Scrum Conceptualization Using K-CRIO Ontology

  • Yishuai Lin
  • Vincent Hilaire
  • Nicolas Gaud
  • Abderrafiaa Koukam
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 116)


Many enterprises are on the path towards the automation of their business processes. To be fully efficient this kind of automation needs to rely on rich models of business processes. This paper presents an ontology, named K-CRIO, that allows the description of a specific kind of business processes: those that are dedicated to the design of a product. This ontology draws from organizational theories. The contribution of this paper is twofold. On the one hand, it described the key concepts and relationships of the k-CRIO ontology and on the other hand it illustrates this ontology by taking the example of the Scrum development process.


Business Process Multiagent System Composite Process User Story Rich Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Beco, S., Cantalupo, B., Giammarino, L., Matskanis, N., Surridge, M.: OWL-WS: A workflow ontology for dynamic grid service composition. In: eScience, pp. 148–155. IEEE Computer Society (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R.: Preliminaries to a dolce ontology of organizations. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 4(4), 225–238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cantador, I., Castells, P.: Multilayered Semantic Social Network Modeling by Ontology-Based User Profiles Clustering: Application to Collaborative Filtering. In: Staab, S., Svátek, V. (eds.) EKAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4248, pp. 334–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cossentino, M., Gaud, N., Galland, S., Hilaire, V., Koukam, A.: A Holonic Metamodel for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design. In: Mařík, V., Vyatkin, V., Colombo, A.W. (eds.) HoloMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4659, pp. 237–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cossentino, M., Gaud, N., Hilaire, V., Galland, S., Koukam, A.: Aspecs: an agent-oriented software process for engineering complex systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 20, 260–304 (2010), doi:10.1007/s10458-009-9099-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deemer, P., Benefield, G., Larman, C., Vodde, B.: The scrum primer. Technical report (2010),
  8. 8.
    Fox, M.S., Barbuceanu, M., Gruninger, M.: An organisation ontology for enterprise modeling: Preliminary concepts for linking structure and behaviour. Computers in Industry 29(1-2), 123–134 (1996); WET ICE 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: A Model for the Structural, Functional, and Deontic Specification of Organizations in Multiagent Systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 118–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, Y., Hilaire, V., Gaud, N., Koukam, A.: K-CRIO: An Ontology for Organizations Involved in Product Design. In: Cherifi, H., Zain, J.M., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds.) DICTAP 2011 Part II. CCIS, vol. 167, pp. 362–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martin, D., Paolucci, M., McIlraith, S., Burstein, M., McDermott, D., McGuinness, D.L., Parsia, B., Payne, T.R., Sabou, M., Solanki, M., Srinivasan, N., Sycara, K.: Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 26–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGuinness, D.L., Van Harmelen, F.:
  13. 13.
    Mika, P.: Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. J. Web Sem. 5(1), 5–15 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodrguez-Garca, D., Barriocanal, E.G., Alonso, S.S., Nuzzi, C.R.-S.: Defining software process model constraints with rules using owl and swrl. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauermann, L., Van Elst, L., Dengel, A.: Pimo - a framework for representing personal information models. In: Proceedings of I-Semantics 2007, JUCS, pp. 270–277 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17. Scrum phases (2009),
  18. 18.
    Vallet, D., Mylonas, P., Corella, M.A., Fuentesa, J.M., Castells, P., Avrithis, Y.: A semantically-enhanced personalization framework for knowledge-driven media services. In: IADIS WWW/Internet Conference, pp. 11–18 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yishuai Lin
    • 1
  • Vincent Hilaire
    • 1
  • Nicolas Gaud
    • 1
  • Abderrafiaa Koukam
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Systèmes et Transports (SeT)Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard (UTBM)Belfort CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations