CSMO 2011: System Modeling and Optimization pp 155-164 | Cite as
Robustness Analysis of Stochastic Programs with Joint Probabilistic Constraints
Conference paper
Abstract
Due to their frequently observed lack of convexity and/or smoothness, stochastic programs with joint probabilistic constraints have been considered as a hard type of constrained optimization problems, which are rather demanding both from the computational and robustness point of view. Dependence of the set of solutions on the probability distribution rules out the straightforward construction of the convexity-based global contamination bounds for the optimal value; at least local results for probabilistic programs of a special structure will be derived. Several alternative approaches to output analysis will be mentioned.
Keywords
Joint probabilistic constraints contamination technique output analysis Download
to read the full conference paper text
References
- 1.Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer, New York (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Nondegeneracy and quantitative stability of parametrized optimization problems with multiple solutions. SIAM J. Optim. 8, 940–946 (1998)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Branda, M., Dupačová, J.: Approximation and contamination bounds for probabilistic programs. Ann. Oper. Res. 193, 3–19 (2012)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dupačová, J.: Stability in stochastic programming with recourse – contaminated distributions. Math. Program. Study 27, 133–144 (1986)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dupačová, J.: Stability in stochastic programming – probabilistic constraints. In: Arkin, V.I., Shiraev, A., Wets, R. (eds.) Stochastic Optimization. LNCIS, vol. 81, pp. 314–325. Springer, Berlin (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dupačová, J.: Stochastic programming with incomplete information: A survey of results on postoptimization and sensitivity analysis. Optimization 18, 507–532 (1987)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dupačová, J.: Stability and sensitivity analysis in stochastic programming. Ann. Oper. Res. 27, 115–142 (1990)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Dupačová, J.: Scenario based stochastic programs: Resistance with respect to sample. Ann. Oper. Res. 64, 21–38 (1996)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Dupačová, J.: Reflections on robust optimization. In: Marti, K., Kall, P. (eds.) Stochastic Programming Methods and Technical Applications. LNEMS, vol. 437, pp. 111–127. Springer, Berlin (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dupačová, J.: Uncertainties in minimax stochastic programs. Optimization 60, 1235–1250 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dupačová, J., Kopa, M.: Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 200, 55–77 (2012), doi:10.1007/s10479-010-0824-9MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dupačová, J., Polívka, J.: Stress testing for VaR and CVaR. Quantitiative Finance 7, 411–421 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fiacco, A.V.: Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming. Academic Press, New York (1983)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 14.Gauvin, J., Dubeau, F.: Differential properties of the marginal function in mathematical programming. Math. Program. Study 19, 101–119 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Henrion, R.: Perturbation analysis of chance-constrained programs under variation of all constraint data. In: Marti, K., et al. (eds.) Dynamic Stochastic Optimization. LNEMS, vol. 532, pp. 257–274. Springer, Berlin (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Henrion, R., Römisch, W.: Hölder and Lipschitz stability of solution sets in programs with probabilistic constraints. Math. Program. 100, 589–611 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kyparisis, J., Fiacco, A.: Generalized convexity and concavity of the optimal value function in nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 39, 285–304 (1987)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Pagoncelli, B.K., Ahmed, S., Shapiro, A.: Sample average approximation method for chance constrained programming: Theory and applications. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 142, 399–416 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Pflug, G., Wozabal, D.: Ambiguity in portfolio selection. Quant. Fin. 7, 435–442 (2007)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Prékopa, A.: Logarithmic concave measures with application to stochastic programming. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 32, 301–316 (1971)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 21.Prékopa, A.: Stochastic Programming. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht (1995)Google Scholar
- 22.Prékopa, A.: Probabilistic Programming. In: [27], ch. 5, pp. 267–351Google Scholar
- 23.Robinson, S.M.: Local structure of feasible sets in nonlinear programming, part II: Nondegeneracy. Math. Program. Study 22, 217–230 (1984)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Robinson, S.M.: Local structure of feasible sets in nonlinear programming, Part III: Stability and sensitivity. Math. Program. Study 30, 45–66 (1987)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Römisch, W.: Stability of stochastic programming problems. In: [27], ch. 8, pp. 483–554Google Scholar
- 26.Römisch, W., Schultz, R.: Stability analysis for stochastic programs. Ann. Oper. Res. 30, 241–266 (1991)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Ruszczyński, A., Shapiro, A. (eds.): Stochastic Programming. Handbooks in OR & MS, vol. 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 28.Shapiro, A.: Sensitivity analysis of nonlinear programs and differentiability properties of metric projections. SIAM J. Control and Optimization 26, 628–645 (1988)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Shapiro, A.: On differential stability in stochastic programming. Math. Program. 47, 107–116 (1990)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Shapiro, A.: Monte Carlo sampling methods. In: [27], ch. 6, pp. 353–425Google Scholar
- 31.Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming. SIAM and MPS, Philadelphia (2009)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.van Ackooij, W., Henrion, R., Möller, A., Zorgati, R.: On joint probabilistic constraints with Gaussian coefficient matrix. Operations Research Letters 39, 99–102 (2011)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Zymler, S., Kuhn, D., Rustem, B.: Distributionally robust joint chance constraints with second-order moment information. Math. Program., Ser. A (published online November 10, 2011)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013