Advertisement

Dimensions of Argumentation in Social Media

  • Jodi Schneider
  • Brian Davis
  • Adam Wyner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7603)

Abstract

Mining social media for opinions is important to governments and businesses. Current approaches focus on sentiment and opinion detection. Yet, people also justify their views, giving arguments. Understanding arguments in social media would yield richer knowledge about the views of individuals and collectives. Extracting arguments from social media is difficult. Messages appear to lack indicators for argument, document structure, or inter-document relationships. In social media, lexical variety, alternative spellings, multiple languages, and alternative punctuation are common. Social media also encompasses numerous genres. These aspects can confound the extraction of well-formed knowledge bases of argument. We chart out the various aspects in order to isolate them for further analysis and processing.

Keywords

Social Medium Argumentation Scheme Argumentation Framework Lexical Variety Dialogue Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429–448 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 93, 63–101 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artificial Intelligence 171(5-6), 286–310 (2007)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, C., Ibekwe-Sanjuan, F., Juan, E.S., Weaver, C.: Visual analysis of conflicting opinions. In: Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, VAST (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Moor, A., Efimova, L.: An argumentation analysis of weblog conversations. In: The 9th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2004), Rutgers University, pp. 2–3 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–357 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu, Y., Zhai, C., Sundaresan, N.: Rated aspect summarization of short comments. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Titov, I., McDonald, R.: Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker, M.A., Anand, P., Abbott, R., Tree, J.E.F., Martell, C., King, J.: That’s your evidence?: Classifying stance in online political debate. Decision Support Sciences (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, N.J. (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Walton, D.N.: Commitment in dialogue. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: A functional perspective on argumentation schemes. In: Proceedings of Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wyner, A., Schneider, J., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Semi-automated argumentative analysis of online product reviews. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2012 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jodi Schneider
    • Brian Davis
      • Adam Wyner
        • 1
      1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of LiverpoolUK

      Personalised recommendations