Modeling Archives by Means of OAI-ORE

  • Nicola Ferro
  • Gianmaria Silvello
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 354)


Currently, archival practice is moving towards the definition of complex relationships between the resources of interest as well as the constitution of compound digital objects. To this end archives can take advantage of using the Open Archives Initiative - Object Reuse and Exchange (OAI-ORE) providing additional and flexible visualizations of archival resources.

In this paper we define a formal basis that provides a means for defining OAI-ORE instances which are consistent with the fundamental archival principles.


Digital Library Digital Object Modeling Archive Sample Archive Archival Description 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Agosti, A., Ferro, N., Silvello, G.: The NESTOR Framework: Manage, Access and Exchange Hierarchical Data Structures. In: Proceedings of the 18th Italian Symposium on Advanced Database Systems, pp. 242–253. Società Editrice Esculapio, Bologna (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C., Van de Sompel, H.: The Europeana Data Model (EDM). In: IFLA 2011: World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Gothenburg, Sweden (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science. In: American Archivists and Association of Canadian Archivists. Association with Scarecrow Press, Lanham (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferro, N., Silvello, G.: A Methodology for Sharing Archival Descriptive Metadata in a Distributed Environment. In: Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., Castelli, D., Ammitzbøll Jurik, B., Lippincott, J. (eds.) ECDL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5173, pp. 268–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferro, N., Silvello, G.: The NESTOR Framework: How to Handle Hierarchical Data Structures. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 215–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilliland-Swetland, A.J.: Enduring Paradigm, New Opportunities: The Value of the Archival Perspective in the Digital Environment. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hennicke, S., de Boer, V., Isaac, A., Olensky, M., Wielemaker, J.: Conversion of EAD into EDM Linked Data. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Semantic Digital Archives, SDA 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jech, T.: Set Theory. Springer, Berlin (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaplan, D., Sauer, A., Wilczek, E.: Archival Description in OAI-ORE. In: OR 2010: The 5th Int. Conf. on Open Repositories (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knuth, D.E.: The Art of Computer Programming, 3rd edn., vol. 1. Addison Wesley, Reading (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lagoze, C., Van de Sompel, H., Johnston, P., Nelson, M., Sanderson, R., Warner, S.: ORE Specification-Abstract Data Model. Technical report, OAI (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Light, M., Hyry, T.: Colophons and Annotations: New Directions for the Finding Aids. The American Archivists 65, 216–230 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metadata Standards Subcommittee OAC Working Group. OAC Best Practice Guidelines for EAD. Version 2.0. Technical report, 61 pages (April 2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    University of California. California Digital Library. CDL Guidelines for Digital Objects. Version 2.0. Technical report, 34 pages (January 2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearce-Moses, R.: Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology. Society of American Archivists (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pepe, A., Mayernik, M., Borgman, C., Van de Sompel, H.: From Artifacts to Aggregations: Modeling Scientific Life Cycles on the Semantic Web. JASIST (J. of the American Society for Inf. Science and Technology) 61, 567–582 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description. An Introduction and Overview. D-Lib Magazine 5(11) (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross, S.: Digital Preservation, Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries. In: Keynote Address at the 11th European Conf. on Digital Libraries (ECDL), Budapest (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugimoto, G., van Dongen, W.: Archival Digital Object Ingestion into Europeana (ESE-EAD Harmonization). Technical report, Europeana v1.0 (August 2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van de Sompel, H., Lagoze, C.: Interoperability for the Discovery, Use, and Re-Use of Units of Scholarly Communication. CT Watch Quarterly 3(3) (August 2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Ferro
    • 1
  • Gianmaria Silvello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations