A Game System for Speech Rehabilitation
Speech disorders are common in children and adults. For a number of these individuals, traditional speech therapy will not be successful, leaving them unable to (or poorly able) to communicate through speech. By combining recent advances in motion tracking technology with state of the art interactive gaming technology, we aim to develop a novel clinical tool that can potentially overcome the shortcomings of traditional methods. There is strong evidence that entertaining and clever visualizations not only can provide necessary augmented feedback to facilitate motor skill acquisition but, also, can be very engaging and effective teaching tools. For the first time, we want to explore the practically infinite possibilities for interactive visualizations of game engines in speech rehabilitation focused on the tongue, the primary articulator, and develop a commercial grade clinical rehabilitation tool with full security, reporting, and data management abilities.
KeywordsWave System Speech Therapy Speech Disorder Game Engine Game System
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Massaro, D., Bigler, S., Chen, T., Perlman, M., Ouni, S.: Pronunciation training: the role of eye and ear. In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2008, pp. 2623–2626 (2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Lucero, J., Maciel, S., Johns, D., Munhall, K.: Empirical modeling of human face kinematics during speech using motion clustering. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (January 2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Mcgurck, H., Macdonald, J.W.: Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264(246-248) (1976)Google Scholar
- 11.Mandel, A., Nymark, J., Balmer, S., Grinnell, D., O’Riain, M.: Electromyographic versus rhythmic positional biofeedback in computerized gait retraining with stroke patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71(9), 649–654 (1990)Google Scholar
- 12.Moreland, J., Thomson, M.A.: Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis. Phys. Ther. 74(6), 534–543 (1994); discussion 544–547Google Scholar
- 13.Beacutedard, P., Proteau, L.: On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements. Exp. Brain Res. 158(1), 75–85 (2004)Google Scholar
- 14.Franklin, D.W., So, U., Burdet, E., Kawato, M.: Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics. PLoS ONE 2(12), e1336 (2007)Google Scholar
- 17.Engwall, O.: Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning 25(1), 37–64 (2012), QC 20120416Google Scholar
- 18.Dourish, P.: Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
- 22.Unity Inc.: Unity3D, http://unity3d.com/unity/