Would Granny Let an Assistive Robot into Her Home?
Assistive robots have received considerable research attention due to the increase of the senior population around the world and the shortage of caregivers. However, limited attention has been paid to involving seniors in the design process in order to elicit their attitudes and perception of having their own robot. This study addresses this issue. We conducted a workshop with 14 Swedish seniors age 65 to 86. The findings indicate that: (1) the functionality of the robot is far more important than the appearance; (2) the usefulness will determine the acceptance of a robot; (3) seniors feel it is important to keep up to date with new technological developments; (4) assistive robots were not perceived as intrusive and having a robotic presence in the seniors’ bathrooms and bedrooms was considered acceptable. These findings suggest that seniors are prepared to give assistive robots a try if the robot is perceived as useful.
KeywordsParticipatory design attention cards assistive robots old adults
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Lesnoff-Caravaglia, G.: Gerontechnology: Growing Old in a Technological Society. Charles C Thomas Publisher, LTD., Springfield (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Norman, D.A.: Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Massimi, M., Baecker, R.: Participatory Design Process with Older Users. In: Proc. UbiCoomp (2006)Google Scholar
- 6.Ehn, P.: Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, pp. 41–77 (1993)Google Scholar
- 7.Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., Wensveen, S.: Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Svanaes, D., Seland, G.: Putting the users center stage: role playing and low-fi prototyping enable end users to design mobile systems, pp. 479–486. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
- 12.Beer, J.M., Smarr, C.A., Chen, T.L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T.L., Kemp, C.C., Rogers, W.A.: The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place, pp. 335–342. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
- 13.Wu, Y.H., Fassert, C., Rigaud, A.S.: Designing robots for the elderly: Appearance issue and beyond. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (2011)Google Scholar
- 15.Mori, M.: The uncanny valley. Energy 7(4), 33–35 (1970)Google Scholar
- 16.Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Tanie, K.: Analysis of factors that bring mental effects to elderly people in robot assisted activity, vol. 1152, pp. 1152–1157. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
- 17.Shibata, T., Wada, K., Tanie, K.: Statistical analysis and comparison of questionnaire results of subjective evaluations of seal robot in Japan and UK, vol. 3153, pp. 3152–3157. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
- 18.Vines, J., Blythe, M., Lindsay, S., Dunphy, P., Monk, A., Olivier, P.: Questionable concepts: critique as resource for designing with eighty somethings, pp. 1169–1178. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
- 19.Halskov, K., Dalsgård, P.: Inspiration card workshops. In: DIS 2006, pp. 2–11. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 20.Lucero, A., Arrasvuori, J.: PLEX Cards: a source of inspiration when designing for playfulness. In: Proc. of Fun and Games 2010, pp. 28–37. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
- 21.Brandt, E., Messeter, J.: Facilitating collaboration through design games. In: Proc. Participatory design, vol. 1, pp. 121–131. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
- 22.Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot: a suggested toolkit, pp. 528–533. IEEE Press (2009)Google Scholar
- 23.Mollenkopf, H., Kaspar, R.: Elderly people’s use and acceptance of information and communication technologies. Young Technologies in old Hands an International View on Senior Citizen‘s Utilization of ICT, DJØF, 41–58 (2005)Google Scholar
- 25.Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A.: Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage (2009)Google Scholar
- 26.Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V.: Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 399–426 (2005)Google Scholar
- 28.Massimi, M., Baecker, R.M., Wu, M.: Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones. In: Proc. ASSETS 2007, pp. 155–162 (2007)Google Scholar