On Local Separation of Processing and Storage in Infrastructure-as-a-Service

  • Jörn Künsemöller
  • Holger Karl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7714)

Abstract

When processing and storage are obtained as internet services, the actual location of the providing facility is undetermined. Factors like a robust and cheap power supply, cooling-relevant climate conditions as well as legal and risk-related considerations are important for selecting a facility’s site. As storage and processing facilities feature different economies of scale and location, their local separation is an alternative to combining them in one location. This paper contributes a game-theoretic model to investigate the market success of separate processing and storage facilities compared to a combined approach. It can be shown that stable market constellations with separate service specific facilities are possible.

Keywords

Cloud Computing Markets Game Theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dube, P., Jain, R., Touati, C.: An Analysis of Pricing Competition for Queued Services with Multiple Providers. In: ITA Workshop (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pal, R., Hui, P.: Economic Models for Cloud Service Markets. In: Bononi, L., Datta, A.K., Devismes, S., Misra, A. (eds.) ICDCN 2012. LNCS, vol. 7129, pp. 382–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alger, D.: Choosing an Optimal Location for Your Data Center. In: Build the Best Data Center Facility for Your Business. Cisco Press (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Galbraith, K.: Using the Weather to Cool Data Centers, http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/using-the-weather-to-cool-data-centers/
  5. 5.
    Hustinx, P.: Data Protection and Cloud Computing under EU law. In: Third European Cyber Security Awareness Day BSA, European Parliament (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gellman, R.: Privacy in the Clouds: Risks to Privacy and Confidentiality from Cloud Computing. In: World Privacy Forum (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaufman, L.M.: Data Security in the World of Cloud Computing. IEEE Security & Privacy 7, 61–64 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pearson, S.: Taking Account of Privacy when Designing Cloud Computing Services. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges of Cloud Computing, CLOUD 2009, pp. 44–52. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shafer, J.: I/O Virtualization Bottlenecks in Cloud Computing Today. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on I/O Virtualization, WIOV 2010, p. 5 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baun, C.: Untersuchung und Entwicklung von Cloud Computing-Diensten als Grundlage zur Schaffung eines Marktplatzes. Dissertation, Hamburg (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, J.M., Price, G.R.: The Logic of Animal Conflict. Nature 246(5427), 15–18 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taylor, P.D., Jonker, L.B.: Evolutionary Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences 40, 145–156 (1978)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Künsemöller, J., Karl, H.: A Game-Theoretical Approach to the Benefits of Cloud Computing. In: Vanmechelen, K., Altmann, J., Rana, O.F. (eds.) GECON 2011. LNCS, vol. 7150, pp. 148–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hamilton, J.: Cloud Computing Economies of Scale, MIX 2010 talk (2010), viewable at http://channel9.msdn.com/events/MIX/MIX10/EX01/
  15. 15.
    HostedFTP.com: Amazon S3 and EC2 Performance Report How fast is S3?, http://hostedftp.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/
  16. 16.
    Amazon Web Services Blog: Amazon S3 - The First Trillion Objects, http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2012/06/amazon-s3-the-first-trillion-objects.html
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörn Künsemöller
    • 1
  • Holger Karl
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Program AutomatismsUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Computer Networks Group, EIM-IUniversity of PaderbornPaderbornGermany

Personalised recommendations