An Improved Stereo Matching Algorithm with Ground Plane and Temporal Smoothness Constraints

  • Cevahir Çığla
  • A. Aydın Alatan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7584)


In this study, novel techniques are presented addressing the challenges of stereo matching algorithms for surveillance and vehicle control. For this purpose, one of the most efficient local stereo matching techniques, namely permeability filter, is modified in terms of road plane geometry and temporal consistency in order to take the major challenges of such a scenario into account. Relaxing smoothness assumption of the permeability filter along vertical axis enables extraction of road geometry with high accuracy, even for the cases where ground plane does not contain sufficient textural information. On the other hand, temporal smoothness is enforced by transferring reliable depth assignments against illumination changes, reflections and instant occlusions. According to the extensive experiments on a recent challenging stereo video dataset, the proposed modifications provide reliable disparity maps under severe challenges and low texture distribution, improving scene analyses for surveillance related applications. Although improvements are illustrated for a specific local stereo matching algorithm, the presented specifications and modifications can be applied for the other similar stereo algorithms as well.


Consecutive Frame Stereo Match Stereo Pair Permeability Filter Stereo Video 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Sharstein, D., Szeliski, R.: A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. International Journal on Computer Vision 47, 7–42 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Yoon, K.-J., Kweon, I.S.: Adaptive support weight approach for correspondence search. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28(4), 650–656 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porikli, F.: Constant time O(1) bilateral filtering. In: CVPR (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qingxiong, Y., Kar-Han, T., Ahuja, N.: Real-Time O(1) Bilateral Filtering. In: CVPR, pp. 557–564 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    He, K., Sun, J., Tang, X.: Guided Image Filtering. In: Daniilidis, K., Maragos, P., Paragios, N. (eds.) ECCV 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6311, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rhemann, C., Hosni, A., Bleyer, M., Rother, C., Gelautz, M.: Fast cost-volume filtering for visual correspondence and beyond. In: CVPR 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, K., Lu, J., Lafruit, G.: Cross based stereo matching using orthogonal integral images. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 19(7) (July 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cigla, C., Alatan, A.A.: Efficient Edge-Preserving Stereo Matching. In: ICCV LDRMC Workshop (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tombari, F., Mattoccia, S., Di Stefano, L., Addimanda, E.: Classification and Evaluation of Cost Aggregaton methods for stereo Correspondence. In: International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirschmüller, H., Scharstein, D.: Evaluation of stereo matching costs on images with radiometric differences. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31(9), 1582–1599 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cevahir Çığla
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Aydın Alatan
    • 2
  1. 1.ASELSAN Inc.AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Middle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations