The Live OWL Documentation Environment: A Tool for the Automatic Generation of Ontology Documentation

  • Silvio Peroni
  • David Shotton
  • Fabio Vitali
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7603)

Abstract

In this paper we introduce LODE, the Live OWL Documentation Environment, an online service that automatically generates a human-readable description of any OWL ontology (or, more generally, an RDF vocabulary), taking into account both ontological axioms and annotations, and ordering these with the appearance and functionality of a W3C Recommendations document. This documentation is presented to the user as an HTML page with embedded links for ease of browsing and navigation. We have tested LODE’s completeness and usability by recording the success of test users in completing tasks of ontology comprehension, and here present the results of that study.

Keywords

LODE OWL ontologies Web tools ontology documentation user testing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Basca, C., Corlosquet, S., Cyganiak, R., Fernández, S., Schandl, T.: Neologism: Easy Vocabulary Publishing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web (2008), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-368/paper10.pdf (last visited June 28, 2012)
  2. 2.
    Berrueta, D., Phipps, J.: Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies. W3C Working Group Note (August 28, 2008), World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-vocab-pub/ (last visited June 28, 2012)
  3. 3.
    Boley, H., Hallmark, G., Kifer, M., Paschke, A., Polleres, A., Reynolds, D.: RIF Core Dialect. W3C Recommendation (June 22, 2010), World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-core/ (last visited June 28, 2012)
  4. 4.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996) ISBN: 978-0748404600Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Watson, more than a Semantic Web search engine. Semantic Web – Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 2(1), 55–63 (2011), doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0031Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Iorio, A., Peroni, S., Vitali, F.: A Semantic Web Approach To Everyday Overlapping Markup. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(9), 1696–1716 (2011), doi:10.1002/asi.21591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dragan, L., Handschuh, S., Decker, S.: The semantic desktop at work: interlinking notes. In: Proceedings the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS 2011 (2011), doi:10.1145/2063518.2063521Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. DCMI Metadata Terms. DCMI Recommendation (2010), http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ (last visited June 28, 2012)
  9. 9.
    Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1. DCMI Recommendation (2010), http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/ (last visited June 28, 2012)
  10. 10.
    Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web – Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 2(1), 11–21 (2011), doi:10.3233/SW-2011-0025Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horridge, M., Patel-Schneider, P.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Manchester Syntax. W3C Working Group Note (October 27, 2009), World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/ (last visited June 28, 2012)
  12. 12.
    Knublauch, H., Horridge, M., Musen, M.A., Rector, A.L., Stevens, R., Drummond, N., Lord, P.W., Noy, N.F., Seidenberg, J., Wang, H.: The Protege OWL Experience. In: Proceedings of the OWLED 2005 Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (2005), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-188/sub14.pdf (last visited June 28, 2012)
  13. 13.
    Lewis, J.R., Sauro, J.: The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 94–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Motta, E., Mulholland, P., Peroni, S., d’Aquin, M., Gomez-Perez, J.M., Mendez, V., Zablith, F.: A Novel Approach to Visualizing and Navigating Ontologies. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 470–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oren, E., Delbru, R., Catasta, M., Cyganiak, R., Stenzhorn, H., Tummarello, G.: Sindice.com: a document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies 3(1), 37–52 (2008), doi:10.1504/IJMSO.2008.021204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sauro, J.: A Practical Guide to the System Usability Scale: Background, Benchmarks & Best Practices (2011) ISBN: 978-1461062707Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics 5(2), 51–53 (2007), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (1998) ISBN: 978-0803959408Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A.: Ontology Engineering in a Networked World. Springer, Berlin (2012) ISBN: 978-3642247934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tejo-Alonso, C., Berrueta, D., Polo, L., Fernández, S.: Metadata for Web Ontologies and Rules: Current Practices and Perspectives. In: García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds.) MTSR 2011. CCIS, vol. 240, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvio Peroni
    • 1
  • David Shotton
    • 2
  • Fabio Vitali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BolognaItaly
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations