The Tale of SOLOIST: A Specification Language for Service Compositions Interactions

  • Domenico Bianculli
  • Carlo Ghezzi
  • Pierluigi San Pietro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7684)


Service-based applications are a new class of software systems that provide the basis for enterprises to build their information systems by following the principles of service-oriented architectures. These software systems are often realized by orchestrating remote, third-party services, to provide added-values applications that are called service compositions. The distributed ownership and the evolving nature of the services involved in a service composition make verification activities crucial. On a par with verification is also the problem of formally specifying the interactions–with third-party services–of service compositions, with the related issue of balancing expressiveness and support for automated verification.

This paper showcases SOLOIST, a specification language for formalizing the interactions of service compositions. SOLOIST has been designed with the primary objective of expressing the most significant specification patterns found in the specifications of service-based applications. The language is based on a many-sorted first-order metric temporal logic, extended with new temporal modalities that support aggregate operators for events occurring in a certain time window. We also show how, under certain assumptions, the language can be reduced to linear temporal logic, paving the way for using SOLOIST with established verification techniques, both at design time and at run time.


Time Window Temporal Logic Service Composition Service Level Agreement Observation Interval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    de Alfaro, L.: Temporal Logics for the Specification of Performance and Reliability. In: Reischuk, R., Morvan, M. (eds.) STACS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1200, pp. 165–176. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews, T., et al.: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.1 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baresi, L., Bianculli, D., Ghezzi, C., Guinea, S., Spoletini, P.: Validation of web service compositions. IET Softw. 1(6), 219–232 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baresi, L., Di Nitto, E. (eds.): Test and Analysis of Web Services. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baresi, L., Di Nitto, E., Ghezzi, C.: Toward open-world software: Issue and challenges. IEEE Computer 39(10), 36–43 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basin, D., Klaedtke, F., Müller, S.: Policy Monitoring in First-Order Temporal Logic. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauer, A., Goré, R., Tiu, A.: A First-Order Policy Language for History-Based Transaction Monitoring. In: Leucker, M., Morgan, C. (eds.) ICTAC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5684, pp. 96–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bianculli, D., Ghezzi, C., Pautasso, C., Senti, P.: Specification patterns from research to industry: a case study in service-based applications. In: Proc. of ICSE 2012, pp. 968–976. IEEE Computer Society (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boker, U., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, T.A., Kupferman, O.: Temporal specifications with accumulative values. In: Proc. of LICS 2011, pp. 43–52. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canfora, G., Di Penta, M.: Service-Oriented Architectures Testing: A Survey. In: De Lucia, A., Ferrucci, F. (eds.) ISSSE 2006-2008. LNCS, vol. 5413, pp. 78–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deutsch, A., Sui, L., Vianu, V.: Specification and verification of data-driven web applications. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 73(3), 442–474 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dwyer, M.B., Avrunin, G.S., Corbett, J.C.: Property specification patterns for finite-state verification. In: Proc. of FMSP 1998, pp. 7–15. ACM (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finkbeiner, B., Sankaranarayanan, S., Sipma, H.: Collecting statistics over runtime executions. Formal Methods in System Design 27, 253–274 (2005)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gauci, A., Pace, G.J., Colombo, C.: Statistics and runtime verification. Tech. rep., University of Malta (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghezzi, C., Guinea, S.: Run-time monitoring in service-oriented architectures. In: Baresi, Di Nitto [4] pp. 237–264Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Patterns for timed property specifications. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 153(2), 117–133 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hallé, S., Villemaire, R.: Runtime monitoring of message-based workflows with data. In: Proc. of EDOC 2008, pp. 63–72. IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hallé, S., Villemaire, R., Cherkaoui, O.: Specifying and validating data-aware temporal web service properties. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(5), 669–683 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hella, L., Libkin, L., Nurmonen, J., Wong, L.: Logics with aggregate operators. J. ACM 48, 880–907 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Josuttis, N.: SOA in Practice: The Art of Distributed System Design. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kamp, H.W.: Tense Logic and the Theory of Linear Order. PhD thesis, University of California at Los Angeles, USA (1968)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Keller, A., Ludwig, H.: The WSLA framework: specifying and monitoring service level agreement for web services. J. Netw. Syst. Manage. 11(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Konrad, S., Cheng, B.H.C.: Real-time specification patterns. In: Proc. of ICSE 2005, pp. 372–381. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Gen. Comput. 4, 67–95 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laroussinie, F., Meyer, A., Petonnet, E.: Counting LTL. In: Proc. of TIME 2010, pp. 51–58. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laroussinie, F., Meyer, A., Petonnet, E.: Counting CTL. In: Ong, L. (ed.) FOSSACS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6014, pp. 206–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mahbub, K., Spanoudakis, G.: Monitoring WS-Agreements: An event calculus-based approach. In: Baresi, Di Nitto [4], pp. 265–306Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Müller, C., Martín-Díaz, O., Ruiz-Cortés, A., Resinas, M., Fernández, P.: Improving Temporal-Awareness of WS-Agreement. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 193–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Papazoglou, M.P.: The Challenges of Service Evolution. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pelov, N., Denecker, M., Bruynooghe, M.: Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 7(3), 301–353 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pradella, M., Morzenti, A., San Pietro, P.: The symmetry of the past and of the future: bi-infinite time in the verification of temporal properties. In: Proc. of ESEC-FSE 2007, pp. 312–320. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pradella, M., Morzenti, A., San Pietro, P.: A Metric Encoding for Bounded Model Checking. In: Cavalcanti, A., Dams, D.R. (eds.) FM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5850, pp. 741–756. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rabinovich, A.: Complexity of Metric Temporal Logics with Counting and the Pnueli Modalities. In: Cassez, F., Jard, C. (eds.) FORMATS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5215, pp. 93–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raimondi, F., Skene, J., Emmerich, W.: Efficient online monitoring of web-service slas. In: Proc. of SIGSOFT 2008/FSE-16, pp. 170–180. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Salaün, G.: Analysis and verification of service interaction protocols - a brief survey. In: Proc. of TAV-WEB 2010. EPTCS, vol. 35, pp. 75–86 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Domenico Bianculli
    • 1
  • Carlo Ghezzi
    • 2
  • Pierluigi San Pietro
    • 2
  1. 1.SnT CentreUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourg
  2. 2.DEI - DEEP-SE GroupPolitecnico di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations