Model Based Simulation and Evaluation of Mobile and Web 2.0 Applications for Users with Special Needs
The accessibility of modern Web 2.0 applications for people with disabilities continues to be a problem [1,2,3]. Recent research has shown that even the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 only cover half of the accessibility problems that users encounter when interacting with those kind of web applications .
Those guidelines do not consider the fact that people with disabilities use special interaction patterns when interacting with web applications . Analysing these interaction patterns and integrating them into the development process of web applications by providing tool support seems promising to help improving the accessibility of those web applications and also to reduce the time and costs for user trials [6,7].
The purpose of this thesis is to simulate interaction patterns of people with disabilities and to analyse how those interaction patterns have effects on the time and efficiency to complete given tasks in web applications. It will also analyse how effective this simulation will be in helping to design web applications, both accessible and usable.
To achieve this, a model based simulation framework will be designed that take into account different models involved in the interaction of users with web applications. A software tool will be developed that implements these models and the simulation.
KeywordsWeb Accessibility Web Usability User Interactions Web Simulation Interaction Patterns Model Based Simulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Pappas, L., Schwerdtfeger, R., Cooper, M.: WAI-ARIA 1.0 Primer - An introduction to rich Internet application accessibility challenges and solutions, W3C Working Draft 16 September 2010. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2010)Google Scholar
- 4.Power, C., Freire, A., Petrie, H., Swallow, D.: Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the web. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, pp. 433–442. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Petrie, H., Power, C., Swallow, D.: I2web deliverable 3.1: User requirements analysis in ubiquitous web 2.0 applications (2011)Google Scholar
- 7.Trewin, S., John, B.E., Richards, J., Swart, C., Brezin, J., Bellamy, R., Thomas, J.: Towards a tool for keystroke level modeling of skilled screen reading. In: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2010, pp. 27–34. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Allaire, J.: Macromedia flash mx-a next-generation rich client. Technical report, Macromedia (2002)Google Scholar
- 9.Duhl, J.: White paper: Rich internet applications. Technical report, IDC (Sponsored by Macromedia and Intel) (2003)Google Scholar
- 13.Wentz, B., Lazar, J.: Usability evaluation of email applications by blind users. J. Usability Studies 6(2), 8:75–8:89 (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Trewin, S., Richards, J., Bellamy, R., John, B.E., Thomas, J., Swart, C., Brezin, J.: Toward modeling auditory information seeking strategies on the web. In: Proceedings of the 28th of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2010, pp. 3973–3978. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ackermann, P., Velasco, C.A., Power, C.: Developing a semantic user and device modeling framework that supports ui adaptability of web 2.0 applications for people with special needs. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, W4A 2012, pp. 12:1–12:4. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Le Hors, A., Le Hégaret, P., Wood, L., Nicol, G., Robie, J., Champion, M., Byrne, S.: Document Object Model (DOM) Level 3 Core Specification. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2004)Google Scholar
- 19.Biswas, P.: Inclusive User Modeling - A simulator to design Accessible User Interfaces. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory (2010)Google Scholar
- 21.Bellamy, R., Kogan, S., Street, R.: Deploying CogTool: Integrating Quantitative Usability Assessment into Real-World Software Development. In: Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 691–700 (2011)Google Scholar
- 22.Engelbrecht, K.P., Kruppa, M., Möller, S., Quade, M.: Memo workbench for semi-automated usability testing. In: INTERSPEECH 2008, pp. 1662–1665 (2008)Google Scholar
- 23.Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., Maeda, J.: Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. (77-78), 177–184 (2003)Google Scholar
- 24.Hickson, I.: HTML5 - A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML, W3C Working Draft 25 May 2011. Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium, W3C (2011)Google Scholar