Aggregative Data Infrastructures for the Cultural Heritage

  • Alessia Bardi
  • Paolo Manghi
  • Franco Zoppi
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 343)

Abstract

Aggregative data infrastructures (ADIs) are information systems where organizations can find the tools to integrate their data sources to form uniform and richer information spaces of object metadata descriptions. Novel sustainable approaches for the realization of ADIs are based on the adoption of ADI enabling technologies which support the realization, maintenance and upgrade of ADIs and promote functionality re-use. The Cultural Heritage (CH) community is one of the most active in the realization of ADIs. Besides, the realization of ADIs for CH can be particularly complex when compared to other disciplines due to the possibly high heterogeneity of data sources involved. In this paper, we present the D-NET Software Toolkit as an ideal candidate for the realization of sustainable, extensible, scalable and dynamic ADIs for CH. To this aim we present the D-NET framework and services, and demonstrate its effectiveness in the CH scenario by describing its adoption to realize a real-case ADI for the project Heritage of the People’s Europe.

Keywords

Cultural Heritage Metadata Aggregation Interoperability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Manghi, P., Mikulicic, M., Candela, L., Artini, M., Bardi, A.: General-Purpose Digital Library Content Laboratory Systems. In: Lalmas, M., Jose, J., Rauber, A., Sebastiani, F., Frommholz, I. (eds.) ECDL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6273, pp. 14–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Manghi, P., Mikulicic, M., Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P.: Realizing and maintaining aggregative digital library systems: D-net software toolkit and oaister system. D-Lib Magazine 16(3/4) (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blanke, T.: From tools and services to e-infrastructure for the arts and humanities. In: Lin, S.C., Yen, E. (eds.) Production Grids in Asia, pp. 117–127. Springer US (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loebbecke, C., Thaller, M.: Digitization as an it response to the preservation of europe’s cultural heritage. In: Carugati, A., Rossignoli, C. (eds.) Emerging Themes in Information Systems and Organization Studies, pp. 359–372. Physica-Verlag HD (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cramer, T., Kott, K.: Designing and implementing second generation digital preservation services: A scalable model for the stanford digital repository. D-Lib Magazine 16(9/10) (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, Y., Banach, M.: Institutional repositories and digital preservation: Assessing current practices at research libraries. D-Lib Magazine 17(5/6) (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amato, G., Debole, F., Peters, C., Savino, P.: Multimatch: Multilingual/multimedia access to cultural heritage. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Thanos, C. (eds.) IRCDL, DELOS: an Association for Digital Libraries / Department of Information Engineering of the University of Padua, pp. 162–165 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blanke, T., Hedges, M.: Providing linked-up access to cultural heritage data. In: Proceedings of the ECDL 2008 Workshop on Information Access to Cultural Heritage, Aarhus, Denmark (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Váradi, T., Krauwer, S., Wittenburg, P., Wynne, M., Koskenniemi, K.: Clarin: Common language resources and technology infrastructure. In: Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odjik, J., Piperidis, S., Tapias, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08), Marrakech, Morocco. European Language Resources Association, ELRA (2008), http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2008/
  10. 10.
    Simeoni, F., Candela, L., Lievens, D., Pagano, P., Simi, M.: Functional Adaptivity for Digital Library Services in e-Infrastructures: The gCube Approach. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 51–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calanducci, A., Sevilla, J., Barbera, R., Andronico, G., Saso, M., De Filippo, A., Iannizzotto, S., Vicinanza, D., De Mattia, F.: Cultural Heritage Digital Libraries on Data Grids. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 469–472. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reis, D., Freire, N., Manguinhas, H., Pedrosa, G.: REPOX – A Framework for Metadata Interchange. In: Agosti, M., Borbinha, J., Kapidakis, S., Papatheodorou, C., Tsakonas, G. (eds.) ECDL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5714, pp. 479–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manghi, P., Mikulicic, M.: PACE: A General-Purpose Tool for Authority Control. In: García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds.) MTSR 2011. CCIS, vol. 240, pp. 80–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haslhofer, B., Klas, W.: A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability. ACM Comput. Surv. 42, 7:1–7:37 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessia Bardi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paolo Manghi
    • 1
  • Franco Zoppi
    • 1
  1. 1.Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheIstituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione “A. Faedo”Italy
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’InformazioneUniversità di PisaItaly

Personalised recommendations