Exploring the Relationship between Design Science Research and Innovation: A Case Study of Innovation at Chevron

  • Jack Anderson
  • Brian Donnellan
  • Alan Hevner
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 286)


What is the relationship between design science research and innovation? Our industry-academic collaboration poses this intriguing question and suggests a context and an experimental design for its study. We wish to understand the synergies between the active research areas of DSR and innovation by exploring their overlapping concepts and identifying unique ideas in each that have the potential to inform the other. We present a case study of an actual innovation process in Chevron as a source of empirical data for the exploration and subsequent analysis of how the application of DSR guidelines might inform the practical implementation of innovation processes.


Design Science Research Innovation Case Study Research Artefact Evaluation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Porter, M.: Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6), 77 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schumpeter, J.A.: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 6th edn., pp. 81–84, Routledge (1943)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hevner, A.: A Three-Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 19(2), 87–92 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline vs. Design Science. Design Issues 17(3), 49–55 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weber, R.: Towards a Theory of Artifacts: A Paradigmatic Base for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Systems 1(1), 3–20 (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orlikowski, W., Iacono, S.: Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the ‘IT’ in IT Research: A Call for Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12, 121–134 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.: Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Question of Relevance. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 3–16 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.: The Identity Crisis within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline’s Core Properties. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 183–194 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adams, R., Bessant, J., Phelps, R.: Innovation Management Measurement: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews 8(1), 21–47 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wolfe, R.: Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Management Studies 31(3), 405–431 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Slappendel, C.: Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations. Organization Studies 17(1), 107–129 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kautz, K., Nielsen, P.A.: Understanding the Implementation of Software Process Improvement Innovations in Software Organisations. Information Systems Journal 14(1), 3–22 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., Nelson, R. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shavinina, L. (ed.): The International Handbook on Innovation. Elsevier, Oxford (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Avgerou, C.: New Socio-Technical Perspectives of IS Innovation in Organizations. In: Avgerou, C., Larovere, R.L. (eds.) ICT Innovation: Economic and Organizational Perspectives, pp. 141–161. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swanson, E.: Information Systems Innovation among Organizations. Management Science 40(9), 1069–1088 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Feeney, D., Wilcocks, L.: Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 9–21 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peppard, J., Lambert, R., Edwards, C.: Whose Job is it Anyway?: Organizational Information Competencies for Value Creation. Information Systems Journal 10, 291–322 (2000)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peppard, J., Ward, J.: Beyond Strategic Information Systems: Towards an IS Capability. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13, 167–190 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Curley, M.: Managing Information Technology for Business Value. Intel Press (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Curley, M.: Introducing an IT Capability Maturity Framework. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J., Cardoso, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2007. LNBIP, vol. 12, pp. 63–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kelly, T.: The Art of Innovation: Lessons in Creativity from IDEO. America’s Leading Design Firm, Doubleday, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.: A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46, 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis, C.: Levinas: an introduction. Polity Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cooper, R.: Developing New Products On Time In: Time Product Innovation Management 11(5) (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gregor, S., Hevner, A.: Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. White Paper submitted for publication (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Van de Ven, A.: Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford Univ. Press (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathiassen, L., Nielsen, P.: Engaged Scholarship in IS Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 20(2) (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack Anderson
    • 1
  • Brian Donnellan
    • 2
  • Alan Hevner
    • 3
  1. 1.Chevron CorporationUSA
  2. 2.National University of Ireland MaynoothIreland
  3. 3.University of South FloridaUSA

Personalised recommendations