Advertisement

Nudging Methods: A Critical Overview

  • S. Lakshmivarahan
  • John M. Lewis
Chapter

Abstract

A review of the various methods used to implement the “nudging” form of data assimilation has been presented with the intension of identifying both the pragmatic and theoretical aspects of the methodology. Its appeal rests on the intuitive belief that forecast corrections can be made on the basis of feedback control where forecast error from earlier times is incorporated into the dynamics. Further, the methodology is easy to implement. However, its early-period implementation with a nudging coefficient based on pure empiricism with slight consideration of the time scales of motion lacked a firm theoretical foundation. This empirical approach is reviewed but then placed in the context of advances that have attempted to optimally choose the nudging coefficient based on a functional that fits model to data as well as fitting the coefficient to an a priori estimate of the coefficient. Original research in this review makes it clear that these “optimal” methods have unintentionally neglected the inherent presence of serially correlated error in the nudged model. And in the absence of account for this error, the results are non-optimal. Finally, the theories of observer-based nudging and forward-backward nudging are presented as promising avenues of research for the nudging process of dynamic data assimilation.

Keywords

Kalman Filter Data Assimilation Forecast Error Numerical Weather Prediction Covariance Matrix Versus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our thanks are due to an anonymous reviewer for his detailed comments that improved the quality and the readability of this chapter. We wish to thank Mr. Dung Phan for his timely help in typesetting this chapter. S. Lakshmivarahan’s efforts are supported in part by NSF EPSCOR RII Track 2 Grant 105-155900 and by NSF Grant 105-15400.

References

  1. Anthes RA (1974) Data assimilation and initialization of hurricane prediction model. J Atmos Sci 31:702–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auroux D (2009) The back and forth nudging algorithm applied to a shallow water model: comparison and hybridization with the 4D-VAR. Int J Num Meth In Fluids 61:911–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auroux D (2011) Back and forth nudging methods in geophysical data assimilation. In: Lecture notes, monsoon workshop on mathematical and statistical foundations of data assimilation, TIFR, Bangalore, 04–23 July 2011Google Scholar
  4. Auroux D, Blum J (2005) Back and forth nudging algorithm for data assimilation problems. C R Acad Sci, Paris, Series I 340:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Auroux D,Blum J (2008) A nudging based data assimilation method: the back and forth nudging (BFN) algorithm. Nonlinear Process Geophys 15:305–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Auroux D, Nodet M (2010) The back and forth nudging algorithm for data assimilation problems: theoretical results on transport equations. Control Optimsation Calculus Var 18:1–25Google Scholar
  7. Bao J-W, Errico RM (1997) An adjoint examination of a nudging method for data assimilation. Mon Weather Rev 125:1355–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell RS, Dickinson A (1987) The Meteorological Office operational numerical weather prediction system. Meteorological Office, Scientific paper, Vol 41. H.M.S.O, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett S (1996) A brief history of automatic control. IEEE Contr Syst Mag 16: 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein D (2009) Matrix mathematics theory, facts and formulas, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1139 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Bjerknes V (1904) Das Problem der Wettervorhersage, betrachet vom Stanpunkt der Machanik und der Physik. Meteor Zeits 21:1–7Google Scholar
  12. Bonnabel S, Martin P, Rouchon P (2009) Nonlinear symmetry preserving observers on lie groups. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 54:1709–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brill KF, Uccellini LW, Manobianco J, Kocin PJ, Horman JH (1991) The use of successive dynamic initialization to simulate cyclogenesis during GALE IOP1. Meteorol Atmos Phys 45:15–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryson AE (1996) Optimal control—1950 to 1985. IEEE Contr Syst 16:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charney J, Fjortoft R, von Neumann J (1950) Numerical Integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus 2:237–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daley R (1991) Atmospheric data analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 457 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Derber J, Rosati A (1989) A global oceanic data assimilation system. J Phys Oceanogr 19:1333–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Derber J, Leetma A, Ji M, Shinn R (1990) Oceanic data assimilation at the National Meteorological Center.In: WMO international symposium on assimilation of observations in meteorology and oceanography, Clermont-Ferrand, France, 59–61Google Scholar
  19. Evensen G (2007) Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman filter.Springer, Berlin, 279 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis.Princeton University Press, Princeton, 799 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoke JE (1976) Initialization of models for numerical weather prediction by dynamic- initialization technique. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 202 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoke JE, Anthes RA (1976) The initialization of numerical models by a dynamic initialization technique. Mon Weather Rev 104:1551–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isidori K (1995) Nonlinear control systems, 3rd edn.Springer, New York, 549Google Scholar
  24. Kalman RE (1960a) On the general theory of control systems. In: Proceedings of the first international congress on automatic control, Butterworth’s, London, 481–493Google Scholar
  25. Kalman RE (1960b) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transaction of the ASME, Series D. J Basic Eng 82:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalnay E (2003) Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation and predictability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 341 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Krishnamurti TN, Jirshan X, Bedi HS, Ingles K, Dosterhof D (1991) Physical initialization of numerical weather prediction over tropics. Tellus 43A:53–81Google Scholar
  28. Kuo Y-H, Guo Y-R (1989) Dynamic initialization using observations from a hypothetical network of profilers. Mon Weather Rev 117:1975–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lakshmivarahan S, Lewis JM (2011) When is nudging optimal. Technical Report, School of Computer Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, 73019Google Scholar
  30. Lewis JM (2005) Roots of ensemble forecasting. Mon Weather Rev 133:1865–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis JM, Lakshmivarahan S, Dhall SK (2006) Dynamic data assimilation: a least squares approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 654 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis JM, Lakshmivarahan S (2008) Sasaki’s pivotal contribution: calculus of variations applied to weather map analysis. Mon Weather Rev 136:3553–3567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lorenc AC (1986) Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 112:1177–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorenc AC, Bell RS, Macpherson B (1991) The meteorological office analysis correction data assimilation scheme. Q J R Meteorol Soc 117:59–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luenberger DG (1964) Observing the state of a linear system. IEEE Trans Military Electron ME-8:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luenberger DG (1971) An introduction to observers. IEEE Trans Automat Contr AC-16:596–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynch J (2006) The emergence of numerical weather Prediction (Richardson’s dream). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 279 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Macpherson B (1991) Dynamic initialization by repeated insertion of data. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 117:965–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marquez HJ (2003) Nonlinear control systems: analysis and design.Wiley, Hoboken, 352 ppGoogle Scholar
  40. Platzman G (1979) The ENIAC computations of 1950—Gateway to numerical weather prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 60:302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramamurthy MH, Carr FH (1987) Four-dimensional data assimilation in monsoon region. I: Experiments with wind data. Mon Weather Rev 115:1678–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramamurthy MH, Carr FH (1988) Four-dimensional data assimilation in the monsoon region Part II: Role of temperature and moisture data. Mon Weather Rev 116:1896–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richardson LF (1922) Weather prediction by numerical prlocess. Cambridge University Press, London, 236 pp (Reprinted by Dover (1965, New York) with a new introduction by Sydney Chapman)Google Scholar
  44. Stauffer DR, Warner TT, Seaman NL (1985) A Newtonian “nudging” approach to four-dimensional data assimilation: use of SES-AME-IV data in a mesoscale model. Preprints, seventh conference on numerical weather prediction, American Meteorological Society, Montreal, 77–82Google Scholar
  45. Stauffer DR, Seaman NL (1990) Use of four-dimensional data assimilation in a limited-area mesoscale model, I: experiments with synoptic-scale data. Mon Weather Rev 118:1250–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stauffer DR, Bao J-W (1993) Optimal determination of nudging coefficients using adjoint equations. Tellus 45A:358–369.Google Scholar
  47. Stern WF, Ploshay JJ, Miyokoda K (1985) Continuous data assimilation at GFDL during FGGE. In: Proceedings of the ECMWF seminar/workshop: data assimilation system and observing system experiments with particular emphasis in FGGE, Shinfield Park, Reading, England, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  48. Sussmann HJ, Willems JC (1997) 300 years of optimal control from brachystochrone to the maximum principle. IEEE Contr Syst 17:32–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thacker WC, Long BR (1988) Fitting dynamics to data. J Geophys Res 93:1227–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vidard PA, Dimet FXLE, Piacentini A (2003) Determination of optimal nudging coefficients. Tellus 55A:1–15Google Scholar
  51. Warner TT (1990) Assimilation of data with mesoscale meteorological models. In: WMO international symposium of observations in meteorology and oceanography, Clermont-Ferrand, France, pp 165–170Google Scholar
  52. Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics: control and communication in the animal and machine. Wiley, New York, 194 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Yamada T, Bunker S (1989) A numerical model study of nocturnal drainage flows with strong wind and temperature gradients. J Appl Meteorol 28:545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zou X, Navon IM, Le-Dimet FX (1992) An optimal nudging data assimilation scheme using parameter estimation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 128:1163–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.National Severe Storms LaboratoryNormanUSA
  3. 3.Desert Research InstituteRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations