Anonymous Preference Elicitation for Requirements Prioritization
Requirements Engineering is a very critical phase in the software development process. Requirements can be interpreted as basic decision alternatives which have to be negotiated by stakeholders. In this paper we present the results of an empirical study which focused on the analysis of key influence factors of successful requirements prioritization. This study has been conducted within the scope of software development projects at our university where development teams interacted with a requirements prioritization environment. The major result of our study is that anonymized preference elicitation can help to significantly improve the quality of requirements prioritization, for example, in terms of the degree of team consensus, prioritization diversity, and quality of the resulting software product.
KeywordsRequirements Prioritization Group Decision Making
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Yang, D., Wu, D., Koolmanojwong, S., Brown, A., Boehm, B.: Wikiwinwin: A wiki based system for collaborative requirements negotiation. In: HICCS 2008, Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, p. 24 (2008)Google Scholar
- 6.Group, G.: Hype cycle for application development: Requirements elicitation and simulation (2011)Google Scholar
- 8.Regnell, B., Paech, B., Aurum, C., Wohlin, C., Dutoit, A., Ochdag, J.: Requirements means decision! In: 1st Swedish Conf. on Software Engineering and Practice (SERP 2001), Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 49–52 (2001)Google Scholar
- 10.Wiegers, K.: First things first: Prioritizing requirements. Software Development (1999)Google Scholar
- 11.Pinsonneault, A., Heppel, N.: Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems 14, 89–108 (1997)Google Scholar
- 15.Felfernig, A., Ninaus, G.: Group recommendation algorithms for requirements prioritization. In: Workshop on Recommender Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE 2012), Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 1–4 (2012)Google Scholar