Evaluating Simple Repository Deposit for Open Educational Resources

  • Morwan Mohamed Nour
  • Kyle Williams
  • Hussein Suleman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7634)

Abstract

The rise of technologies and simpler software tools have been identified as drivers for the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement. However, content creators have been slow to adopt current OER solutions, as is shown by weak repository deposit rates and activities. To begin to address this, a desktop tool that simplifies the deposit process and that can be integrated into the content creation workflow was created. The goal of the tool was to support metadata that could accurately describe OERs and to ensure that, when deposited using the tool, OERs were represented correctly in the repository. Evaluation of the tool by users showed its potential in simplifying the repository deposit process, encouraging the creation of OERs and motivating content creators to share. Furthermore, users were also able to represent OERs using the adopted metadata standard and were satisfied with the way in which their OERs were represented in the repository.

Keywords

open educational resources repository deposit desktop 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hylén, J.: Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. OECD Publishing (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yuan, L., MacNeill, S., Kraan, W.: Open Educational Resources - Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education. JISC CETIS OER Briefing Paper (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGill, L., Currier, S., Duncan, C., Douglas, P.: Good intentions: improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials. In: JISC (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Microsoft Research: Microsoft Article Authoring Add-in User Guide. Microsoft (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tarrant, D., Hitchcock, S., Jones, R., Brody, T., Flanders, D., MacGillvray, M., Stuart, I.: DepositMO Profile. In: JISC (2012), http://swordapp.org/docs/DepositMO.html
  6. 6.
    EDiNA: Open Access Repository Junction (2009), http://edina.ac.uk/projects/oa-rj/index.html
  7. 7.
    Wells, S.: DURA - Direct User Repository Access. In: JISC (2010), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/inf11/jiscdepo/dura.aspx
  8. 8.
    McClelland, M.: Metadata Standards for Educational Resources. Computer 36(11), 107–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IMS.: IMS Content Packaging Best Practices and Implementstion Guide. IMS Global Learning Consortium, version 1.1.3 edn. (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morwan Mohamed Nour
    • 1
  • Kyle Williams
    • 1
  • Hussein Suleman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Cape TownRondeboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations