Advertisement

Designing Learning to Research the Formal Concept Analysis of Transactional Data

  • Martin Watmough
  • Simon Polovina
  • Simon Andrews
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7735)

Abstract

Transactional systems are core to much business activity; however leveraging any advantage from the data in these enterprise systems remains a challenging task for businesses. To research and discover the hidden semantics in transactional data, Sheffield Hallam University has incorporated Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) into two of its degree courses. We present a learning, teaching and assessment (LTA) method that integrates with this research. To make it reflect industrial practice and to further the state of the art of the research, this method includes the use of ERPsim. This large scale, real-world business simulation software is based on the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) enterprise system by SAP A.G., a global business software vendor. Together with a mix of individual and group work approaches, FCA tools (namely FCA BedRock, In-Close and Concept Explorer) and comparisons with alternative approaches, it is emerging that FCA can fulfil an important role in transactional systems and enhance its role in Business Intelligence (BI).

Keywords

FCA (Formal Concept Analysis) LTA (Learning, Teaching and Assessment) ERPsim (ERP Simulation Software) BI (Business Intelligence) Transactional Data 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wille, R.: Conceptual Graphs and Formal Concept Analysis, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt and Fachbereich Mathematik. Springer (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolff, K.R.: A First Course in Formal Concept Analysis. In: Faulbaum, F. (ed.) SoftStat 1993. Advances in Statistical Software, vol. 4, pp. 429–438. Gustac Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    SAP, About SAP AG (2012), http://www.sap.com/about-sap/about-sap.epx (cited October 8, 2012)
  4. 4.
    Leger, P.-M., Robert, J., Babin, G., Pellerin, R., Wagner, B.: ERPsim, ERPsim Lab, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Qc (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feldstein, H.: Interview with Harvey Feldstein ERPsim (2011), http://erpsim.hec.ca/learning/#/curriculum/153 (viewed August 20, 2012)
  6. 6.
    Leger, P.-M., Robert, J., Babin, G., Pellerin, R., Lyle, D., et al.: ERP Simulation Game with SAP ERP: Logistics Game (Platinum Version), ERPsim Lab, HEC Montréal, 44 p. (2011) ISBN: 978-0-9866653-2-5Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hillen, H., Scherpbier, A., Wijnen, W.: History of problem-based learning in medical education. Oxford University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ginty, A.: Problem Based Learning. Higher Education Academy, Escalate (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andrews, S.: Aligning the Teaching of FCA with Existing Module Learning Outcomes. In: Andrews, S., Polovina, S., Hill, R., Akhgar, B. (eds.) ICCS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6828, pp. 394–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biggs, J.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andrews, S., Orphanides, C.: FcaBedrock, a Formal Context Creator. In: Croitoru, M., Ferré, S., Lukose, D. (eds.) ICCS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6208, pp. 181–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Andrews, S.: In-Close2, a High Performance Formal Concept Miner. In: Andrews, S., Polovina, S., Hill, R., Akhgar, B. (eds.) ICCS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6828, pp. 50–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ConExp, Concept Explorer (2006), http://sourceforge.net/projects/conexp/ (cited April 1, 2012)
  15. 15.
    Andrews, S., Orphanides, C., Polovina, S.: Visualising Computational Intelligence through Converting Data into Formal Concepts. In: Xhafa, F., Barolli, L., Nishino, H., Aleksy, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3GPCIC), pp. 302–307. IEEE Computer Society (2010) ISBN 978-0-7695-4237-9/10Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aronson, E.: Jigsaw Classroom: Overview of the Technique Social Psychology Network, (2012), http://www.jigsaw.org/overview.html (cited August 15, 2012)
  17. 17.
    SAP, BI on Demand powered by Hana SAP (2012), http://www.biondemand.com/businessintelligence (SAP viewed August 15, 2012)
  18. 18.
    Gartner, Gartner reveals five business intelligence predictions for 2009 and beyond (2009), http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=856714 (cited August 15, 2012)
  19. 19.
    Presthus, W.: Never giving up: Challenges and solutions when teaching Business Intelligence, The Norwegian School of IT (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Watmough
    • 1
  • Simon Polovina
    • 1
  • Simon Andrews
    • 1
  1. 1.Conceptual Structures Research Group, Communication and Computing Research Centre, Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineering and SciencesSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations