Learning Software-Maintenance Tasks in the Transition Phase of Offshore Outsourcing Projects: Two Learning-Theoretical Perspectives

  • Oliver Krancher
  • Jens Dibbern
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 130)

Abstract

The increasing practice of offshore outsourcing software maintenance has posed the challenge of effectively transferring knowledge to individual software engineers of the vendor. In this theoretical paper, we discuss the implications of two learning theories, the model of work-based learning (MWBL) and cognitive load theory (CLT), for knowledge transfer during the transition phase. Taken together, the theories suggest that learning mechanisms need to be aligned with the type of knowledge (tacit versus explicit), task characteristics (complexity and recurrence), and the recipients’ expertise. The MWBL proposes that learning mechanisms need to include conceptual and practical activities based on the relative importance of explicit and tacit knowledge. CLT explains how effective portfolios of learning mechanisms change over time. While job-shadowing, completion tasks, and supportive information may prevail at the outset of transition, they may be replaced by the work on conventional tasks towards the end of transition.

Keywords

Software Maintenance Learning Offshore Outsourcing Transition Phase Cognitive Load Theory Work-Based Learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nosek, J.T., Palvia, P.: Software maintenance management: changes in the last decade. Journal of Software Maintenance: Research and Practice 2, 157–174 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Von Mayrhauser, A., Vans, A.M.: Program comprehension during software maintenance and evolution. Computer 28, 44–55 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.: Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals. Information Systems Journal 14, 313–342 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wastell, D.G.: Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: overcoming the social defenses with transitional objects. MIS Quarterly, 581–600 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boh, W.F., Slaughter, S.A., Espinosa, J.A.: Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Science 53, 1315–1331 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tiwari, V.: Transition During Offshore Outsourcing: A Process Model. In: Thirtieth International Conference of Information Systems, Phoenix (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dibbern, J., Winkler, J., Heinzl, A.: Explaining variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Quarterly 32, 333–366 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oshri, I., Van Fenema, P., Kotlarsky, J.: Knowledge transfer in globally distributed teams: the role of transactive memory. Information Systems Journal 18, 593–616 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chua, A., Pan, S.: Knowledge transfer and organizational learning in IS offshore sourcing. Omega 36, 267–281 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blumenberg, S., Wagner, H.T., Beimborn, D.: Knowledge transfer processes in IT outsourcing relationships and their impact on shared knowledge and outsourcing performance. International Journal of Information Management 29, 342–352 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wende, E., Philip, T., Dubberke, S.: Storytelling–an instrument to bolster knowledge transfer in offshore software projects. In: The Third Global Sourcing Workshop, Keystone (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Williams, C.: Client–vendor knowledge transfer in IS offshore outsourcing: insights from a survey of Indian software engineers. Information Systems Journal (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raelin, J.A.: A model of work-based learning. Organization Science, 563–578 (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Paas, F.G.W.C.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10, 251–296 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review 17, 147–177 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kolb, D.A.: Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy (1958); U of Chicago P, Chicago (1962)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Norman, D.A.: Accretion, Tuning and Restructuring: Three Modes of Learning. In: Cotton, J.W., Klatzky, R.L. (eds.) Semantic Factors in Cognition, pp. 37–53. Erlbaum, Hilsdale (1978)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Craik, F.I., Tulving, E.: Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104, 268 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Godden, D.R., Baddeley, A.D.: Context dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology 66, 325–331 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen, J., McQueen, R.J.: Knowledge transfer processes for different experience levels of knowledge recipients at an offshore technical support center. Information Technology & People 23, 54–79 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rottman, J.: Successful knowledge transfer within offshore supplier networks: a case study exploring social capital in strategic alliances. Journal of Information Technology 23, 31–43 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, J.: Exploring Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Building at Offshore Technical Support Centers. University of Waikato (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., Cierniak, G.: The scientific value of cognitive load theory: A research agenda based on the structuralist view of theories. Educational Psychology Review 21, 43–54 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schnotz, W., Kürschner, C.: A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review 19, 469–508 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Clark, R.E., De Croock, M.B.M.: Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development 50, 39–64 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chase, W.G., Simon, H.A.: Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4, 55–81 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Merrill, M.D.: First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 50, 43–59 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Krancher
    • 1
  • Jens Dibbern
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Information SystemsUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations