Design Science Approach to Measure Productivity in Agile Software Development

  • Richard Vidgen
  • Brian Donnellan
  • Sabine Matook
  • Kieran Conboy
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 286)

Abstract

While adoption of agile software methods is high, little hard, rigorous evidence exists as to the success of these approaches. This paper describes the design science process that will be used to create a measure for productivity in agile development environments. We consider design science to be suitable because measuring performance in software development is laden with issues around measurability, ambiguity and imperfection. As a result, we need the rigor that design science brings while still maintaining relevance.

Keywords

design science agile development productivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schatz, B., Abdelshafi, I.: Primavera gets agile: a successful transition to agile development. IEEE Software 22, 36–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conboy, K.: Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Information Systems Research 20, 329–354 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vidgen, R., Wang, X.: Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development. Information Systems Research 20, 355–376 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cross, N.: Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iivari, J., Venable, J.R.: Action research and design science research-Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In: European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Iacono, C.S.: Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research. Information Systems Research 12, 121–134 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.: The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties. MIS Quarterly 27, 183–194 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Introduction to the special issue on design science. Information Systems and e-Business Management 9, 1–9 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251–266 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmidt, J., Lyle, D.: Lean Integration: An Integration Factory Approach to Business Agility. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ohno, T.: Toyota production system. Productivity, Portland (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Linstone, H.A.: Multiple perspectives: overcoming the weaknesses of MS/OR. Interfaces, 77–85 (1985)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitroff, I.I., Linstone, H.A.: The unbounded mind: Breaking the chains of traditional business thinking. Oxford University Press, USA (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Linstone, H.A.: Multiple perspectives: concept, applications, and user guidelines. Systemic Practice and Action Research 2, 307–331 (1989)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abrahamsson, P., Conboy, K., Wang, X.: ‘Lots done, more to do’: the current state of agile development research. European Journal of Information Systems 18, 281–284 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Vidgen
    • 1
  • Brian Donnellan
    • 2
  • Sabine Matook
    • 3
  • Kieran Conboy
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian School of BusinessUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Innovation Value InstituteNational University of IrelandMaynoothIreland
  3. 3.UQ Business SchoolThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations