Klinische Erfassung

  • A.P. Diday-Nolle
  • S. Breier
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die klinische Erfassung gilt als richtungweisend für den Behandlungsbeginn und den -verlauf. Sie erfolgt jedoch nicht nur einmal, sondern bleibt Bestandteil des therapeutischen Vorgehens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

Zitierte Literatur

  1. American Society for Surgery of the Hand (1983) The hand: examination and diagnosis, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society for Surgery of the Hand (1990) Die Hand. Klinische Untersuchung und Diagnostik. Primartherapie haufiger Erkrankungen und Verletzungen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford RF, Nagelburg S, Adkins R (1996) Sensitivity of the Jamar Dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort. J Hand Surg 21A: 40–2Google Scholar
  4. Aulicino PL (2002) Clinical examination of the hand. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skriven TM, Schneider LH (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. Balby de, Vernon de J (1970) Savoir tout faire. Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechtol C (1954) Grip test: the use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacings. J Bone Joint Surg 36A: 82–0Google Scholar
  7. Bell-Krotoski JA, Buford WL (1988) The force/time relationship of clinically used sensory testing instruments. J Hand Ther 1(2): 76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell-Krotoski JA, Buford WL (1997) The force/time relationship of clinically used sensory testing instruments. J Hand Ther 10(4): 297–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonuccelli-Hangartner R (2001) Schmerzerfassung mit der visuellen Analogskala in der Ergotherapie. Diplomarbeit der Ergotherapieschule ZurichGoogle Scholar
  10. Brand PW (1977) Hand volumeter instruction sheet. US Public Health Services Hospital, Carville, La Brand PW (1993) Methods of clinical measurement of the hand. In:Google Scholar
  11. Brand PW, Hollister A (eds) Clinical mechanics of the hand, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I (1998) SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand - Handanweisung. Hogrefe, GottingenGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlson JD, Trombly CA (1983) The effect of wrist immobilization on performance of the Jebsen Hand Function Test. Am J OccupGoogle Scholar
  14. Ther 37: 16–7Google Scholar
  15. Daniels L, Worthingham C (1992) Muskeltest. Manuelle Untersuchungstechniken. 6. neu bearbeite Aufl. Urban & Fischer, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  16. Dehnhardt B, Harth A, Meyer A (1999) Das »Canadian Occupational Performance Measure« Handbuch. Selbstverlag, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  17. Dellon AL (1981) Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation in the hand. Williams & Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  18. Dellon AL (1988) Evaluation of sensibility and re-education of sensation in the hand. John D. Lucas Printing Co, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  19. Diday AP (1994) Ergotherapie bei Verletzungen und Erkrankungen der oberen Extremitaten. Unterrichtsunterlagen. Schule fur Ergotherapie, BielGoogle Scholar
  20. DIMDI (Deutsches Institut fur Medizinische Dokumentation und Information) (2004) Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfahigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (ICF) der WHO. Deutschsprachige Fassung www.dimdi.de. DIMDI, Koln
  21. Ewald S, Kohler U (1991) Handkraft: Richtwerte bei Erwachsenen. Fachzeitschrift des Verbandes Schweizerischer Ergotherapeuten 9Google Scholar
  22. Fess EE, Philips C (1987) Hand splinting. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  23. Fess EE (1992) Grip strength. In: American Society of Hand Therapists (ed) Clinical assessment recommendations, 2nd edn. ASHT, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  24. Fess EE (2002) Documentation: essential elements of an upper extremity assessment battery. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skriven TM, Schneider LH (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  25. Fleischhauer M, Heimann D, Hinkelmann U (2002) Leitfaden Physiotherapie. Urban & Fischer, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  26. Frey von M (1896) Untersuchung uber die Sinnesfunktionen der menschlichen Haut. Abh Sachs Ges (Akd) Wiss 40: 175–266Google Scholar
  27. Gerhardt JJ, Rippstein JR (1992) Gelenk und Bewegung. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  28. Germann G, Harth A, Wind G et al. (2003) Standardisierung und Validierung der deutschen Version 2.0 des »Disability of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH)« Fragebogens zur Outcomemessung an der oberen Extremitat. Unfallchirurg 106(1): 13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grobe-Hagel K (1989) China. Ein politisches Reisebuch. VSA-Verlag, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  30. Hackel ME, Wolfe GA, Bang SM et al. (1992) Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function. Phys Ther 72: 37–3Google Scholar
  31. Hanten WP, Chen WY, Austin AA et al. (1999) Maximum grip strength in normal subjects from 20-64 years of age. J Hand Ther 12 (3): 193–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hardy M, Jimenez S, Jabaley M et al. (1992) Evaluation of nerve compression with the Automated Tactile Tester. J Hand Surg 17: 83–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hildreth DH, Breidenbach WC, Lister GD et al. (1989) Detection of submaximal effort use of the rapid exchange grip. J Hand Surg 14: 742–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horch K, Hardy M, Jimenez S et al. (1992) An automated tactile tester for evaluation of cutaneous sensibility. J Hand Surg 17A: 82–9Google Scholar
  35. Innes E (1999) Handgrip strength testing: A review of the literature. Australian Occupational Ther J (46): 120–140Google Scholar
  36. Joughin K, Gulati P, McCabe S et al. (1993) An evaluation of rapid exchange and simultaneous grip tests. J Hand Surg Am, 18: 245–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jung B, Freund E (2000) Evaluationsmethoden fur die Hand. Manual und Befundbogen fur periphere Schadigungen. Bd 1. Eigenverlag mit Unterstutzung der DAHTH, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  38. Kapandji IA (1984) Funktionelle Anatomie der Gelenke, Bd 1. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  39. Kapandji IA (2006) Funktionelle Anatomie der Gelenke, 4. Aufl. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  40. Kendall FP, Kendall McCreary E (1988) Muskeln. Funktionen und Tests. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  41. Kramer KL, Stock M, Winter M (1997) Klinikleitfaden Orthopadie, 3. neu bearbeitete Aufl. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  42. Lippert H (1989) Anatomie am Lebenden. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. MacDermid JC, Tottenham V (2004) Responsiveness of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) and patient-rated wrist/ hand evaluation (PRWHE) in evaluating change after hand therapy. J Hand Ther 17(1): 18–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. MacDermid JC (1996) Development of a Scale for Patient Rating of Wrist Pain and Disability. J Hand Ther 9(2): 178–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mannerfelt L (1966) Studies on the hand in ulnar nerve palsy. Acta Orthop Scand, Suppl 87Google Scholar
  46. Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G et al. (1985) Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66: 69–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mathiowetz V (1990) Effects of three trials on grip and pinch strength measurements. J Hand Ther 3(4): 195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCormack GL (1988) Pain management by occupational therapists. Am J Occup Ther 42(9): 582–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Michal C, Jung B (2009) Befundsystem fur die Handtherapie. Evaluation peripherer Handfunktionsstorungen, Springer Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  50. Moberg E (1958) Objective methods for determing the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg 40B: 45–4Google Scholar
  51. Moberg E (1991) The Unsolved Problem - How to test the functional value of Hand sensibility. J Hand Ther 4(3): 105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ng CL, Ho DD, Chow SP (1999) The Moberg Pickup Test: results of testing with a standard protocol. J Hand Ther 12(4): 309–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nigst H, Buck-Gramcko D, Millesi H (1983) Handchirurgie, Bd II. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  54. Novak CB, Mackinnon SE (2005) Evaluation of nerve injury and nerve compression in the upper quadrant. J Hand Ther 18(2): 230–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Riain S (1973) New and simple test of nerve function in the hand. Br Med J 22: 61–5Google Scholar
  56. Perry JF, Hamilton GF, Lachenbruch PA et al. (1974) Protective sensation in the hand and its correlation to the Ninhydrin sweat test following nerve laceration. Am J Phys Med 53: 11–3Google Scholar
  57. Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H et al. (1989) Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther 43:444–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phelps P, Walker E (1977) Comparison of the finger wrinkling test results to established sensory tests in peripheral nerve injury. Am J Occup Ther 31: 9Google Scholar
  59. Pieper W (1979) Die graphische Darstellung der Fingerbeweglichkeit im Greifraum. In: Handchirurgie 11: 7–5Google Scholar
  60. Prince K von, Butler B (1967) Measuring sensory function of the hand in peripheral nerve injuries. Am J Occup Ther 21: 38–5Google Scholar
  61. Richards L, Palmiter-Thomas P (1996) Grip strength measurement: a critical review of tools, methods and clinical utility. Physical Rehab Med 8: 87–109Google Scholar
  62. Rosen B, Lundborg G (1998) A new tactile gnosis instrument in sensibility testing. J Hand Ther 11(3): 251–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosen B, Lundborg G (2000) A model instrument for the documentation of outcome after nerve repair. J Hand Surg 25A:535–543Google Scholar
  64. Schmeitzky C (1995) Manuelle Therapie. Kurs-Scriptum. SAMT-Seminare, SchaffhausenGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmidt R, Toews J (1970) Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Arch Phys Med Rehab: 321–327Google Scholar
  66. Schwanholt C, Stern PJ (1984) Measuring cone for thumb abduction/ extension. Am J Occup Ther 38(4): 263–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Seymour J (1977) The complete book of self-sufficiency. Faber and Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Shechtmann O, Taylor C. (2000) The use of the rapid exchange griptest in detecting sincerity of effort, part II: validity of the test. J Hand Ther 13(3): 203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strauch B, Lang A, Ferder M et al. (1997) The Ten Test. Plast Reconstr Surg 99: 1074–1078Google Scholar
  70. Tassler PL, Dellon AL (1995) Correlation of measurements of pressure perception using the pressure-specified sensory device with electrodiagnostic testing. J Occup Environ Med 37: 86–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tredgett MW, Davis TR (2000) Rapid repeat testing of grip strength for detection of faked hand weakness. Br J Hand Surg 25: 372–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tubiana R, Thomme JM, Mackin E (1996) Examination of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  73. Velze van CA, Kluever I, Merwe van der CA et (1991) The difference in volume of dominant and nondominant hand. J Hand Ther 4(1): 6–9Google Scholar
  74. Wallstrom A, Nordenskiold U (2001) Assessing hand grip endurance with repetitive maximal isometric contractions. J Hand Ther 14(4): 279–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber E (1835) Ueber den Tastsinn. Arch Anat Physiol Wissen Med (Muller's Archives) 1: 152–159Google Scholar
  76. Weinstein S (1993) Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein enhanced sensory test. J Hand Ther 6 (I): 11-22. comments 50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. World Health Organisation WHO (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Weiterführende Literatur

  1. Allieu Y et al. (1987) Les plaies de la main. De la microchirurgie aux techniques modernes de reeducation. Sauramps medical, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society of Hand Therapists (1992). Clinical Assessment Recommendations, 2nd edn. ASHT, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EE, Figarola JH et al. (1995) Threshold detection and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Ther 8(2): 155–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell-Krotoski JA (2002) Sensibility testing with the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skriven TM, Schneider LH (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell-Krotoski JA (2002) Biomechanics and evaluation of the hand. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skriven TM, Schneider LH (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  6. Breier S (1989) Evaluationsmethoden in der Handtherapie. Praxis Ergotherapie 2: 68–78Google Scholar
  7. Callahan AD (2002) Sensibility assessment for nerve lesions-in-continuity and nerve lacerations. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, CallahanGoogle Scholar
  8. AD, Skriven TM, Schneider LH (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark G, Shaw E, Wilgis ES et al. (1993) Hand rehabilitation. A practical guide. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  10. Cotta H, Heipertz W, Kersten H. (1985) Krankengymnastik, Bd 5: Orthopadie. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl H, Ro.ler A (2000) Grundlagen der Manuellen Therapie, 2. Aufl. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  12. Debrunner HU (1985) Orthopadie. Die Storungen des Bewegungsapparates in Klinik und Praxis. Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  13. Dellon AL (1978) The moving two point discrimination test: Clinical evaluation of the quickly adapting fiber receptor system. J Hand Surg Am 3: 474–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dellon AL (2000) Somatosensory testing and rehabilitation. TheInstitute for Peripheral Nerve Surgery, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  15. Diday AP, Pahud M, Slatosch U, Waldner B (1991) Ergotherapie in der Handchirurgie, Teil I. Schweizerische Arbeitsgruppe »Hand«, BielGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerlach U, Matthias H, Wirth W (1984) Die rheumatische Hand. Probleme in Praxis und Klinik. Colloquia rheumatologica 20. Werk-Verlag, MunchenGoogle Scholar
  17. Groupe d’Etudes et de Recherche des Ortheses du Membre Superieur (1984) Bull 6, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  18. Hausser R (1972) Gerat zur Messung des Finger-Extensions-Ausfalls. Fachzeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schweizerischer Ergotherapeuten 3, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoppenfeld S (1982) Klinische Untersuchung der Wirbelsaule und der Extremitaten. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD (1990) Rehabilitation of the hand: surgery and therapy, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  21. Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skirven TM et al. (2002) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 5th edn. Mosby, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Matev IB, Bankov SD (1982) Rehabilitation der Hand. Thieme, Stuttgart Maitland GD (1988) Manipulation der peripheren Gelenke. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. MacDermid JC, Lee A, Richards RS et al. (2004) Individual finger strength: Are the ulnar digits »powerful«? J Hand Ther 17(3): 364–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McRae R (1984) Klinisch-orthopadische Untersuchung. Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  25. Moberg E (1972) Dringliche Handchirurgie. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  26. Muller C, Jungo MA, Lehmann R et al. (1995) Prufverfahren der Handfunktionen. Eine testologisch aufgearbeitete Ubersicht fur die ergotherapeutische Praxis. Eigenverlag, TschuggGoogle Scholar
  27. Nigst H, Scharizer E (1991) Untersuchung der Hand. Hippokrates, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  28. Rentsch HP, Bucher PO (2005) ICF in der Rehabilitation. Die praktische nwendung der internationalen Klassifikation der Funktionsfahigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit im Rehabilitationsalltag. Schulz-Kirchner, IdsteinGoogle Scholar
  29. Seyfried A (1984) Pathophysiologische Grundlagen der Bewegungstherapie chronisch entzundlicher Gelenk- und Wirbelsaulenerkrankungen. Eular, BaselGoogle Scholar
  30. Verband Schweizerischer Ergotherapeuten (VSE) (1982) Ergotherapie. Arbeitsmaterialien zum Projekt Ergotherapie-Aktivierungstherapie 1978-1982. VSE, Zurich (Deutsche Ausgabe vergriffen)Google Scholar
  31. Villeco JP, Mackin EJ, Hunter JM (2002) Edema: therapist's management. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, Skriven TM,Google Scholar
  32. Schneider LH (eds) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  33. Waylet-Rendall J, Seibly D (1991) A study of the accuracy of a commercially available volumeter. J Hand Ther 4(1): 10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeitschrift fur Handtherapie. Rehabilitation der oberen Extremitat (2000) Sonderheft Nerven. Offizielles Organ der Deutschen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handtherapie e.V. 3(2)Google Scholar
  35. WHO (2001) ICIDH-2 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Final draft. Fullversion. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A.P. Diday-Nolle
  • S. Breier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations