Decision Procedures over Sophisticated Fractional Permissions

  • Xuan Bach Le
  • Cristian Gherghina
  • Aquinas Hobor
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7705)

Abstract

Fractional permissions enable sophisticated management of resource accesses in both sequential and concurrent programs. Entailment checkers for formulae that contain fractional permissions must be able to reason about said permissions to verify the entailments. We show how entailment checkers for separation logic with fractional permissions can extract equation systems over fractional shares. We develop a set decision procedures over equations drawn from the sophisticated boolean binary tree fractional permission model developed by Dockins et al.[4]. We prove that our procedures are sound and complete and discuss their computational complexity. We explain our implementation and provide benchmarks to help understand its performance in practice. We detail how our implementation has been integrated into the HIP/SLEEK verification toolset. We have machine-checked proofs in Coq.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bornat, R., Calcagno, C., O’Hearn, P., Parkinson, M.: Permission accounting in separation logic. In: POPL, pp. 259–270 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyland, J.: Checking Interference with Fractional Permissions. In: Cousot, R. (ed.) SAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2694, pp. 55–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Moura, L., Bjørner, N.: Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dockins, R., Hobor, A., Appel, A.W.: A Fresh Look at Separation Algebras and Share Accounting. In: Hu, Z. (ed.) APLAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5904, pp. 161–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An Extensible SAT-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 502–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heule, S., Leino, K.R.M., Müller, P., Summers, A.J.: Fractional permissions without the fractions. In: FTfJP (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hobor, A.: Oracle Semantics. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Department of Computer Science, Princeton, NJ (October 2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hobor, A., Gherghina, C.: Barriers in Concurrent Separation Logic. In: Barthe, G. (ed.) ESOP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6602, pp. 276–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hobor, A., Gherghina, C.: Barriers in concurrent separation logic: Now with tool support! Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(2) (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacobs, B., Smans, J., Philippaerts, P., Vogels, F., Penninckx, W., Piessens, F.: VeriFast: A Powerful, Sound, Predictable, Fast Verifier for C and Java. In: Bobaru, M., Havelund, K., Holzmann, G.J., Joshi, R. (eds.) NFM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6617, pp. 41–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen, H.H., David, C., Qin, S., Chin, W.N.: Automated Verification of Shape and Size Properties Via Separation Logic. In: Cook, B., Podelski, A. (eds.) VMCAI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4349, pp. 251–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parkinson, M.: Local Reasoning for Java. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reynolds, J.C.: Separation logic: A logic for shared mutable data structures. In: LICS, pp. 55–74 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Villard, J.: Personal communication (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villard, J., Lozes, É., Calcagno, C.: Tracking Heaps That Hop with Heap-Hop. In: Esparza, J., Majumdar, R. (eds.) TACAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6015, pp. 275–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuan Bach Le
    • 1
  • Cristian Gherghina
    • 1
  • Aquinas Hobor
    • 1
  1. 1.National University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations