Evaluation of Bluetooth Properties for Indoor Localisation

Chapter

Abstract

Current indoor localisation systems make use of common wireless signals such as Bluetooth, WiFi to track the users inside a building. Amongst those, Bluetooth has been widely known for its low-power consumption, small maintenance cost, as well as its wide-spread amongst the commodity devices. Understanding the properties of such wireless signal definitely aids the tracking system design. However, little research has been done to understand the properties of Bluetooth wireless signal amongst the current Bluetooth-based tracking systems. In this chapter, the most important Bluetooth properties related to indoor localisation are experimentally investigated from a statistical perspective. A Bluetooth-based tracking system is proposed and evaluated with the location fingerprinting technique to incorporate the Bluetooth properties described in the chapter.

Keywords

Indoor localisation Bluetooth properties Location fingerprinting 

References

  1. Addlesee M, Curwen R, Hodges S, Newman J, Steggles P, Ward A, Hopper A (2001): Implementing a sentient computing system. IEEE Comput 34:50–56Google Scholar
  2. Anastasi G, Bandelloni R, Conti M, Delmastro F, Gregori E, Mainetto G (2003) Experimenting an indoor Bluetooth-based positioning service. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on distributed computing systems workshops, pp 480–483Google Scholar
  3. Bahl P, Padmanabhan V (2000) RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. INFOCOM 2000, 19th Annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, vol 2, pp 775–784Google Scholar
  4. Bargh M, Groote R (2008) Indoor localization based on response rate of Bluetooth inquiries. MELT 2008. Proceedings of the first ACM international workshop on Mobile entity localization and tracking in GPS-less environmentsGoogle Scholar
  5. Battiti R, Nhat T, Villani A (2002) Location-aware computing: a neural network model for determining location in wireless LANs. Technical report DIT-02-0083, University of TrentoGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunato M, Kallo C (2002) Transparent location fingerprinting for wireless services. Technical report DIT-02-071, University of TrentoGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruno R, Delmastro F (2003) Design and analysis of a Bluetooth-based indoor localization system. Personal wireless communications, pp 711–725Google Scholar
  8. Chandra S (2003) Wireless network interface energy consumption. Multimedia Syst J 9:185–201 (Springer)Google Scholar
  9. Frost C, Jensen CS, Luckow KS, Thomsen B, Hansen R (2012) Bluetooth Indoor positioning system using fingerprinting. Mobile lightweight wireless systems, pp 136–150Google Scholar
  10. Hay S, Harle R (2009) Bluetooth tracking without discoverability. Location and context awareness. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5561:120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harter A, Hopper A, Steggles P, Ward A, Webster P (1999) The anatomy of a context-aware application. MobiCom 1999. In Proceedings of the 5th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp 59–68Google Scholar
  12. Hightower J, Boriello G (2001) Location systems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Comput Mag 34(8):57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang A (2005) The use of Bluetooth in Linux and location aware computing. M.Sc Thesis, MITGoogle Scholar
  14. Hallberg J, Nilsson M, Synnes K (2003) Positioning with Bluetooth. ICT 2003: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on telecommunications, pp 954–958Google Scholar
  15. Jevring M, Groote R, Hesselman C (2008) Dynamic optimization of Bluetooth networks for indoor localization. AASN 2008: First international workshop on automated and autonomous sensor networksGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaemarungsi K, Krishnamurthy P (2004) Modeling of indoor positioning systems based on location fingerprinting. INFOCOM 2004. 23rd annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societiesGoogle Scholar
  17. Li B, Salter J, Depster A, Rizos C (2006) Indoor positioning techniques based on wireless LAN. In Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International conference on wireless broadband and ultra wideband communicationsGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin T, Lin P (2005) Performance comparison of indoor positioning techniques based on location fingerprinting in wireless networks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international conference on wireless networks, communications and mobile computingGoogle Scholar
  19. Madhavapeddy A, Tse A (2005) A study of Bluetooth propagation using accurate indoor location mapping. UbiComp 2005Google Scholar
  20. Naya F, Noma H, Ohmura R, Kogure K (2005) Bluetooth-based indoor proximity sensing for nursing context awareness. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE international symposium on wearable computers, pp 212–213Google Scholar
  21. Nguyen KA (2011) Robot-based evaluation of bluetooth fingerprinting. M.Phil thesis. University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Orozco-Ochoa S, Vila-Sobrino XA, Rodríguez-Damián M, Rodríguez-Linares L (2011) Bluetooth-bases system for tracking people localization at home. Advances in intelligent and soft computing, Vol 91/2011, pp 345–352Google Scholar
  23. Priyantha N (2005) The cricket indoor location system. Ph.D thesis. MITGoogle Scholar
  24. Pandya D, Jain R, Lupu E (2003) Indoor location estimation using multiple wireless technologies. PIMRC 2003: 14th IEEE proceedings on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, pp 2208–2212Google Scholar
  25. Taheri A, Singh A, Agu E (2004) Location fingerprinting on infrastructure 802.11 wireless local area networks (WLANs) using Locus. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annuel IEEE international conference on local computer networksGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang R, Zhao F, Luo H, Lu B, Lu T (2011) Fusion of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for indoor localization. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on mobile location-based service, pp 63–66Google Scholar
  27. Want R, Hopper A, Falcao V, Gibbons J (1992) The active badge location system. ACM Trans Inf Syst 10:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiang Z, Song S, Chen J, Wang H (2004) A wireless LAN-based indoor positioning technology. IBM J Res DevGoogle Scholar
  29. Youssef M, Agrawala A (2003) On the optimality of WLAN location determination systems. Technical report. CS-TR-4459 UMIACS, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  30. Youssef M, Agrawala A (2005) The Horus WLAN location determination system. MobiSys 2005. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and servicesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceRoyal Holloway, University of LondonEghamUK

Personalised recommendations