Advertisement

Responsible Research and Innovation in Industry: From Ethical Acceptability to Social Desirability

  • Łukasz NazarkoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a synthesis of the current body of knowledge on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) as an emerging paradigm and a novel approach to governing science and innovation with the aim of making them ethically acceptable and socially desirable. The text focuses on RRI relevance not only as a new framework for research and innovation policy but also as a novel expression of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in enterprises engaged in technological innovation. Theoretical and practical issues concerning the link between RRI and CSR are studied. Additionally, an approach based on Future-Oriented Technology Assessment is proposed as a practical mechanism of advancing RRI in an enterprise or a whole sector.

Keywords

Responsible research and innovation Corporate social responsibility Technology assessment Industry 

References

  1. Arnaldi, S., Gorgoni, G., & Pariotti, E. (2016). RRI as a governance paradigm: What is new? In R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Griessler, A. Loconto, & N. Mejlgaard (Eds.), Navigating towards shared responsibility in research and innovation approach, process and results of the Res-AGorA Project (pp. 23–29). Res-AGorA: Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1995). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2015). The emerging concept of responsible innovation. three reasons why it is questionable and calls for a radical transformation of the concept of innovation. In B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation 2: Concepts, approaches, and applications (pp. 19–35). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Ceicyte, J., & Petraite, M. (2018). Networked responsibility approach for responsible innovation: Perspective of the firm. Sustainability, 10(6), 1720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesborough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Ejdys, J. (2014). Future oriented strategy for SMEs. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2011). DG research workshop on responsible research & innovation in Europe, Brussels, 16–17 May 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation-workshop-newsletter_en.pdf.
  8. European Parliament. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020—The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) and re-pealing Decision No. 1982/2006/EC.Google Scholar
  9. European Science Foundation. (2013). Science in society: Caring for our futures in turbulent times. Science Policy Briefing No. 50. http://archives.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/spb50_ScienceInSociety.pdf.
  10. Geoghegan-Quinn, M. A. (2012). Keynote speech at the “Science in Dialogue” Conference. Odense, 23–25 April 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/archives/commission_2010-2014/geoghegan-quinn/headlines/speeches/2012/documents/20120423-dialogue-conference-speech_en.pdf.
  11. Grunwald, A. (2009). Technology assessment: Concepts and methods. In A. Meijers (Ed.), Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 1103–1146). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grunwald, A. (2011). Responsible innovation: Bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research. Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, 7, 9–31. www.itas.kit.edu/pub/v/2011/grun11c.pdf.
  13. Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology assessment for responsible innovation. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B. J. Koops, & H. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible innovation 1: Innovative solutions for global issues (pp. 15–32). Sringer: Cham.Google Scholar
  14. Halicka, K. (2014). Designing routes of development of renewable energy technologies. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hankins, J. (2013). Endnotes: Building capacity for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation. Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 269–274). London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardeman, S. (2015). Discussion with J. Stigloe’s “Against Excellence” talk. Joint Research Centre. https://youtu.be/xDxOvKfr9MY?t=44m56s.
  17. Iatridis, K., & Schroeder, D. (2016). Responsible research and innovation in industry: The case for corporate responsibility tools. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Kononiuk, A., & Nazarko, J. (2014). Scenariusze w antycypowaniu i kształtowaniu przyszłości. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Koops, B. J. (2015). The concepts, approaches, and applications of responsible innovation. In B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation 2: Concepts, approaches, and applications (pp. 1–15). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Lund Declaration. (2009). Conference: New worlds—New solutions. Research and Innovation as a Basis for Developing Europe in a Global Context, Lund, Sweden, 7–8 July, https://era.gv.at/object/document/130/attach/1lund_declaration_final_version_9_july.pdf.
  21. Martinuzzi, A., Blok, V., Brem, A., Stahl, B., & Schönherr, N. (2018). Responsible research and innovation in industry—Challenges, insights and perspectives. Sustainability, 10(3), 702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nazarko, J., Glinska, U., Kononiuk, A., & Nazarko, L. (2013). Sectoral foresight in Poland: Thematic and methodological analysis. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 9(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nazarko, L. (2014). Inteligentne specjalizacje polskich regionów – przyczynek do ewaluacji. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 15(8/1), 247–262.Google Scholar
  24. Nazarko, L. (2015). Technology assessment in construction sector as a strategy towards sustainability. Procedia Engineering, 122, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nazarko, L. (2016). Responsible research and innovation—A new paradigm of technology management. In: 9th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2016”, 12–13 May, Vilnius, Lithuania.Google Scholar
  26. Nazarko, L. (2017). Future-Oriented Technology Assessment. Procedia Engineering, 182, 504–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Owen, R., Macnaghten, Ph, & Stigloe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polanyi, M. (1962). The republic of science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva, 1(1), 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Radziszewski, P., Nazarko, J., Vilutiene, T., Debkowska, K., Ejdys, J., Gudanowska, A., et al. (2016). Future trends in road pavement technologies development in the context of environmental protection. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 11(2), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Responsible Industry. (2017). Responsible industry: Guide for the implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the industrial context. www.responsible-industry.eu.
  31. Robinson, D. K. R. (2009). Co-evolutionary scenarios: An application to prospecting futures of the responsible development of nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 1222–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Scholten, V. E., & Blok, V. (2015). Foreword: Responsible innovation in the private sector. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stahl, B. (2018). RRI in industry: On the translation of the RRI discourse into the private domain. Orbit Journal, 1(3).Google Scholar
  34. Stigloe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42, 1568–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tancoigne, E., Randles, S., & Joly, P.-B. (2016). Evolution of a concept: A scientometric analysis of RRI. In R. Indner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Griessler, A. Loconto, & N. Mejlgaard (Eds.), Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project (pp. 39–44). Karlsruhe: Res-AGorA.Google Scholar
  36. van de Poel, I., Asveld, L., Flipse, S., Klaassen, P., Scholten, V., & Yaghmaei, E. (2017). Company strategies for Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): A conceptual model. Sustainability, 9(11), 2045.Google Scholar
  37. von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp, R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren (pp. 39–61). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  38. von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51–74). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Wachowiak, P. (2013). The process of social reporting—An original model. Organization and Management, 154(1), 123–141.Google Scholar
  40. Weinberg, A. M. (1963). Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva, 1(2), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementBiałystok University of TechnologyBiałystokPoland

Personalised recommendations