Epilogue: Conflict in the Twenty First Century

  • Robin R. Vallacher
  • Peter T. Coleman
  • Andrzej Nowak
  • Lan Bui-Wrzosinska
  • Larry Liebovitch
  • Katharina G. Kugler
  • Andrea Bartoli
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)


Conflict is a defining feature of human relations. It would be naïve, if not irresponsible, to think that antagonistic interactions among individuals, groups, and nations can ever be eliminated or marginalized, no matter how much we learn about the root causes of such interactions. A realistic goal is to understand the fundamental dynamics that promote and sustain destructive conflict generally, and the special blend of dynamical properties that transform a small proportion of conflicts into a protracted state of hostile relations that destroys the fabric of interpersonal, intergroup, and international life. The book thus far has identified key dynamical principles underlying the progression toward intractable conflict, with an emphasis on conflicts observed throughout history and that are all too prevalent today. This understanding, in turn, provides the basis for divining means of disrupting the feedback loops that sustain protracted conflicts, so that such conflicts can be transformed into benign or even positive social relations.


Hate Crime Optimistic Scenario Executive Resource Violent Confrontation Destructive Conflict 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (2005). Remaking the American mainstream: Assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabasi, A. (2001). Linked. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry, J. S. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46, 5–34.Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 554–594). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, P. T. (2000). Fostering ripeness in seemingly intractable conflict: An experimental study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dabs, J. M., Jr., & Morris, R. (1990). Testosterone, social class, and antisocial behavior in a sample of 4462 men. Psychological Science, 1, 209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York, NY: Aldine deGruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1994). Evolutionary psychology of male violence. In J. Archer (Ed.), Male violence (pp. 253–288). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, L. (1986). Evidence of neuroandrogenic etiology of sex roles form a combined analysis of human, non-human primate and nonprimate mammalian studies. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 519–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., et al. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. International Security, 18, 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Latane’, B., & Nowak, A. (1994). Attitudes as catastrophes: from dimensions to categories with increasing involvement. In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 219–249). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men [target article and commentaries]. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Monaghan, E., & Glickman, S. (1992). Hormones and aggressiveness behavior. In J. Becker, S. Breedlove, & D. Crews (Eds.), Behavioral endocrinology (pp. 261–285). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  25. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Pruitt, D. G. (1997). Ripeness theory and the Oslo talks. International Negotiation, 2(2), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruelle, D. (1989). Elements of differentiable dynamics and bifurcation theory. New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  29. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, J., Hood, W., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robber’s cave experiment. Norman: Institute of Intergroup Relations, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  30. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrzosinska, L. (2010). Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems. American Psychologist, 65, 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Action identification theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 327–348). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Varshnay, W. (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., & Ciarocco, N. (2005). Self-regulation and self-presentation: Regulatory resource depletion impairs impression management and effortful self-presentation depletes regulatory resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 632–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Self-regulatory failure: A resource-depletion approach. Psychological Science, 11, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zartman, I. W. (2000). Ripeness: The hurting stalemate and beyond. In P. C. Stern & D. Druckman (Eds.), International conflict resolution after the Cold War (pp. 225–250). Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin R. Vallacher
    • 1
  • Peter T. Coleman
    • 2
  • Andrzej Nowak
    • 3
  • Lan Bui-Wrzosinska
    • 4
  • Larry Liebovitch
    • 5
  • Katharina G. Kugler
    • 6
  • Andrea Bartoli
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  2. 2.International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  4. 4.International Center for Complexity and ConflictWarsaw School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  5. 5.Division of Mathematics and Natural SciencesCity University of New York Queens CollegeNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Economic and Organisational PsychologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet MuenchenMunichGermany
  7. 7.School for Conflict Analysis and ResolutionGeorge Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations