Enterprise Architectures for Addressing Sustainability Silos

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

A need exists for behaviour change and transparency in modern organisations where the focus needs to shift towards sustainability thinking rather than just sustainability reporting for compliance reasons. The number of organisations which are undertaking Green Initiatives and reporting on sustainability are increasing. However, many of these organisations are not viewing these initiatives strategically. The effect on information requirements and business processes is often not considered and the available tools and technologies are not used to their full potential. As a result, whilst sustainability reports are produced, the underlying infrastructure consists of “sustainability silos” comprising of a lack of integrated systems, inconsistent data and information where the integrity is not reliable. In order to address these issues this study investigates the extent to which organisations consider environmental information requirements and processes when planning their information systems and Enterprise Architecture (EA). The inclusion of Green Initiative strategies into the design of an organisation’s enterprise systems and EA is proposed. This will ensure alignment between environmental management and IT planning and result in integrated systems, an improved sustainability reporting process and more effective decision making regarding the environmental impact of organisations.

Keywords

Enterprise Architecture Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Environmental Reporting Green Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: Win–Win–Win Business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36(2):90–100Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    GRI (2011) Sustainability reporting guidelines © 2000–2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Solsbach A, Isenmann R, Marx Gómez J (2010) Network publicity—an approach to sustainability reporting from a network view. In: International society for ecological economics 11th biennial conference: advancing sustainability in a time of crisisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ernst and Young (2012) Six growing trends in corporate sustainability. Available at: http://www.ey.com/US/en/Services/Specialty-Services/Climate-Change-and-Sustainability-Services/Six-growing-trends-in-corporate-sustainability_overview. Accessed 10 June 2012
  5. 5.
    Magoulas T, Hadzic A, Saarikko T, Pessi K (2012) Alignment in enterprise architecture: A comparative analysis of four architectural approaches. Elect J Info Sys Eval 15(1):88–101Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlson R, Erixon M, Forsberg P, Pålsson A (2001) System for integrated business environmental information management. Adv Environ Res 5:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scholtz B, Calitz A, Eastes B (2012) A balanced scorecard for sustainability reporting a balanced scorecard for sustainability reporting. The 6th business international conference: economic, social and technological environment, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein J, Gagliardi M (2010) A workshop on analysis and evaluation of enterprise architectures. Software Engineering Institute, p 429Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO, 2011. ISO/IEC/IEEE. ISO/IEC/IEEE FDIS 42010: 2011 standard.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG) (2011) Integrated reporting. Performance insight through better business reporting—issue 1. Available from: http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/road-to-integrated-reporting.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2011
  11. 11.
    Deloitte and Touche (2002) Deloitte sustainability reporting scorecardGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Speshock CH (2010) Empowering green initiatives with IT: a strategy and implementation guide. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rea MH (2012) KING III and GRI + 13, 2012 review of sustainability reporting in South Africa as per the global reporting initiative (GRI) guidelines. Integrated reporting and assurance services (IRAS)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scholtz B, Connolley A, Solsbach A (2012) A gap analysis for environmental reporting at a South African manufacturing company. The 6th business international conference: economic, social and technological environment, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Velitchkov I (2008) Integration of IT strategy and enterprise architecture models. Paper presented at the international conference on computer systems and technologies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang X, Zhou X, Jiang L (2008) A method of business and IT alignment based on enterprise architecture. Service operations and logistics. IEEE international conference, pp 740–745Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross JW, Weill P, Robertson DC (2006) Enterprise architecture as strategy. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baltzan P, Phillips A, Haag S (2009) Business driven technology with premium content, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Butler JB, Henderson SC, Raiborn C (2011) Sustainability and the balanced scorecard: integrating green measures into business reporting. Manag Account Q 12 (2):1–10. (Winter 2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Solsbach A, Süpke D, Wagner B, Marx Gómez J (2011) Sustainable online reporting model—a web based sustainability reporting software. Environ Sci Eng 3(Part 2):165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Athanasiadis IN (2006) By interweaving and interpreting data streams, AISLE can bring crucial environmental information to a wider audience. Lect Notes Comput Sci 34–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenda Scholtz
    • 1
  • Anthea Connolley
    • 1
  • Andre Calitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityPort ElizabethSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations