Cytology of Epithelial Proliferative Lesions and High-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

  • Nour Sneige
  • Gary Tse
  • Puay Hoon Tan
  • Fernando Schmitt
Chapter

Abstract

With the advent of mammographic screening, non-palpable lesions are increasingly detected. As the central dogma of triple assessment is frequently regarded as the gold standard in breast lesion assessment, some form of pathological evaluation is often performed. Both fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) are routinely used. CNB is generally considered superior to FNAC in dealing with these clinically elusive lesions that are only detected by either architectural distortion or more commonly by the presence of calcifications. CNB, compared to FNAC, has a higher sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for malignancy and lower inadequacy rate. As a result, many centers preferentially perform CNB for such evaluation, and the pure cytologic experience in dealing with these lesions are limited. In the literature, there are sporadic reports confirming the usefulness of FNAC when the clinical and radiological findings are taken into consideration.

References

  1. Abdel-Fatah TM, Powe DG, Hodi Z et al (2008) Morphologic and molecular evolutionary pathways of low nuclear grade invasive breast cancers and their putative precursor lesions: further evidence to support the concept of low nuclear grade breast neoplasia family. Am J Surg Pathol 32:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Kaisi N (1994) The spectrum of the “gray zone” in breast cytology. A review of 186 cases of atypical and suspicious cytology. Acta Cytol 38:898–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arisio R, Cuccorese C, Accinelli G et al (1998) Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in breast lesions: analysis of a series of 4,110 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 18(6):462–467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bofin AM, Lydersen S, Hagmar BM (2004) Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 31(4):207–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bondeson L, Lindholm K (1997) Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 17(5):315–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B et al (2001) The cytopathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. A detailed analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of 58 cases compared with 101 invasive ductal carcinomas. Cytopathology 12(2):107–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulgaresi P, Cariaggi MP, Bonardi L et al (2005) Analysis of morphologic patterns of fine-needle aspiration of the breast to reduce false-negative results in breast cytology. Cancer 105:152–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cangiarella J, Waisman J, Simsir A (2003) Cytologic findings with histologic correlation in 43 cases of mammary intraductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol 47(6):965–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson AE, Mulford DK, Sheils LA (1995) The cytopathology of proliferative breast disease. Comparison with features of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Clin Pathol 103:438–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ducatman BS, Wang HH, Connolly JL et al (1992) FNA identification of familial breast disease. Am J Clin Pathol 97(2):291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Feichter GE, Haberthür F, Gobat S et al (1997) Breast cytology. Statistical analysis and cytohistologic correlations. Acta Cytol 41(2):327–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishikawa T, Hamaguchi Y, Tanabe M et al (2007) False-positive and false-negative cases of fine-needle aspiration cytology for palpable breastlesions. Breast Cancer 14(4):388–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jensen RA, Page DL, Dupont WD et al (1989) Invasive breast cancer risk in women with sclerosing adenosis. Cancer 64:1977–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lilleng R, Hagmar BM, Farrants G et al (1992) Low-grade cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Fine needle aspiration cytology in three cases. Acta Cytol 36:48–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim CJ, Al-Masri H, Salhadar A et al (2004) The significance of the diagnosis of atypia in breast fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 31:285–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malamud YR, Ducatman BS, Wang HH (1992) Comparative features of comedo and noncomedo ­ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 8(6):571–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maygarden SJ, Brock MS, Novotny DB (1997) Are epithelial cells in fat or connective tissue a reliable indicator of tumor invasion in fine-needle aspiration of the breast? Diagn Cytopathol 16(2):137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McKee GT, Tildsley G, Hammond S (1999) Cytologic diagnosis and grading of ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 87(4):203–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McKee GT, Tambouret RH, Finkelstein D (2001) Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: invasive vs. in situ carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 25(1):73–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendoza P, Lacambra M, Tan PH et al (2011) Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: the nonmalignant categories. Patholog Res Int 2011:547–580Google Scholar
  21. Mulford D, Dawson AE (1994) Atypia in fine needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable and palpable mammographically detected breast lesions. Acta Cytol 38:9–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. NCI (1996) The uniform approach to breast fine needle aspirate biopsy: a synopsis. Acta Cytol 40:1120–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NIH (1997) The uniform approach to breast fine needle aspiration biopsy. Am J Surg 174:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW et al (1985) Atypical hyperplastic lesions of the female breast. A long-term follow-up study. Cancer 55:2698–2708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Park IA, Ham EK (1997) Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases. Acta Cytol 41:1131–1138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reis-Filho JS, Milanezi F, Amendoeira I (2002) p63 Staining of myoepithelial cells in breast fine needle aspirates: a study of its role in differentiating in situ from invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. J Clin Pathol 55(12):936–939PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosa M, Masood S (2011) Cytomorphology of male breast lesions: diagnostic pitfalls and clinical implications. Diagn Cytopathol 40(2):179–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saqi A, Mazziotta R, Hamele-Bena D (2004) Columnar cell lesions: fine-needle aspiration biopsy features. Diagn Cytopathol 31:370–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sauer T, Lømo J, Garred O et al (2005) Cytologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ in fine-needle aspiration of the breast mirror the histopathologic growth pattern heterogeneity and grading. Cancer 105(1):21–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shin HJ, Sneige N (1998) Is a diagnosis of infiltrating versus in situ ductal carcinoma of the breast possible in fine-needle aspiration specimens? Cancer 84:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silverman JF, Dabbs DJ, Gilbert CF (1989) Fine needle aspiration cytology of adenosis tumor of the breast. With immunocytochemical and ultrastructural observations. Acta Cytol 33:181–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sneige N (1993) Fine-needle aspiration of the breast: a review of 1,995 cases with emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 9:106–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sneige N (2000) Fine-needle aspiration cytology of in situ epithelial cell proliferation in the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 113(suppl1):S38–S48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sneige N, Staerkel GA (1994) Fine-needle aspiration cytology of ductal hyperplasia with and without atypia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Hum Pathol 25:485–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas PA, Cangiarella J, Raab SS et al (1995) Fine needle aspiration biopsy of proliferative breast disease. Mod Pathol 8:130–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tran PV, Lui PC, Yu AM et al (2010) Atypia in fine needle aspirates of breast lesions. J Clin Pathol 63:585–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tse GM, Tan PH (2010) Diagnosing breast lesions by fine needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy: which is better? Breast Cancer Res Treat 123:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tse GM, Tan PH, Cheung HS et al (2008) Intermediate to highly suspicious calcification in breast lesions: a radio-pathologic correlation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang HH, Ducatman BS (1997) Fine needle aspiration of the breast. A probabilistic approach to diagnosis of carcinoma. Acta Cytol 42:285–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zardawi IM, Hearnden F, Meyer P et al (1999) Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome. Acta Cytol 43:163–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nour Sneige
  • Gary Tse
    • 1
  • Puay Hoon Tan
    • 2
  • Fernando Schmitt
    • 3
  1. 1.Prince of Wales Hospital Department of Anatomical And Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin, NTHong Kong SAR
  2. 2.Department of PathologySingapore General HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Department of Pathology and OncologyMedical Faculty of Porto University and IPATIMUPPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations