Enhancing Vehicle Ingress/Egress Ergonomics with Digital Human Models

  • Nanxin Wang
  • Ksenia Kozak
  • Jian Wan
  • Gianna Gomez-Levi
  • Gary Strumolo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 195)

Abstract

The ease of getting in and out of a vehicle (or ingress/egress) is one of the most important ergonomic issues for automotive manufacturers. It represents the first physical contact of a customer with a vehicle. A pleasant sensation while interfacing with the vehicle plays a vital role in vehicle purchasing decisions. Understanding and being able to assess vehicle ingress/egress performance early in a design process is therefore critical to a successful vehicle design. Conventional method relies on clinic research with physical bucks, which is a time consuming and pure subjective process. A new hardware-in-the-loop motion analysis system has been developed, which uses the latest motion capture, biomechanical and digital human modelling technologies to capture and analyse human motions as the driver or passenger interacts with a vehicle. The design assessment is provided in both subjective ratings and, for the first time, the physical data (e.g., swept volumes in CAD). The use of the system avoids costly seating buck builds and reduces engineering time and cost associated with both buck build and conducting the tests. Most importantly, it enables engineers to assess a vehicle’s ingress/egress performances early in its design process, which will lead to better vehicle packages and better customer satisfaction.

Keywords

Vehicle ergonomics Ingress/egress Motion capture Biomechanics Digital human modelling 

References

  1. 1.
    SAE J1100 (2002) Surface vehicle recommended practice—motor vehicle dimensionsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Programmable Vehicle Model, Prefix, http://www.prefix.com/services.htm
  3. 3.
    Richards A, Bhise V (2004) Evaluation of the PVM methodology to evaluate vehicle interior packages. SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0370Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang N, Kiridena V, Wan J, Gomez-Levi G (2006) Design and verification of a new computer controlled seating buck. DETC2006-99393 ASME International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Philadelphia, 10–13 Sept 2006Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Monnier G, Wang X, Verriest JP, Goujon S (2003) Simulation of complex and specific task orientated movements—application to the automotive seat belt reaching. SAE international conference and exposition of digital human modelling for design and engineering, Monreal, SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2225, 17–19 June 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reed M, Parkinson M, Chaffin D (2003) A new approach to modeling driver reach. SAE World Congress, Detroit, SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0587, 3–6 Mar 2003Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang X, Chevalot N, Trasbot J (2008) Prediction of in-vehicle reach surfaces and discomfort by digital human models. SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1869Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dufour F, Wang X (2005) Discomfort assessment of car ingress/egress motions using the concept of neutral movement. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2706Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Monnier G, Renard F, Chameroy A, Wang X, Trasbot J (2006) A motion simulation approach integrated into a design engineering process.SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-2359Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Human Builder, Dassault Systems, http://www.3ds.com/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nanxin Wang
    • 1
  • Ksenia Kozak
    • 1
  • Jian Wan
    • 1
  • Gianna Gomez-Levi
    • 1
  • Gary Strumolo
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and Advanced EngineeringFord Motor CompanyDearbornUSA

Personalised recommendations