Advertisement

Many to Many Mobile Maps

  • Stephen C. HirtleEmail author
  • Martin Raubal
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

The rapid development of mobile computing devices along with a variety of Web 2.0 social networking tools has led to a dramatic change in the way maps and other spatial displays are utilized. The evolution from stand-alone desktop GIS to the interactive, mobile devices, in which information from one or more sources and is sent to one or more sinks, is discussed. The result is access to real-time information, which is generated from both traditional sources, social networks, and other specialized geowikis. Both the benefits of many to many mobile maps and the emergence of new problems, such as understanding the needs of the user and providing appropriate context, are discussed.

Keywords

Mobile computing Social computing GIS 

References

  1. Agrawala M, Li W, Berthouzoz F (2011) Design principles for visual communication. Commun ACM 54(4):60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilandzic M, Foth M, De Luca A (2008) City flocks: designing social navigation for urban mobile information systems. In: 7th ACM conference on designing interactive systems, Cape Town, South Africa, 2008. ACM, New York, pp 174–183Google Scholar
  3. Blades M (1991) Wayfinding theory and research: the need for a new approach. In: Mark D, Frank A (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 137–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2008) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Med Commun 13(1):210–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butz A, Baus J, Krüger A, Lohse M (2001) A hybrid indoor navigation system. In: IUI2001: international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, New York, pp 25–33Google Scholar
  6. Counts S, Smith M (2007) Where were we: communities for sharing space-time trails. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM international symposium on advances in geographic information systems (GIS ‘07), Seattle, WA, 2007. ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dara-Abrams D (2008) Cognitive surveying: a framework for mobile data collection, analysis, and visualization of spatial knowledge and navigation practices. In: Freksa C, Newcombe N, Gärdenfors P, Wölfl S (eds) Spatial cognition VI. learning, reasoning, and talking about space, LNCS 5248. Springer, Berlin, pp 138–153Google Scholar
  8. Davies C, Peebles D (2007) Strategies for orientation: the role of 3D landmark salience and map alignment. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Nashville, TN, 2007. Erlbaum, New York, pp 923–928 Google Scholar
  9. Dey AK, Abowd GD (2000) Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2000), vol 4. The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Espeter M, Raubal M (2009) Location-based decision support for user groups. J Locat Based Serv 3(3):165–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Espinoza F, Persson P, Sandin A, Nyström H, Bylund ECM (2001) GeoNotes: social and navigational aspects of location-based information systems. In: Abowd BS (ed) Ubicomp 2001: ubiquitous computing, international conference Atlanta, Georgia, September 30—October 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 2–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank AU (1998) Different types of “times” in GIS. In: Egenhofer MJ, Golledge RG (eds) Spatial and temporal reasoning in GIS. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 40–62Google Scholar
  13. Frank AU (2002) Big GIS/small GI—the commercialization of geographic information. In: Brazilian symposium on geoinformatics, Caxambu, Brazil, 2002Google Scholar
  14. Gluck M (1991) Making sense of human way finding: review of cognitive and linguistic knowledge for personal navigation with a new research direction. In: Mark D, Frank A (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 117–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golledge RG, Stimson RJ (1997) Spatial behavior: a geographic perspective. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJ 69(4):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grifantini K (2010) Eye tracking for mobile control. MIT Technol Rev, Cambridge 24 May 2010Google Scholar
  18. Gruber T (2008) Ontology of folksonomy: a mash-up of apples and oranges. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 3:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta M, Li R, Yin Z, Han J (2010) Survey on social tagging techniques. SIGKDD Explor 12:58–72Google Scholar
  20. Hearst MA (2008) UIs for faceted navigation: recent advances and remaining open problems. In: Workshop on human-computer interaction and information retrieval, Redmond, WA, USA, 2008Google Scholar
  21. Hegarty M, Keehner M, Cohen C, Montello DR, Lippa Y (2007) The role of spatial cognition in medicine: applications for selecting and training professionals. In: Allen GL (ed) Applied spatial cognition: from research to cognitive technology. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 285–315Google Scholar
  22. Hegarty M, Keehner M, Khooshabeh P, Montello DR (2009) How spatial abilities enhance, and are enhanced by, dental education. Learn Individ Differ 19(1):61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hillier B (1996) A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirtle SC (2011) Geographical design: spatial cognition and geographical information science (synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics). Morgan & Claypool, San RafaelGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirtle SC, Richter K-F, Srinivas S, Firth R (2010) This is the tricky part: when directions become difficult. J Sp Inf Sci 1(1):53–73Google Scholar
  26. Hirtle SC, Sorrows ME (1998) Designing a multi-modal tool for locating buildings on a college campus. J Environ Psychol 18(3):265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hutchins J, Ihler A, Smyth P (2010) Probabilistic analysis of a large-scale urban traffic sensor data set. In: Gaber MM, Vatsavai RR, Omitaomu OA, Gama J, Chawla NV, Ganguly AR (eds) Knowledge discovery from sensor data: second international workshop, Sensor-KDD 2008, LNCS 5840. Springer, Berlin, pp 94Google Scholar
  28. Ishikawa T, Fujiwara H, Imai O, Okabe A (2008) Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: a comparison with maps and direct experience. J Environ Psychol 28:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaasinen E (2005) User acceptance of location-aware mobile guides based on seven field studies. Behav Inf Technol 24:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keehner M, Lowe R (2009) Seeing with the hands and with the eyes: the contributions of haptic cues to anatomical shape recognition in surgery. In: Bertel S, Barkowsky T, Hölscher C, Shipley TF (eds) Cognitive shape processing. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 8–14Google Scholar
  31. Kuhn W, Frank AU (1991) A formalization of metaphors and image-schemas in user interfaces. In: Mark D, Frank A (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuipers B, Levitt T (1988) Navigation and mapping in large scale space. Ai Mag 9(2):25–43Google Scholar
  33. Lane ND, Miluzzo E, Lu H, Peebles D, Choudhury T, Campbell AT (2010) A survey of mobile phone sensing. Commun Mag IEEE 48(9):140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li C, Longley P (2006) A test environment for location-based services applications. Trans GIS 10(1):43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maybury MT, Wahlster W (1998) Readings in intelligent user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  36. McNulty T (2009) iBurgh lets you complain to city by cell phone. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Pittsburgh 18 Aug 2009Google Scholar
  37. Meilinger T, Knauff M, Bülthoff HH (2008) Working memory in wayfinding: a dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cogn Sci 32:755–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohan P, Padmanabhan VN, Ramjee R (2008) Nericell: Rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In: SenSys ‘08. ACM, Raleigh, North Carolina, pp 323–336Google Scholar
  39. Montello DR (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank AU, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Springer, Berlin, pp 312–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Munzer S, Zimmer HD, Schwalm M, Baus J, Aslan I (2006) Computer-assisted navigation and the acquisition of route and survey knowledge. J Environ Psychol 26(4):300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nath S, Liu J, Zhao F (2007) Sensormap for wide-area sensor webs. Computer 40:90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Parush A, Ahuvia S, Erev I (2007) Degradation in spatial knowledge acquisition when using automatic navigation systems. In: Winter S, Duckham M, Kulik L, Kuipers B (eds) Spatial information theory (COSIT 2007) vol LNCS 4736. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 238–254Google Scholar
  43. Peuquet DJ (2002) Representations of space and time. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Priedhorsky R (2011) Wiki, absurd yet successful: a position paper for CHI 2011 workshop on crowdsourcing and human computation. Paper presented at the CHI 2011. Vancouver, BC, Canada, Vancouver, BC, 7–12 May 2011Google Scholar
  45. Priedhorsky R, Jordan B, Terveen L (2007a) How a personalized geowiki can help bicyclists share information more effectively. In Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis. ACM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp 93–98)Google Scholar
  46. Priedhorsky R, Jordan B, Terveen L (2007b) How a personalized geowiki can help bicyclists share information more effectively. In: WikiSym’07, Montreal, Quebec, 2007, pp 93–98Google Scholar
  47. Raper J, Gartner G, Karimi H, Rizos C (2008) A critical evaluation of location based services and their potential. J Locat Based Serv 1:4–45Google Scholar
  48. Raubal M (2011) Cogito ergo mobilis sum: the impact of location-based services on our mobile lives. In: Nyerges T, Couclelis H, McMaster R (eds) The SAGE handbook of GIS and society. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Raubal M, Panov I (2009) A formal model for mobile map adaptation. In: Gartner G, Rehrl K (eds) Location based services and telecartography II, selected papers from the 5th international symposium on LBS & Telecartography 2008, Salzburg, Austria. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–34Google Scholar
  50. Richter KF, Dara-Abrams D, Raubal M (2010) Navigating and learning with location based services: a user-centric design. In: Gartner G, Li Y (eds) 7th international symposium on LBS & teleCartography. Guangzhou, China, pp 261–276Google Scholar
  51. Rohs M, Schöning J, Raubal M, Essl G, Krüger A (2007) Map navigation with mobile devices: virtual versus physical movement with and without visual context. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on multimodal interfaces (ICMI 2007). ACM Press, Nagoya, Japan, pp 146–153Google Scholar
  52. Schlieder C, Matyas C (2009) Photographing a city: an analysis of place concepts based on spatial choices. Sp Cogn Comput 9:212–228Google Scholar
  53. Schmidt A, Beigl M, Gellersen HW (1999) There is more to context than location. Comput Graph 23(6):893–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schöning J, Hecht B, Rohs M, Starosielski N (2007) WikEar–Automatically generated location-based audio stories between public city maps. In: Proceedings of Ubicomp’07, pp 128–131Google Scholar
  55. Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese HW (ed) Advances in child development and behavior, vol 10. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simonnet M, Vieilledent S, Jacobson D, Tisseau J (2010) The assessment of non visual maritime cognitive maps of a blind sailor: a case study. J Maps 2010:289–301Google Scholar
  58. Sorrows ME, Hirtle SC (1999) The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa C, Mark D (eds) Spatial information theory. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–50Google Scholar
  59. Turner A (2009) The role of angularity in route choice. In: Hornsby K, Claramunt C, Denis M, Ligozat G (eds) Sp Inf Theory vol LNCS 5756. Springer, Berlin, pp 489–504Google Scholar
  60. Zook M, Graham M, Shelton T, Gorman S (2012) Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: a case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Med Health Policy 2(2):7–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information SciencesUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Cartography and GeoinformationZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations