Proof of Possession for Cloud Storage via Lagrangian Interpolation Techniques

  • Łukasz Krzywiecki
  • Mirosław Kutyłowski
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7645)

Abstract

We consider Provable Data Possesion (PDP) - a protocol which enables an owner of data stored in the cloud to verify whether this data is still available in the cloud without holding a copy of the file. We propose a PDP framework based on Lagrangian interpolation in the exponent for groups with hard discrete logarithm problem. We reuse properties of this arithmetic exploited so far in broadcast encryption systems.

Keywords

provable data possession proof of retrievability cloud computing Lagrangian interpolation in the exponent broadcast encryption 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ateniese, G., Burns, R.C., Curtmola, R., Herring, J., Kissner, L., Peterson, Z.N.J., Song, D.X.: Provable data possession at untrusted stores. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 598–609 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Curtmola, R., Khan, O., Burns, R.C., Ateniese, G.: Mr-pdp: Multiple-replica provable data possession. In: ICDCS, pp. 411–420. IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chang, E.-C., Xu, J.: Remote Integrity Check with Dishonest Storage Server. In: Jajodia, S., Lopez, J. (eds.) ESORICS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5283, pp. 223–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ateniese, G., Kamara, S., Katz, J.: Proofs of Storage from Homomorphic Identification Protocols. In: Matsui, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5912, pp. 319–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dodis, Y., Vadhan, S.P., Wichs, D.: Proofs of Retrievability via Hardness Amplification. In: Reingold, O. (ed.) TCC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5444, pp. 109–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, Q., Wang, C., Li, J., Ren, K., Lou, W.: Enabling Public Verifiability and Data Dynamics for Storage Security in Cloud Computing. In: Backes, M., Ning, P. (eds.) ESORICS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5789, pp. 355–370. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erway, C.C., Küpçü, A., Papamanthou, C., Tamassia, R.: Dynamic provable data possession. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 213–222 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhu, Y., Wang, H., Hu, Z., Ahn, G.J., Hu, H., Yau, S.S.: Efficient provable data possession for hybrid clouds. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2010, pp. 756–758. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ateniese, G., Burns, R., Curtmola, R., Herring, J., Khan, O., Kissner, L., Peterson, Z., Song, D.: Remote data checking using provable data possession. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 14(1), 12:1–12:34 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, J., Wang, H., Wang, J., Tan, C., Yu, D.: Provable data possession of resource-constrained mobile devices in cloud computing. JNW 6(7), 1033–1040 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, J., Chang, E.C.: Towards efficient provable data possession. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2011, 574 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen, S.T., Tzeng, W.G.: Delegable Provable Data Possession for Remote Data in the Clouds. In: Qing, S., Susilo, W., Wang, G., Liu, D. (eds.) ICICS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7043, pp. 93–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Juels, A., Kaliski Jr., B.S.: Pors: proofs of retrievability for large files. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2007, pp. 584–597. ACM, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shacham, H., Waters, B.: Compact Proofs of Retrievability. In: Pieprzyk, J. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5350, pp. 90–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boneh, D., Shen, E., Waters, B.: Strongly Unforgeable Signatures Based on Computational Diffie-Hellman. In: Yung, M., Dodis, Y., Kiayias, A., Malkin, T. (eds.) PKC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3958, pp. 229–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kate, A., Zaverucha, G.M., Goldberg, I.: Constant-Size Commitments to Polynomials and Their Applications. In: Abe, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6477, pp. 177–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naor, M., Pinkas, B.: Efficient Trace and Revoke Schemes. In: Frankel, Y. (ed.) FC 2000. LNCS, vol. 1962, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shoup, V.: Sequences of games: a tool for taming complexity in security proofs (2006), http://www.shoup.net/papers/games.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Łukasz Krzywiecki
    • 1
  • Mirosław Kutyłowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Fundamental Problems of TechnologyWrocław University of TechnologyPoland

Personalised recommendations