Prospects for Monetary Coordination in the Mediterranean Region: More or Larger Monetary Unions?

Chapter
Part of the Financial and Monetary Policy Studies book series (FMPS, volume 36)

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyze some convergence criteria in the geographic region extending from the EMU all the way to the GCC including most MENA countries with the objective to determine the possibility of coordination between the EMU and the promised gulf monetary union and between other countries in the MENA region that are operating independently of other countries and the GCC. The aim is to conclude whether the EMU and the GCC can coordinate policy and whether the region can have another viable monetary union such as the gulf one or a larger one by having some other MENA countries join the GCC monetary union. The analysis shows that the GCC countries have successfully met most if not practically all of the convergence criteria necessary for monetary integration. The paper reflects that coordination between the EMU and the GCC can take place at many levels except the exchange rate regime as the EMU follows an independent freely floating exchange rate with the GCC pegging to a different currency. The paper mostly addressed the possibility that other MENA countries coordinate individually with the GCC to join the union once established. The results of the model as well as casual empiricism show that a more efficient possibility exists for oil-producing MENA countries over non-oil producing ones based on performance concerning the convergence criteria and the initial position of each group and the GCC’s target variables.

Keywords

Financial integration Monetary union GCC and MENA countries 

References

  1. Abed, C., Nun Erbas, S., & Cuerami, B. (2003). The GCC Monetary Union.’ Some considerations for the exchange rate regime (IMF Working Paper No. 03/66). Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  2. Frankel, J. (1988, December). Obstacles to international macroeconomic policy coordination, Princeton Studies in International Finance, No. 64. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fratianni, M., Von Hagen, J., & Waller, C. (1992, June). The Maastricht way To EMU, Essays in International Finance, No. 187. Princeton: Princeton University Press, International Finance Section.Google Scholar
  4. Humpage, O. (1990). A hitchhiker’s guide to international macroeconomic policy coordination. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, 26(1), Quarter 1, 2–14.Google Scholar
  5. International Financial Statistics Monthly, International Monetary Fund, various issues.Google Scholar
  6. Khan, M. S. (2009, April). The GCC Monetary Union: Choice of Exchange Rate Regime (Working Paper Series). Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, Annual Reports and Statistical Publications, various issues.Google Scholar
  8. Shahin, W. (1996). International monetary coordination between Lebanon and the EMU: The convergence criteria. In W. Shahin & K. Shehadi (Eds.), Pathways to integration: Lebanon and the Euro-Mediterranean partnership (pp. 77–89). Beirut: The Lebanese Center for Policy Studies and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. World Economic Outlook Databasis, International Monetary Fund, various issues.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessLebanese American UniversityByblosLebanon
  2. 2.Association of Banks in LebanonBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations