Parameters Optimization of PHEV Based on Cost-Effectiveness from Life Cycle View in China

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 191)

Abstract

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) technology combining the merits of Battery electric vehicle (BEV) and Hybrid electric vehicle (HEV), has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and petroleum consumption in the transportation sector. However, the cost-benefit of PHEVs mainly determined by battery technology, optimal powertrain design, and vehicle kilometers daily traveled and charging habits. Targeting to cost-benefit, the optimal design method was presented, taking battery cycle life Vs DOD data, driving data, battery performance data into consideration. The method provided optimal vehicle designs to realize minimum life cycle cost, and maximum petroleum consumption under different scenarios. For A-segment equivalent PHEV (similar to a F3DM), under Shanghai urban driving conditions, it can be find that while PHEVs with present traction battery technology, 30 km AER was most life cycle cost-effective to obtain maximum petroleum displacement based on Shanghai driving data. Large capacity battery lead to petroleum displacement not so much as cost increased. At China electricity price off peak, Li-ion battery pack costs must fall below ¥2.0/Wh to be cost competitive with equivalent internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEs).

Keywords

Plug-in hybrid Cost-benefit Parameters optimization All electric range Vehicle kilometers daily traveled 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the subsidy of International S&T Cooperation Program of China (ISTCP):2010DFA72760

References

  1. 1.
    CAAM. The automotive industry production and sales by the end of 2011 [EB/OL], 2012-01-10/2012-07-18. http://www.caam.org.cn/zhengche/20120112/1605066964.htm
  2. 2.
    Sina. Import of crude oil increased by 6% and oil dependence increased to 56.5% in 2011[EB/OL], 2012-01-13/ 2012-07-20. http://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/cyxw/20120113/023011191685.shtml
  3. 3.
    MEP. China Vehicle Pollution Prevention Annual Report (2010) (English abstract in Chinese) [R], Beijing: MET, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    SAE J1715. Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) & Electric Vehicle (EV) Terminology [S]. U.S.SAE 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simpson A (2006) Cost-benefit analysis of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle technology [z]. Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kloess M (2009) The role of plug-in-hybrids as bridging technology towards pure electric cars: an economic assessment [z]. Shenzhe, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DAE of THU. Survey of industry of electric vehicle in China [R]. Beijing. 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and EnergyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.China Automotive Energy Research Center (CAERC)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations