How Can a Social Robot Facilitate Children’s Collaboration?

  • Michihiro Shimada
  • Takayuki Kanda
  • Satoshi Koizumi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7621)

Abstract

We used a social robot as a teaching assistant in a class for children’s collaborative learning. The class was designed to be learner-centered, and we formed a class only with a robot and children but without adults. In the class, a group of 6th graders learned together using Lego Mindstorms for seven lessons. Robovie managed the class and explained how to use Lego Mindstorms, then children freely tested their ideas to achieve a given task in each class. In addition, Robovie performed social behaviors, which aimed to build relationships with and encourage the children. Beyond this design, we observed that such social behaviors facilitated interaction among children, which made the class more enjoyable and motivated children to want Robovie around again. In this paper, we report our exploratory analysis about when such social behaviors facilitated interaction among children.

Keywords

Communication robot Robot for children Field experiments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burgard, W., Cremers, A.B., Fox, D., Hahnel, D., Lakemeyer, G., Schulz, D., Steiner, W., Thrun, S.: The Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot. In: National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 11–18 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by ’collaborative learning’? In: Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han, J., Jo, M., Park, S., Kim, S.: The Educational Use of Home Robots for Children. In: IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 378–383 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H.: Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial. In: Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 19, pp. 61–84 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lau, K.W., Tan, H.K., Erwin, B.T., Petrovic, P.: Creative Learning in School with LEGO@ Programmable Robotics Products. In: ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Educations Conference, pp.12D4/26-12D4/31 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyake, N.: Constructive lnteraction and the Iterative Process of Understanding. Cognitive Science 10, 151–177 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mosley, P., Kline, R.: Engaging students: a framework using LEGO robotics to teach problem solving. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 24, 39–45 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saerbeck, M., Schut, T., Bartneck, C., Janse, M.D.: Expressive Robots in Education: Varying the Degree of Social Supportive Behavior of a Robotic Tutor. In: ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1613–1622 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Interactive Humanoid Robots for a Science Museum. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 25–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slavin, R.E.: Cooperative Learning. Review of Educational Research 50, 315–342 (1980)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanda, T., Shimada, M., Koizumi, S.: Children learning with a social robot. In: The 2012 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 351–358 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michihiro Shimada
    • 1
  • Takayuki Kanda
    • 1
  • Satoshi Koizumi
    • 1
  1. 1.Souraku-gunJapan

Personalised recommendations