Runtime Reconstruction of Simulation Models for Dynamic Structure Systems

  • Fa Zhang
  • Qiaoxia Zhao
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 325)


In many simulation applications, the target system may change its structure unpredictably. The simulation model should adjust in time, to follow the evolving of the target system. In this paper we put forward a new definition of system to accommodate the dynamic structural change, and classify the structural change of system, include change in components, relationships among components and interaction between system and its environment. Then we propose a distributed framework of simulation model, which supports runtime reconstruction. In this framework, connector components work together to integrate and manage computing components. These elements and their relationship are discussed using π-calculus. We study the weak bi-simulation condition in component replacing, and discuss the consistency of transition of system states. Finally, we point out main problems in modeling and simulation for dynamic structural systems.


Target System Structural Change Runtime Reconstruction Simulation Model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wein, L.M.: Homeland security: from mathematical models to policy implementation. Operations Research 57, 801–811 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tang, A.P., Wen, A.H.: An intelligent simulation system for earthquake disaster assessment. Computers & Geosciences 35, 871–879 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitchell, B., Yilmaz, L.: Symbiotic adaptive multisimulation: An autonomic simulation framework for real-time decision support under uncertainty. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 19, 1–31 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Celik, N., Lee, S., Vasudevan, K., Son, Y.-J.: DDDAS-based multi-fidelity simulation framework for supply chain systems. IIE Trans. 42, 325–341 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aydt, H., Turner, S., Cai, W., Low, M.: Research issues in symbiotic simulation. In: Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1213–1222 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitchell, M.: Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouassida, I., Guennoun, K., Drira, K., Chassot, C., Jmaiel, M.: A rule-driven approach for architectural self adaptation in collaborative activities using graph grammars. International Journal of Autonomic Computing 1, 226–245 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor, R.N., Medvidovic, N., Oreizy, P.: Runtime Software Adaptation: Framework, Approaches, and Styles. In: IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, pp. 455–461 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sangiorgi, D., Walker, D.: The π-calculus: A theory of mobile processes. Cambridge University Press (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fa Zhang
    • 1
  • Qiaoxia Zhao
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ManagementAir Force Engineering UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.School of Information &NavigationAir Force Engineering UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations