph. World 13(8), 46–56 (1990)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haber, R., McNabb, D.A.: Visualization idioms: a conceptual model for scientific visualization systems. In: Visualization in Scientific Computing, S. 74–93 (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamming, R.W.: Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. Preface, S. v. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. (1962)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hinrichs, U., Carpendale, S., Scott, S.D., Pattison, E.: Interface currents: supporting fluent collaboration on tabletop displays. In: Butz A., Fisher B., Krüger A., Olivier P. (Hrsg.) Smart Graphics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 3638, S. 185–197. Springer, Berlin (2005). doi: 10.1007/11536482_16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11536482_16
  19. 19.
    Islam, M.A., Haque, A.K.M.F., Ali, M.S., Ahmed, M.: Design and development of a cost effective laser ray touch screen technology. Bangladesh Electronic Society 11, 51–56 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson, E.A.: Touch displays: a programmed man-machine interface. Ergonomics 10(2), 271–277 (1967). doi: 10.1080/00140136708930868. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00140136708930868
  21. 21.
    Karlson, A.K., Bederson, B.B.: Thumbspace: generalized one-handed input for touchscreen-based mobile devices. In: Baranauskas C., Palanque P., Abascal J., Barbosa S. (Hrsg.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 4662, S. 324–338. Springer, Berlin (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74796-3_30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74796-3_30
  22. 22.
    Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.D., G"org, C., Kohlhammer, J., Melançon, G.: Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: Kerren A., Stasko J., Fekete J.D., North C. (Hrsg.) Information Visualization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 4950, S. 154–175. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Long, J., Whitefield, A., Dennett, J.: The effect of display format on the direct entry of numerical information by pointing. J. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. 26(1), 3–17 (1984). doi: 10.1177/001872088402600102. http://hfs.sagepub.com/content/26/1/3.abstract
  24. 24.
    McCormick, B.H., DeFanti, T.A., Brown, M.D.: Visualization in scientific computing. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 21(6), 3 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McMillan, G.R.: The technology and applications of gesture-based control. In: RTO-EN-003 – Alternative Control Technologies: Human Factors Issues. NATO Science and Technology Organization (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Microsoft: Microsoft PixelSense. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/pixelsense/default.aspx (2012)
  27. 27.
    Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft Surface User Experience Guidelines, User Interaction and Design Guidelines for Creating Microsoft Surface Applications (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moreland, K.: A survey of visualization pipelines. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(3), 367–378 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.133 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morris, M.R., Huang, A., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T.: Cooperative gestures: multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’06, S. 1201–1210. ACM, New York (2006). doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124952. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124952
  30. 30.
    Morris, M.R., Paepcke, A., Winograd, T., Stamberger, J.: Teamtag: exploring centralized versus replicated controls for co-located tabletop groupware. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’06, S. 1273–1282. ACM, New York (2006). doi: 10.1145/1124772.1124964. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124964
  31. 31.
    Nuance: Swype. http://www.swype.com/ (2012)
  32. 32.
    Ostroff, D., Shneiderman, B.: Selection devices for user of an electronic encyclopedia: an empirical comparison of four possibilities. Inf. Process. Manage. 24(6), 665–680 (1988). doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(88)90004-0. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306457388900040
  33. 33.
    Pfleging, B., Raschke, M., Püttmann, E., Ploner, N.: Powerwall interactions. In: CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’11. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pickering, J.: Touch-sensitive screens: the technologies and their application. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 25(3), 249–269 (1986). doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80060-8. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020737386800608
  35. 35.
    Potter, R.L., Weldon, L.J., Shneiderman, B.: Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’88, S. 27–32. ACM, New York (1988). doi: 10.1145/57167.57171. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/57167.57171
  36. 36.
    Preim, B.: Entwicklung interaktiver Systeme, Kap. 6, S. 117. Springer (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ritchie, G., Turner, J.: Input devices for interactive graphics. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 7(5), 639–660 (1975). doi: 10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80024-1. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020737375800241
  38. 38.
    Roudaut, A., Huot, S., Lecolinet, E.: TapTap and MagStick: improving one-handed target acquisition on small touch-screens. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI ’08, S. 146–153. ACM, New York (2008). doi: 10.1145/1385569.1385594. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1385569.1385594
  39. 39.
    Scott, S., Grant, K., Mandryk, R.: System guidelines for co-located, collaborative work on a tabletop display. In: Kuutti, K., Karsten, E., Fitzpatrick, G., Dourish, P., Schmidt, K. (Hrsg.) ECSCW 2003, S. 159–178. Springer, Netherlands (2003). doi: 10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_9
  40. 40.
    Shen, C., Vernier, F.D., Forlines, C., Ringel, M.: DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’04, S. 167–174. ACM, New York (2004). doi: 10.1145/985692.985714. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985714
  41. 41.
    Shneiderman, B.: The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, S. 336–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307 (1996)
  42. 42.
    Tandler, P., Prante, T., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Streitz, N., Steinmetz, R.: Connectables: dynamic coupling of displays for the flexible creation of shared workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’01, S. 11–20. ACM, New York (2001). doi: 10.1145/502348.502351. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/502348.502351
  43. 43.
    Thom, D., Bosch, H., Koch, S., Wörner, M., Ertl, T.: Spatiotemporal anomaly detection through visual analysis of geolocated twitter messages. In: Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2012 IEEE, S. 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2012.6183572 (2012)
  44. 44.
    Tobiasz, M., Isenberg, P., Carpendale, S.: Lark: coordinating co-located collaboration with information visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 15(6), 1065–1072 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.162 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Victoria and Albert Museum: Tray with board game pattern from the 18th century. http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O341883/tray-unknown/ (2012)
  46. 46.
    Vogel, D., Baudisch, P.: Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’07, S. 657–666. ACM, New York (2007). doi: 10.1145/1240624.1240727. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1240624.1240727
  47. 47.
    Wang, F., Ren, X.: Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’09, S. 1063–1072. ACM, New York (2009). doi: 10.1145/1518701.1518864. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518864
  48. 48.
    Whalen, T.: Playing well with others: applying board game design to tabletop display interfaces. In: UIST ’03 – Adjunct Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wigdor, D., Balakrishnan, R.: Empirical investigation into the effect of orientation on text readability in tabletop displays. In: Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Mackay, W. (Hrsg.) ECSCW 2005, S. 205–224. Springer, Netherlands (2005). doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_11
  50. 50.
    Wong, P.C., Thomas, J.: Visual analytics. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 24(5), 20–21 (2004). doi: 10.1109/MCG.2004.39 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wu, M., Balakrishnan, R.: Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In: Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’03, S. 193–202. ACM, New York (2003). doi: 10.1145/964696.964718. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964696.964718
  52. 52.
    Xu, W., Yu, C., Shi, Y.: Regionalsliding: enhancing target selection on touchscreen-based mobile devices. In: CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’11, S. 1261–1266. ACM, New York (2011). doi: 10.1145/1979742.1979758. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1979742.1979758
  53. 53.
    Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O.: \(\text{ SHARK }^2\): A large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers. In: UIST, S. 43–52. IBM Almaden Research Center  http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029640 (2004)
  54. 54.
    Zhang, H., Yang, X.D., Ens, B., Liang, H.N., Boulanger, P., Irani, P.: See me, see you: a lightweight method for discriminating user touches on tabletop displays. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’12, S. 2327–2336. ACM, New York (2012). doi: 10.1145/2208276.2208392. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2208276.2208392

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Haag
    • 1
  • Tanja Blascheck
    • 1
  • Bernhard Schmitz
    • 1
  • Michael Raschke
    • 1
  1. 1.Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Visualisierung und Interaktive Systeme StuttgartDeutschland

Personalised recommendations