Advertisement

The Glaucomas pp 785-878 | Cite as

Glaucoma Surgery

  • Roberto Sampaolesi
  • Juan Roberto Sampaolesi
  • Jorge Zárate
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of surgery is to eliminate internal resistance to aqueous humor outflow. Resistance to aqueous humor outflow is internal and external (see Fig.  14.2).

Keywords

Anterior Chamber Aqueous Humor Trabecular Meshwork Glaucoma Surgery Choroidal Detachment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Supplementary material

(MPG 145501 kb)

(MPG 70129 kb)

(MPG 70329 kb)

(MPG 23421 kb)

(WMV 101891 kb)

(AVI 15828 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Goldmann H (1946) Drainage of aqueous in man. (Ophthalmologica, 11 p 146) A further note on the drainage of the aqueous humor in man. (Ophthalmologica 1946, 112, p344; 1948, 116, p195; 1949, 117, p240)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perkins ES (1955) Pressure in the canal of Schlemm. Br J Ophthalmol 39:215–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sears ML (1966) Pressure in the canal of Schlemm and its relation to tensite of resistance to outflow of aqueous humour in the eyes of ethiopian green monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol 5:610–623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grant WM, Troiter RR (1955) Tonographic measurements in enucleated eyes. Arch Ophthalmol Chicago 53:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grant WM (1958) Further studies on facility of flow through the trabecular meshwork. Arch Ophthalmol Chicago 60:523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barany EH, Scotchbrook S (1953) Influence of testicular Hyaluronidase on the resistance of flow through the angle of ten anterior chambers. Acta Phys Scand 30:240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zimmermann L (1967) Histology and pathology of the outflow channels. Symposium on glaucoma. The C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brini A (1957) Le resau trabeculaire de la chambre anterieure. Ann Oculist 190:755–776Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peterson WS, Jocson VL, Sears ML (1971) Resistance to aqueous outflow in the rhesus monkey eye. Am J Ophthalmol 72:445–451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seiler T, Kriegerowski M, Bende T, Wollensak J (1988) Partial trabeculectomy with the Excimer laser (193 nm). ARVO annual meeting abstract issue. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29(ARVO Suppl):239Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Béchetoille A, Brachet A, Saraux H (1976) Micro-Chirurgie des Glaucomes. Bulletin des Societes Dóphtalmologie de France. Rapport Annuel. Numéro SpécialGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alvarado JA, Weinreb RN (1987) Incisional glaucoma surgery. Department of Ophthalmology, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harms H, Dannheim R (1988) Glaukomoperationen bei offenem Kammerwinkel: Teil I and Teil II. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/London/Paris/TokyoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Von Graffe A (1857) Uber die iridectomie bie glaucom und uber i nem Kammerwinkel (Springer, Verlag/Berlin, Heidelberg), den glaucomatosed process. Arch Ophthalmol 3:456Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lagrange F (1906) lridectomie et sclerectomie combinees dans le / traitement du glaucome chronique. Procede nouveau pour l’etablissement de la cicatrice filtrante. Arch d’Ophth 26:481Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holth S (1907) Iridencleisis anti glaucoma. An Oculistique 37:345–350Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elliot RH (1909) A preliminary note on a new operative procedure for the establishment of a filtering cicatrix in the treatment of glaucoma. Ophthalmoscope 7:804Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Preziosi CL (1924) The electro-cautery in the treatment of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 8:414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scheie HG (1958) Retraction of scleral wound edges as a fistulizing procedure for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 45:220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heine L (1905) Die Cyklodialyse, eine neue Glaucom-operation. Deutsche Med Wehnscher 31:825Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weve H (1933) Die Zyklodiatermie das Corpus ciliare bei Glaukom. Zentralb Ophthalmol 29:562Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weekers L (1949) Mode d’.action des opérations antiglaucomateuses. Ophthalmologica 118:564–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Vincentiis Y (1893) Incisione dell’angolo irideo nel glaucoma. Ann Oftal 22:540Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barkan O (1936) New operation for chronic glaucoma: restoration of physiological function by opening Schlemm’s canal under direct magnified vision. Am J Ophthalmol 19:951–966Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burian HM (1960) A case of Marfan’s syndrome with bilateral y, glaucoma. With description of a new type of operation for developmental glaucoma (trabeculotomy ab externo). Am J Ophtha! 50:1187Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dellaporta A (1959) Anterior trabeculodialysis. Am J Ophthalmol 48:15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dellaporta A (1959) Evaluation of anterior and posterior trabeculodialysis. Am J Ophthalmol 48:294–309Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harms H, Mackensen G (1967) Ocular surgery under the microscope. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, p 291Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harms H, Dannheim R (1968) Trabeculotomy, results and problems. Symposium microsurgery of the eye, Burgenstock, 1968Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harms H, Dannheim R (1970) Trabeculotomy. Results and problems. In: Mackensen C. Microsurgery in glaucoma. Adv Ophthalmol 22:121–131Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paufique L, Sourdille P, Ortiz-Olmedo AH (1971) Technique et resultats de la trabéculotomie ab externo dans le traitements du glaucome congénital. Bull Mém Soc Franc Ophthalmol 82:54–65Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Krasnov MM (1964) Sinusotomie dans le glaucome (en russe). Vest Oftalmol 77Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krasnov MM (1966) Operations on Schlemm’s canal as surgical treatment of glaucoma. Proceed. Inter. Congo Ophthalmol, Munich. Excerpta Medica Foundation edit, p 548–549Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krasnov MM (1968) Technique de la sinusotomie et ses varietes (en ruse). Vestn Oftal 3:3–9Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cairns JE (1968) Trabeculectomy: preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 66(4):673–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cairns JE (1972) Surgical treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK XCH:745–756Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cairns JE (1972) Trabeculectomy: symposium of microsurgery of the outflow channels. Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 76(2):384–388Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leonardi E (1948) Chirugia dell’apparato oculare, vol 1. Arte della Stampa, Roma, pp 137–252Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Eisner G (1978) Augenchirugie. Einführung in die operative Technik. Springer, Berlín/Heidelberg/New York, pp 139–152Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eisner G (1984) Cirugía del ojo. Introducción a la técnica operatoria. Editorial Médica Panamericana, Buenos Aires, pp 165–178Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Castelli A (1965) Tecnica di “Fistolizzazione Pro­fonda” Antiglaucomatosa ATTI Soc. Oftalmologica Lombarda 21–28Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Barkan O (1938) Microsurgery in chronic simple glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 21:403–405Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vasco-Posadas J (1967) Glaucoma: esclerectomia subscleral. Arch Soc Am Oftal Optom 6:235Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fronimoupoulos J, Christakis C (1975) Gonio­trepanation (Gotrep) and further observations on this operation for chronic glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 193:135–145Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Watson PG, Barnett F (1975) Effectiveness of trabeculectomy in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 79:831–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nesterov AP, Fedorova NV, Batmanov YE (1972) Sinus trabeculectomy, preliminary results of 100 operations. Br J Ophthalmol 56:833–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krasnov MM (1974) A modified trabeculectomy. Ann Ophthalmol 6:178–182Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Khalili A, Diestelhorst M, Krieglstein GK (2000) Langzeituntersuchung von 700 Trabekulektomien. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 217:1–8 (Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salleras, personal communication (1960)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chandler PA (1951) Malignant glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 34:998Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chandler PA, Maumenee AE (1961) A Mayor cause ofhypotony. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngnol 65:564Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chandler PA, Grant WM (1962) Mydriatic cycloplegic treatment in malignant glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol Chicago 68:353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chandler PA (1964) A new operation for malignant glaucoma. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngnol 62:408–419Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chandler PA, Grant WM (1965) Lectures on glaucoma. Lea and Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chandler PA (1967) Difficulties and complications of glaucoma surgery. Glaucoma symposium, Tutzing Castje, 1966, pp 215–221. Karger, Basel/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Krasnow MM (1966) Glaucoma surgery in the region outer and inner wall of Schlemm canal. In: Proceeding of III congress of ophthalmology of the USSR, vol 1, Volgograd, 1966, Meditsina, pp 200–210Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Krasnov MM (1968) Externalization of Schlemm’s canal (sinusotomy) in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 52:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Alekseev BN (1978) Microsurgery of the internal wall of Schlemm’s canal. Vestn Oftal 4:4–14Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fyodorov SN et al (1984) Deep sclerectomy: technique and mechanism of a new glaucomatous procedure. Glaucoma 6:281–283Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fyodorov SN (1989) Non-penetrating sclerectomy in open-angle glaucoma. IRTC Eye Microsurgery. RSFSR Ministry of Public Health, Moscow, pp 52–55Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zimmerman TJ et al (1984) Trabeculectomy vs. non penetrating trabeculectomy. A retrospective study of two procedures in phakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 15:734–740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Koslov VI (1990) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen. IRTC Eye Microsurgery. RSFSR Ministry of Public Health, Moscow, pp 62–66Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kozlov Vin, Kozlova TV (1996) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen drainage implantation (ABSTRACT 9–02). In: 5th congress and the glaucoma course of the European Glaucoma Society, June 1996, Paris. Abstract book: 120Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kozlova TV et al (1996) Analysis of complications of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with collagen implant (ABSTRACT 9–02.1). In: 5th congress and the glaucoma course of the European Glaucoma Society, June 1996, Paris. Abstract book: 120Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kozlova T (2000) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy: evolution of the method and prospects for development (review). Ophthalmol Surg 3:39–53Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Arenas Archillas E (1991) Trabeculectomy ab externo. Highlights Ophthalmol Lett XIX:9Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Stegman R et al (1999) Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sourdille PH et al (1999) Chirurgie non perforante du trabeculum avec implant d’acide hyaluronique réticulé. Pourquoi, comment, quels résultats? J Fr Ophtalmol 22:794–797PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Demailly P, Jeanteur-Lunel MN, Berkani M et al (1996) Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy associated with collagen device in primary open angle glaucoma: Middle-term retrospective study. J Fr Ophtalmol 19:659–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mermoud A, Shaarawy T (eds) (2001) Non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. Martin Dunitz Ud, LondonGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sampaolesi R, Brusini P, Sampaolesi J (2003) Korrelation zwischen der konfokalen Tomographie des Nervus opticus (HRT) und der perimetrischen Frequenzverdopelungstechnik (FDT). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 220:754–766, © Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart: New York. ISSN 0023–2165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mermoud A (2000) Nd:Yag goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy with collagen implant. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 30(2):120–125Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Molteno ACB, Fucik M, Dempster AG, Bevin TH (2003) Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study. Factors controlling capsule fibrosis around Molteno implants with histopathological correlation. Ophthalmology 110:2196–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Molteno ACB (1969) New implant for drainage in glaucoma. Clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 53:606–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Molteno ACB, Dempster AG (1988) Methods of controlling bleb fibrosis around draining implants. In: Mills KB (ed) Fourth international symposium of the Northern Eye Institute. Pergamon Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Molteno ACB, van Biljon G, Ancker E (1979) Two-stage insertion of glaucoma drainage implants. Trans Ophthalmol Soc N Z 31:1726Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Molteno ACB, Polkinghorne PJ, Bowbyes JA (1986) The vicryl tie technique for inserting a draining implant in the treatment of secondary glaucoma. Aust NZJ Ophthalmol 14:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Molteno ACB, Ancker E, Van Biljon G (1984) Surgical technique for advanced juvenile glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 102:51–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Molteno ACB, Whittaker KW, Bevin TH, Herbison P (2004) Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study. Long-term results of cataract extraction combined with Molteno implant insertion or trabeculectomy in primary glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 88:32–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Molteno ACB, Sayawat N, Herbison P (2001) Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study. Long-term results of uveitis with secondary glaucoma drained by Molteno implants. Ophthalmology 108:605–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Molteno ACB, Bevin TH, Herbison P, Houliston MJ (2001) Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study. Long-term follow-up of cases of primary glaucoma with additional risk factors drained by Molteno implants. Ophthalmology 108:2193–2200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Molteno ACB (1990) The dual chamber single plate implant-its use in neovascular glaucoma. Aust NZJ Ophthmol 18:431–436Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Molteno ACB, Haddad PJ (1985) The visual outcome in cases of neovascular glaucoma. Aust NZJ Ophthalmol 13:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Brooks SE et al (1994) Modifications of the glaucoma drainage implant to prevent early postoperative hypertension and hypotony: a laboratory study. Ophthalmic Surg 25:311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Coleman DI, Trokel S (1969) Direct-recorded intraocular pressure variations in a human subject. Arch Ophthalmol 82:637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Krupin Eye Valve Filtering Surgery Study Group (1994) Krupin eye valve with disk for filtration surgery. Ophthalmology 101:651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Krupin T, Lloyd MA (1993) Intermediate-term results of a randomized clinical trial of the 350- mm2 vs the 500- mm2 Baerveldt implant. Ophthalmology 101:1463Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Krupin T (1988) Setons in glaucoma surgery. In: Waltman SR et al (eds) Surgery of the eye. Churchill Livingstone, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Krupin T, Rosenberg LF, Ruderman JM (1994) Drainage implants. In: Kaufman PL, Mittag TW (eds) Glaucoma. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Krupin T et al (1988) A long Krupin-Denver valve implant attached to a 180-degree scleral explant for glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmology 95:1174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Krupin T et al (1983) Long-term results of valve implants in filtering surgery for eyes with neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 95:775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Krupin T et al (1976) Valve implants in filtering surgery: a preliminary report. Am J Ophthalmol 81:232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Mermoud A et al (1993) Molteno tube implantation for neovascular glaucoma: long-term results and ­factors influencing outcome. Ophthalmology 100:897Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Castelli A (1965) Tecnica di “fistolizzante profonda” antiglaucomatosa (fistolizzazione sotto lembo sclerocorneale, con iridectomia periferica o totale, con, o senza, iridenclesis a grembiule). Atti Soc Oftalmol Lombarda 21–28Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Cairns JE (1976) Goniospasis: a method designed to relieve canalicular blockade in open-angle glaucoma. Ann Ophthalmol 8:1417–1422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zimmerman TJ, Kooner KS, Ford VJ, Olander KW, Mandlekorn RM, Rawlings EF (1984) Trabe­culectomy vs. nonpenetrating trabeculectomy a retrospective study of two procedures in phakic patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 15:734–740Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Fyodorov SN, Ioffe DI, Ronkina TI (1984) Deep sclerectomy: technique and mechanism of a new antiglaucomatous procedure. Glaucoma 6:281–283Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Stegmann RC (1995) Visco-canalostomy: a new surgical technique for open angle glaucoma. Annals de Istituto Barraquer 25:229–232Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sourdille P, Santiago P-Y, Villain F et al (1999) Reticulated hyaluronic acid implant in nonperforating trabecular surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:332–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ambresin A, Sharawey T, Mermoud A (2002) Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patients. J Glaucoma 11:214–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Carassa RG, Bettin P, Fiori M, Brancato R (2003) Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma; a 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology 110:882–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Van Buskirk M (2004) Dreams of canalostomies. Arch Ophthalmol 122:1868–1869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Minckler DS, Hill RA (2009) Use of novel devices for control of intraocular pressure. Exp Eye Res 88:792–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Koerber N (2007) Canaloplasty. A new approach to nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery. Tech Ophthalmol 5:102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M et al (2007) Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults. Interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1217–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Shingleton B, Tetz M, Korber N (2008) Circum­ferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal (canaloplasty) with temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:433–440Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Peckar CO, Koerber N (2008) Canaloplasty for open angle glaucoma: a three years critical evaluation and comparison with canaloplasty. Spectrum Augenheilkd 22/4:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Lewis RA, von Wolff K, Tetz M et al (2009) Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults. Two-year interim clinical study analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:814–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Godfrey DG, Fellman RL, Neelakantan A (2009) Canal surgery in adult glaucomas. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:116–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Grieshaber MC, Fraenkl S, Schoetzau A, Flammer J, Orgül S (2010) Circumferential viscocanalostomy and suture canal distension (canaloplasty) for whites with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 20:298–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2010) Clinical evaluation of the aqueous outflow system in primary open-angle glaucoma for canaloplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:1498–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2010) Canaloplasty for open-angle glaucoma: long term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1478–1482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Koerber NJ (2011) Canaloplasty in one eye compared with viscocanalostomy in the contralateral eye in patients with bilateral open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 21(2):129–134Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    von Wolff K, Tetz M, Koerber N, Kearney JR, Shingleton BJ, Samuelson TW (2011) Canaloplasty: three-year results of circumferential viscodi­lation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a ­microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refrac Surg 37:682–690Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2010) Comparing two tensioning suture sizes for 360 degrees viscocanalostomy (canaloplasty): a randomised controlled trial. Eye 24:1220–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Gismondi M, Brusini P (2011) Intracorneal hematoma after canaloplasty in glaucoma. Cornea 30:718–719PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R (2009) Channelography: imaging of the aqueous outflow pathway with flexible microcatheter and fluorescein in canaloplasty. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 226:245–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kagemann L, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H et al (2010) Identification and assessment of Schlemm’s canal by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:4054–4059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Sampaolesi R (1968) Iridencleisis and cyclodialysis surgical method complication and results. Mod Probl Ophthalmol 6:148–170 (Karger, Basel/New York)Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Naumann GOH, Holbach LM, Kruse FE (2008) Applied pathology for ophthalmic microsurgeons. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Sampaolesi
    • 1
  • Juan Roberto Sampaolesi
    • 2
  • Jorge Zárate
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologyUCESBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Department of PathologyUniversity of Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations