Design Science in Action: Researching and Developing the IT-CMF

  • Markus Helfert
  • Martin Curley
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 286)

Abstract

Despite the increasing popularity of design science research, understanding the development of design artifacts and engagement of domain experts is still limited. Several guidelines and suggestions concerning design science research have been proposed, however combining practical utility and academic rigor can be difficult, in particular when research is co-funded by industry. In this paper we describe a design environment in the context of the development of a novel IT Management model, the IT Capability Maturity Framework. The paper illustrates an example of design science in action and explores the relation between design process and design artifacts. The contributions show how and what types of design artifacts can be developed, its benefits and challenges within a research consortium. We conclude our paper by discussing areas for further research.

Keywords

Design Science Methodology Artifacts Design Science Literature Review 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J.: Developing Maturity Models for IT Management – A Procedure Model and its Application. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(3), 213–222 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brattleteig: Design Research in Informatics: A comment to Iivari. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 65–74 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun, C., Wortmann, F., Hafner, F., Winter, R.: Method construction - a core approach to organizational engineering. In: SAC 2005, pp. 1295–1299 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curley, M.: IT Innovation, a new Era. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Computational Science, Reading, UK (2006a)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curley, M.: Managing Information Technology for Business Value. Intel Press (January 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curley, M.: Introducing an IT Capability Maturity Framework. In: Cardos, J., Cordeiro, J., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2007. LNBIP, vol. 12, pp. 63–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curley, M.: The IT Capability Framework, A Theory for continuously improving the value delivered from IT capability. Doctoral Dissertation, National University of Ireland, Maynooth (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Curley, M.: A Value Based IT Capability Maturity Framework. Intel EMEA Academic Forum, Ireland (2006b)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curley, M.: The IT transformation at Intel. MIS Quarterly Executive 5(4(1)), 109–122 (2006c)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curley, M., Kenneally, J.: The IT Capability Maturity Framework, Innovation Value Institute, National University of Ireland, Maynooth (2009, 2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gericke, et al.: Situational Method Engineering for Governance, Risk and Compliance Information Systems. In: DESRIST 2009, Malvern, PA, USA, May 7-8 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gutzwiller, T.: Das CC fur den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsrieentierten Informationssytems, Physica, Heidelberg (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Helfert, M., Donnellan, B.: The Case for Design Science Utility - Evaluation of Design Science artifacts within the IT Capability Maturity Framework. In: DESRIST 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hevner, A.R.: A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian JIS 19(2), 87–92 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Science Research in Information Systems. Springer Science and Business Media (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Humphrey, W.: Managing the Software Process. Addison Wesley (1989)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Johannsen, W., Goeken, M.: Referenzmodelle für ITGovernance. dpunkt.Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Livari, J., Venable, J.: Action Research and Design Science Research – Seemingly Similar But Decisively Dissimilar. In: ECIS 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    March, S.T., Smith, G.G.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mathiassen, L., Nielsen, P.A.: Engaged Scholarship in IS Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 20(2), Article 1 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mettler, T., Rohner, P.: Situational Maturity Models as Instrumental Artifacts for Organizational Design. In: DESRIST 2009, Malvern, PA, USA, May 7-8 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Offermann, P., Levina, O., Schönherr, M., Bub, U.: Outline of a Design Science Research Process. In: Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, Malvern (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paulk, M.C., Weber, C.V., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B.: Capability Maturity ModelSM for Software, Version 1.1. Technical Report (Carnegie Mellon University / Software Engineering Institute) (February 1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Purao, S.: Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare. GSU Department of CIS Working Paper, Atlanta (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rossi, M., Sein, M.: Design Research Workshop: A Proactive Research Approach. Presentation delivered at IRIS 26, August 9-12, (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Research in Information Systems (January 20, 2004), http://ais.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=279 (last updated August 16, 2009)
  30. 30.
    Van de Ven, A.H.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford Univ. Press (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Venable, J.R.: A Framework for Design Science Research Activities. In: Proceedings of the Information Resource Management Association Conference, Washington, DC, USA, May 21-24 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Helfert
    • 1
  • Martin Curley
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.IntelLexlipIreland

Personalised recommendations