Customizing Functional Electrical Therapy Using a ‘Rehabilitation Problem-Solving Form’ – A Preliminary Study

  • A. Banerjee
  • R. Kumar
  • B. Khattar
  • R. Reddi
  • A. Dutta
Part of the Biosystems & Biorobotics book series (BIOSYSROB, volume 1)

Abstract

International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model was applied as a design tool for customizing FES therapy for 10 chronic (>6months post-stroke) stroke survivors. The ICF model was implemented with an assessment document called ‘Rehabilitation Problem-Solving Form’ (RPS-Form). The online RPS-Form was used to monitor patient’s response to short-duration moderate-intensity FES therapy by assessing all the ICF components. The RPSForm presented the patients’ perspective, and therefore facilitated communications between the patient and his/her multi-disciplinary rehabilitation team consisting of physiotherapists, occupational therapists, medical doctors, and rehabilitation engineers. A 2-weeks Rehab-CYCLE of short-duration, moderately-intensive FES therapy improved activities and participation of 4 out of 10 participants, while 5 out of 10 participants consented to repeating the same Rehab-CYCLE in the clinic.

Keywords

Stroke Survivor Functional Electrical Stimulation Chronic Stroke Manual Muscle Test Modify Ashworth Scale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bogataj, U., Gros, N., Malezic, M., Kelih, B., Kilajic, M., Acimovic, R.: Restoration of gait during two to three weeks of therapy with multichannel electrical stimulation. Physical Therapy 69(5), 319–327 (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taylor, P.N., Burridge, J.H., Dunkerley, A.L., Wood, D.E., Norton, J.A., Singleton, C., Swain, I.D.: Clinical use of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator: Its effect on speed and effort of walking. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 80(12), 1577–1583 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sheffler, L.R., Hennessey, M.T., Naples, G.G., Chae, J.: Peroneal nerve stimulation versus an ankle foot orthosis for correction of footdrop in stroke: impact on functional ambulation. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 20(3), 355–360 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kottink, A.I., Hermens, H.J., Nene, A.V., Tenniglo, M.J., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., IJzerman, M.J.: Therapeutic effect of an implantable peroneal nerve stimulator in subjects with chronic stroke and footdrop: a randomized controlled trial. Phys. Ther. 88(4), 437–448 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burridge, J.H., Taylor, P.N., Swain, I.D.: The effects of common peroneal stimulation on the effort and speed of walking: a randomized controlled trial with chronic hemiplegic patients. Clinical Rehabilitation 11(3), 201–210 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hausdorff, J.M., Ring, H.: Effects of a new radio frequency controlled neuroprosthesis on gait symmetry and rhythmicity in patients with chronic hemiparesis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87(1), 4–13 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daly, J.J., Zimbelman, J., Roenigk, K.L., McCabe, J.P., Rogers, J.M., Butler, K., Burdsall, R., Holcomb, J.P., Marsolais, E.B., Ruff, R.L.: Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus no FES, with weight-supported treadmill and over-ground training. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 25(7), 588–596 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dutta, A., Khattar, B., Banerjee, A.: Nonlinear analysis of electromyogram following training with myoelectrically-triggered neuromuscular electrical stimulation in stroke survivors. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (accepted 2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stucki, G., Cieza, A., Ewert, T., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S., Ustuen, T.B.: Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil. Rehabil. 24, 281–282 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steiner, W.A., Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D., Aeschlimann, A., Stucki, G.: Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Physical Therapy 82, 1098–1107 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geyh, S., Cieza, A., Schouten, J., Dickson, H., Frommelt, P., Omar, Z., Kostanjsek, N., Ring, H., Stucki, G.: ICF Core Sets for stroke. J. Rehabil. Med. 44(Suppl.), 135–141 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Banerjee
    • 2
  • R. Kumar
    • 2
  • B. Khattar
    • 2
  • R. Reddi
    • 3
  • A. Dutta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical NeurophysiologyGeorg-August-UniversityGoettingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Physiotherapy and RehabilitationMax Superspeciality Hospital SaketNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyMax Superspeciality Hospital SaketNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations